View Full Version : Rutgers

11-10-2006, 02:48 AM
Anyone else here feel like they may get a raw deal? I know they are in the Big East, but they beat a team that WOULD HAVE playe din th BCS championship if they would have won out.

Any thoughts?

11-10-2006, 12:36 PM
I don't think they will even get in reguardless of OSU/Michigan result. I think that game will not only be on 11/18, it will also be 1/8. I do not doubt it one bit.

11-13-2006, 07:04 AM
Rutgers will Not be there and they shouldnt be. The big east...:toofunny: they dont have anyone of any concern for the SEC . Arkansas or Florida or Tennessee or Georgia would spank Rutgers. Little less Ohio State or Michigan or USC... Rutgers...:blah: :banging: :wave: :jawdrop:

11-13-2006, 03:38 PM
WOW only 4 unbeaten college teams Michigan, Ohio State, Rutgers & Boise St

11-13-2006, 03:49 PM
How about them hawgs:thumbsup:

11-13-2006, 05:41 PM
I honestly feel rutgers would stack up well against most SEC teams. I'll say more if they beat WVU.

11-13-2006, 06:08 PM
I sort of thought they were getting a raw deal until I looked at who they've played.

North Carolina, 1-9

Illinois, 2-9

Ohio 7-3 (in the MAC)

Howard 4-7 (in the Mid-Eastern)

South Florida 7-3

Navy 7-3

Pitt 6-4

Connecticut 4-5

Louisville 8-1

Even the teams with good records aren't that good, just OK. M&M passed on the fact that their schedule is 66th strongest in the country. USC's is 2nd, Cal's 4th, Notre Dame's 22nd, Louisville's 24th. There are some cupcakes in there, too.

11-13-2006, 07:21 PM
A lot of these scenarios are argued before they're even a reality - and many of them never become a reality - just a week ago, everybody was arguing for Cal and Texas -Rutgers still has to beat WV on the road ...maybe everybody should wait for the outcome of this game and then let the debates begin on how horrible the BCS is or isn't

11-18-2006, 07:05 AM
West Virginia 34
Rutgers 19
'NUFF SAID:thumbsup: :sofunny: :blah: :tt02: :helmet: :tt02: