View Full Version : Nate Ilaoa
TasmanianTroy271
01-20-2007, 04:18 PM
Instead of taking one of the bigger name RB's on the first day, why don't we take Nate on the second day? He's 5-9, almost 250 pounds, and he runs a little over a 4.5. Check out his TD from the Hula Bowl.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ESTqKRJiPMw
Dylan
02-14-2007, 01:11 PM
What college is this guy from? i cant tell.
Crushzilla
03-01-2007, 09:28 AM
He's from Hawaii. I saw about half of that game and he's a little beast. About 5'7 I think they said. He's about 5'7 around too. He's built a lot like Maurice Jones-Drew and was tearing through the defense of whoever they played in that game. He's quick too for his size. Not sure how he would make the leap, but I agree he might be worth a peak on day two.
BIGBENFASTWILLIE
03-01-2007, 09:41 AM
I would much rather drat Chris Henry, he was amazing at the combine. 6" 233 fan a 4.33 unofficial, and a 4.4 official....
He didnt start in college (kinda like willie partker) he was expected to be drafted in the 6-7th round......possibley not at all
now scouts are lookin at him being a second day pick....
http://forums.steelersfever.com/showthread.php?p=222033#post222033
DACEB
03-01-2007, 10:59 AM
I don't think RB is a big need especially with our cap situation. But, I am one of the many that believe we need a big bruiser to compliment FWP and I'm not sure if it's Davenport or Kuhn. Whoever we get MUST be able to pass block, that is a for sure!
I would definetly make an exception if either T. Hunt or B. Leonard were available in the 3rd round.
vBulletin® v3.8.4, Copyright ©2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.