PDA

View Full Version : Smart NFL teams spend little in FA


Stlrs4Life
03-23-2008, 09:13 AM
Smart NFL teams spend little in free agency

10:51 AM CDT on Tuesday, March 18, 2008


http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/img/standing/sports/columnists/mugs/mug_rgosselin.jpg (http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/spt/columnists/rgosselin/vitindex.html)
? E-mail


I love what the Green Bay Packers have done thus far in free agency.
Nothing.
Absolutely nothing.
The Packers haven't signed any players in free agency nor have they lost any. The Indianapolis Colts also haven't signed any players.
Football is figuring out what baseball discovered in the 1970s ? you can't buy a championship. Which is contrary to public perception.
There's a frenzy in the fan bases of 32 NFL teams each off-season. Spend. Buy free agents. The bigger the contract, the better the signing. If you're not spending, you're not trying to get better as a football team.
Au contraire.
http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/img/03-08/0318gb.jpg LOUIS DeLUCA / DMN
The Green Bay Packers haven't panicked in free agency at the thought of Aaron Rodgers or another quarterback in charge.



The Cowboys, Cleveland Browns, San Francisco 49ers and Seattle Seahawks each signed a free agent to a contract in excess of $39 million last off-season. In addition, the Washington Redskins gave aging middle linebacker London Fletcher a $10 million signing bonus, and the Jacksonville Jaguars gave journeyman offensive tackle Tony Pashos another for $9 million.
All the while, the New York Giants were sitting out the spending spree. To borrow a Jerry Jones term, the Giants were "keeping their powder dry."
The Giants wound up signing one free agent to fill a specific hole on the depth chart, bottom feeding in late March for linebacker Kawika Mitchell. They gave him a modest one-year, $1 million deal.
Mitchell is now wearing a Super Bowl ring ? and 2007 multi-millionaires Leonard Davis (Cowboys), Eric Steinbach (Browns), Nate Clements (49ers), Patrick Kerney (Seahawks), Fletcher and Pashos are not.
In 2006, the Indianapolis Colts signed only one free agent, and he wasn't even a position player ? kicker Adam Vinatieri. The Colts wound up winning the Super Bowl.
In 2005, the Pittsburgh Steelers also signed only one free agent ? wide receiver Cedrick Wilson ? to a four-year deal worth less than $10 million. He didn't even start for the Steelers. But guess who won the Super Bowl that year?
Free agency never has been and never will be the answer. Teams are realizing the game's best players no longer become free. So the smart teams invest their salary cap dollars in re-signing their own players.
Back in the 1990s, you could sign a difference-maker like Reggie White or Deion Sanders in free agency. But with each passing year, the quality of free agents decreases, yet the quantity of the money increases.
I had breakfast with an NFL head coach last week, and he shook his head at the fiscal craziness, saying that average players are getting superstar money.
There were 112 players signed in free agency through the end of business last week. Only 28 of them were primary starters in 2007.
The annual list of signees has become a litany of older players (safety Sammy Knight and offensive linemen Alan Faneca and Damien Woody), players coming off injury (guard Justin Smiley, defensive tackle Chuck Darby and cornerback Jason Webster), players who have lost starting jobs (running back Chris Brown and defensive backs Drayton Florence and Tank Williams) and underachievers (offensive tackle Kwame Harris and wide receivers Jerry Porter and Keary Colbert).
In short, expendable commodities.
Talented young starters still in their 20s such as running back Michael Turner (Atlanta), linebackers Landon Johnson (Carolina) and Demorrio Williams (Kansas City), and safety Gibril Wilson (Oakland) in this year's class of free agents are few and far between every off-season.
You can count on the fingers of two hands the free agents this decade who have played to the level of the money and duration of the contract.
So the smart teams don't overreact to the market and offer superstar money to non-superstar players. You rarely get what you hope for ? and what you pay for ? in free agency. The smart teams don't sign contracts they will live to regret ? teams like Green Bay and Indianapolis.
__________________

SteelerFanInATL
03-23-2008, 09:30 AM
Smart NFL teams spend little in free agency!!!!! That has been the Steeler way for years. I guess the rest of the NFL is catching on to what it takes to be successful.

19ward86
03-23-2008, 09:34 AM
Great post, im a firm believer that big players dont always make big plays. The league is designed for no one to dominate no matter what, Even though it seems the cowboys spend $300 million a year on players they still dont win championships, its been nearly 15 yrs since theyve been to the big game. Everyone expects the Browns to come out and be a dominate team, 2 people have already come up to me to tell me that the browns will sweep the steelers next season and maybe win the superbowl, are they crazy??? I dont remember the Redskins winning a superbowl after they spend around $40million on players during the FA period.

Galax Steeler
03-23-2008, 09:52 AM
Look at our signings this year we didn't spend alot and we got 3 players.

silver & black
03-23-2008, 11:30 AM
You might not belive this, but I agree.

But... sometimes you gotta do what you gotta do.

"You can't buy championships". Really? '97 Florida Marlins... if that wasn't a bought and paid for championship, I don't know what was.

revefsreleets
03-24-2008, 09:29 AM
But that was 11 years ago, now...by far the exception and not the rule.

silver & black
03-24-2008, 12:32 PM
But that was 11 years ago, now...by far the exception and not the rule.

I know. Just pointing out that it can be done.

stlrtruck
03-24-2008, 12:42 PM
I know. Just pointing out that it can be done.

That's also in baseball. And let's face it, it's a lot easier to put a bunch of pre-madonna superstar cry-babies on a baseball field and have them win a championship, then it is to put 22 of the same types as starters on one team and have them play as a cohesive unit in football.

silver & black
03-24-2008, 12:49 PM
That's also in baseball. And let's face it, it's a lot easier to put a bunch of pre-madonna superstar cry-babies on a baseball field and have them win a championship, then it is to put 22 of the same types as starters on one team and have them play as a cohesive unit in football.

If it wasn't for the salary cap, I'm sure it could be done in football just as easily.

steeltheone
03-24-2008, 01:17 PM
This is why drafting is so important! Along with team and organization consistency. We keep the same philosophy with minor adjustments year in and out.

lilyoder6
03-24-2008, 01:49 PM
well when the expansion teams came into play car and texans.. they had to go out and buy ppl.... but in some cases u might need to go out and spend big money to get a team if half ur team are fa

stlrtruck
03-24-2008, 01:52 PM
If it wasn't for the salary cap, I'm sure it could be done in football just as easily.

I'd have to disagree with you on that one. I think once you get more than 2 pre-madonna's in one locker room - it starts tearing at the cohesiveness of a football team.

However, Mr. Danny "Boy" Snyder