PDA

View Full Version : Keisel excited about LBer plans


polamalufan43
03-18-2007, 07:23 PM
http://story.scout.com/a.z?s=117&p=2&c=627605


The Steelers begin voluntary workouts Monday, but one player?s been anxiously roaming the halls of the team?s practice facilities since the middle of February.
That?s because defensive end Brett Keisel can?t wait to showcase his linebacker skills at the April 20 minicamp.

The Steelers, because they have a new coach, have been granted an extra minicamp by the league, and they?ve scheduled it the week before the draft in order to look over some players at new positions.

Keisel is one of them He?ll get a chance to play outside linebacker.

?Coach (Dick) LeBeau has come to me and told me we?re going to do some different things, maybe similar to what Baltimore does with Adalius Thomas or something like that,? Keisel said of the former 270-pound linebacker in the Ravens? 3-4 defense.

Keisel played at 285 pounds last season and said he?d like to get down to 280 before April 20.

?I?ve asked them what to do about my weight and they?ve said, ?Just do what you do,?? he said. ?So I have made it a goal to slim down a little bit, and then if things work out, where I?m just in the trenches with Casey (Hampton) and Aaron (Smith), then that time in between minicamp and training camp I?ll be able to stack it back up. But for now I?m going to lighten up a little bit.?

His take on the opportunity?

?I would love that. I would love that,? Keisel said. ?I think I could do it. For three years now I?ve had to know it all, but I?ve never gotten the opportunity to do it in a game. I?ve practiced it and repped it out on the practice field, but I?ve never had an opportunity to do something in a game, so I hope so.?

CONTRACT TALK

Another experiment the Steelers will monitor is the move of right guard Kendall Simmons to center.

The team opened preliminary contract-extension talks with Simmons, Alan Faneca and Troy Polamalu, but are wary of becoming too involved with Simmons until he shows better potential at center than he has at guard.

The Steelers have had difficulty against teams with powerful defensive tackles across from Simmons because he?s more agile than strong. The team believes that agility could be put to better use at center, as it was with Dermontti Dawson and Jeff Hartings.

Of course, the Steelers signed free agent Sean Mahan to a $17.5 million contract just in case the move of Simmons doesn?t work. Last preseason, Simmons struggled with the shotgun snap but the team believes a full offseason at the position should correct the problem.

Unlike the Steelers? stance with right tackle Max Starks -- who?s also entering the final season of his contract -- the team opened preliminary talks with Simmons because of the brewing problem at guard. Not only are the two starters entering their final contract seasons, but backup Chris Kemoeatu has yet to display an understanding of the offensive system, and the situation could only worsen for the third-year pro after new offensive coordinator Bruce Arians installs his changes.

The Steelers prefer a big, strong guard, such as Kemoeatu, and that?s why Mahan, a 301-pounder, would only be considered a stop-gap measure should Simmons win the job at center.

As for Starks, he?ll remain on the open market as a restricted free agent until April 20. Should another team sign him away, the Steelers would be compensated with a first-round draft pick. If not, the Steelers will gauge Starks?s physical condition at the minicamp.

According to a source with the team, if Starks is in shape, talks will begin on a contract extension. But if Starks reports close to the 400 pounds at which he reported last spring, the Steelers will let him play out his current contract.

TRACKING TOMLIN

The Steelers may still talk to free-agent punter Matt Turk, the brother of former Steeler Dan Turk, but all talks were put on hold last week as Tomlin and director of football operations Kevin Colbert hit the pro-day trail.

On Tuesday, Tomlin showed up at Arkansas to watch DE Jamaal Anderson and CB Chris Houston; on Wednesday, he watched WRs Dwayne Bowe and Craig Davis at LSU; on Thursday, Tomlin appeared at Florida State to see OLB Lawrence Timmons; and on Friday, he showed up at Michigan to watch the workouts of first-day prospects CB Leon Hall. DT Alan Branch, ILB David Harris, and DE LaMarr Woodley.

The most telling appearance may have been the one at Florida State, where Tomlin was the only NFL head coach. He drew the attention of Timmons?s agent, Drew Rosenhaus, who was overheard telling Tomlin that his client would ?be in better shape by minicamp,? according to the Orlando Sentinel.

Timmons measured 6-0 7/8 at the combine and weighed 234 pounds. He ran a 4.66 40 at the combine and didn?t improve upon the time at his pro day.

~Polamalufan43:tt02:

SteelCzar76
03-18-2007, 08:01 PM
The thought of Jamaal Anderson up front with Hamp and Aaron,......and Keisel at OLBer is one i'd be very interested in seeing play out.
Though i really, really hope Coach Tomlin passes on Timmons. He's 'decent',.....but we need to make every pick 'count' this year. (Ie: No Cocloughs, Alonzo Jacksons, Fred Gibsons or Adibis)

GBMelBlount
03-18-2007, 08:16 PM
The thought of Jamaal Anderson up front with Hamp and Aaron,......and Keisel at OLBer is one i'd be very interested in seeing play out.
Though i really, really hope Coach Tomlin passes on Timmons. He's 'decent',.....but we need to make every pick 'count' this year. (Ie: No Cocloughs, Alonzo Jacksons, Fred Gibsons or Adibis)

76, Kiesel is a solid, athletic player. Would he start at linebacker? Also, do you think Anderson would be an upgrade over Kiesel?

Atlanta Dan
03-18-2007, 08:38 PM
Interesting read

Glad to read about Keisel's enthusiasm; at least one vet has a good attitude.

Seems like Simmons last chance to stick is at center but that Kemoeatu may not have the brains to play OL and step in at guard; with Faneca probably gone after 2007 I now look for a high draft pick on an O-lineman.

As for Starks, the report he came in to mini-camp at 400 lbs last spring is further evidence this team took 2006 off; need to hope someone is dumb enough to make him an offer. Colon may not work out but Starks will never be the answer.

The OL may be shaping up as the long term weakest link on the team.

Sorry for the choppy thoughts but I am a little punchy after watching wall to wall hoops for 4 days

SteelCzar76
03-18-2007, 08:47 PM
76, Kiesel is a solid, athletic player. Would he start at linebacker? Also, do you think Anderson would be an upgrade over Kiesel?



I think if he (Keisel) could drop a few pounds,.....he might actually perform very well at OLB. (As you stated,...he certainly has the athleticism) It's not as though we have any outstanding talent 'waiting in the wings',......just average cats like Harrison. Whom he very well might actually outproduce hands down. (Ala Kevin Greene ?)
And i do think Anderson would be an upgrade at End. Not just because of his own considerable athletic ability,...but because of his strength, 'motor' and frame. (The latter of which will allow him to put on more bulk in time.)
He's a true D-lineman IMO. Not just simply a 'tweener' with some upside like Jarvis Moss or Quentin Moses.

steelerbackr4life
03-18-2007, 08:48 PM
I would have serious trepedations signing a client of Drew Rosenhaus

GBMelBlount
03-18-2007, 09:00 PM
Interesting read

Glad to read about Keisel's enthusiasm; at least one vet has a good attitude.

Seems like Simmons last chance to stick is at center but that Kemoeatu may not have the brains to play OL and step in at guard; with Faneca probably gone after 2007 I now look for a high draft pick on an O-lineman.

As for Starks, the report he came in to mini-camp at 400 lbs last spring is further evidence this team took 2006 off; need to hope someone is dumb enough to make him an offer. Colon may not work out but Starks will never be the answer.

The OL may be shaping up as the long term weakest link on the team.

Sorry for the choppy thoughts but I am a little punchy after watching wall to wall hoops for 4 days

Dan, you are 100% right. There are so many question marks on O-line it is scary. Remember what has happened to us in recent years when the O-line hasn't performed well! We may even need two solid picks! I love offense & would love to see another RB/WR up there, but as unglamorous as it is, nothing happens without a solid line! But dang I'd love to see a RB/WR...Oh well.

steelpinstripe72
03-18-2007, 09:07 PM
I would have serious trepedations signing a client of Drew Rosenhaus

I was just thinking that. During the TO situation in Philly, he was half the problem. But we must have some Rosenhaus clients on the team already, no?

Stlrs4Life
03-18-2007, 09:14 PM
Going to very interesting to say the least.

steelerbackr4life
03-18-2007, 09:31 PM
I was just thinking that. During the TO situation in Philly, he was half the problem. But we must have some Rosenhaus clients on the team already, no?

Im sure if we do they are the type that will probably never get a second contract. I really cant see the Rooneys being to receptive to Rosenhaus tactics.

RoethlisBURGHer
03-18-2007, 09:34 PM
I was just thinking that. During the TO situation in Philly, he was half the problem. But we must have some Rosenhaus clients on the team already, no?

The only DR client on the team is Najeh Davenport.Most of his clients are high-profile,and at one point Davenport was kinda high-profile,coming from Tha (THUG) U.

steelerbackr4life
03-18-2007, 09:37 PM
The only DR client on the team is Najeh Davenport.Most of his clients are high-profile,and at one point Davenport was kinda high-profile,coming from Tha (THUG) U.

Thanks for the info

RoethlisBURGHer
03-18-2007, 09:50 PM
Thanks for the info

No problem.

The reason DR has so few low-profile clients is because he only gets 2% of every deal he gets you (football contract,advertisment contract,etc.) when other agents get 3-5% of the deals.So he needs the high-profile guys to really make the money,and yes,that 1% is a big amount.

And the TO thing was mostly because TO's old agent brokered the Eagles deal,so Drew didn't get jack from that deal.Plus,TO is a maniac,Drew had no choice but to defend his client.He couldn't drop him because TO would get a big new contract with the Eagles or someone else.

Sh!t,now I sound like a DR apologist.

Preacher
03-18-2007, 10:29 PM
I gotta agree A-D... Our O line may be our biggest long term issue.

However, Do we need to go to the draft this year for one? I say solidify the LB, CB, and RB positions (a True 2nd back to rest willie) in this draft. Take some shots at small school CB's and LB's in the later rounds this year, but focus on finding at least one more player at CB and two at LB through the draft. Then, next year, we draft for the O and D line. Year after that, we go back for a WR to start grooming in the place of Ward.

SteelCzar76
03-18-2007, 11:29 PM
Take some shots at small school CB's.



I don't know Padre,.....but i'm along the line of thinking that says,.....maybe it's time to start taking the positon seriously. It's my opinion that contrary to what many of the 'Supreme optimists' of the 'Nation' believe,......Coclough was an absurd pick and Ike is not that much better.
I know, I know,......."He shut down Chad Johnson". LOL (Knock it off)
But as much as i hate to say it,...... he's nearly as great a liabilty as Chard Scott in regards to giving up TD's. (And probably worse in terms of giving up completions for first downs)

OneForTheToe
03-19-2007, 12:03 AM
I think O'line is the most important unit on this team to fix. Seems to me it will be difficult to evaluate the much wanted second running back, if that back is consistently getting hit two yards behind the line. Likewise, the much anticipated rebound for Ben will not materialize he continues to receive lookout blocks. Additionally, no matter how much one upgrades the defense, no defense will be effective if they have to spend too much time on the field, because the offense can't move the ball and eat up some clock.

MasterOfPuppets
03-19-2007, 02:16 AM
I gotta agree A-D... Our O line may be our biggest long term issue.

However, Do we need to go to the draft this year for one? I say solidify the LB, CB, and RB positions (a True 2nd back to rest willie) in this draft. Take some shots at small school CB's and LB's in the later rounds this year, but focus on finding at least one more player at CB and two at LB through the draft. Then, next year, we draft for the O and D line. Year after that, we go back for a WR to start grooming in the place of Ward.

QUOTE=Preacher;229267]I gotta agree A-D... Our O line may be our biggest long term issue.

However, Do we need to go to the draft this year for one?

absolutley!!!! we apparently have a problem with center....which cowher had everyone believing okobie was the heir apparent.
kenda simmons sucks at guard and its either center or bust for him.
max starks is in his last year of contract,which no way that slow footed out of shape moron shpould ever see more money.
faneca has a contract coming up and god only knows what it'll take to keep him..

19ward86
03-19-2007, 08:38 AM
our outside linebackers pretty much already play a DE position now, so it wouldnt be too much more of a transition for keisel to change positions.

DACEB
03-19-2007, 10:16 AM
The Steelers begin voluntary workouts Monday, but one player?s been anxiously roaming the halls of the team?s practice facilities since the middle of February. That?s because defensive end Brett Keisel can?t wait to showcase his linebacker skills at the April 20 minicamp.

The Steelers, because they have a new coach, have been granted an extra minicamp by the league, and they?ve scheduled it the week before the draft in order to look over some players at new positions.

Keisel is one of them He?ll get a chance to play outside linebacker.

?Coach (Dick) LeBeau has come to me and told me we?re going to do some different things, maybe similar to what Baltimore does with Adalius Thomas or something like that,? Keisel said of the former 270-pound linebacker in the Ravens? 3-4 defense.

Keisel played at 285 pounds last season and said he?d like to get down to 280 before April 20.

?I?ve asked them what to do about my weight and they?ve said, ?Just do what you do,?? he said. ?So I have made it a goal to slim down a little bit, and then if things work out, where I?m just in the trenches with Casey (Hampton) and Aaron (Smith), then that time in between minicamp and training camp I?ll be able to stack it back up. But for now I?m going to lighten up a little bit.?

His take on the opportunity?

?I would love that. I would love that,? Keisel said. ?I think I could do it. For three years now I?ve had to know it all, but I?ve never gotten the opportunity to do it in a game. I?ve practiced it and repped it out on the practice field, but I?ve never had an opportunity to do something in a game, so I hope so.?
~Polamalufan43:tt02:

I am very excited at this prospect. I'm excited to here the enthusiasm that Keisel shows, he is a true team player. This news was posted last week in 'a different 3-4 look'. I believe this would help out in alot of ways. If we can bring in another talented end and move Keisel outside it would fortify our front 7 immensely. Our LB corp would have some more depth and it would give us some new looks. Couple that with another LB in the draft and our front 7 would be young and formidable again. I think Keisel is the perfect fit. He is athletic, strong and most of all knows the assignments and alignments already.

We need more guys like him on the team, a true leader by example. With all the negative talk from the likes of Ward and Faneca (supposed leaders), this is very refreshing to hear. I can't wait for April 20th!!

Haiku_Dirtt
03-19-2007, 03:01 PM
I would have serious trepedations signing a client of Drew Rosenhaus

Next question.

ARKIESTEEL
03-19-2007, 03:12 PM
Man I think this is great Keisel will be a force to deal with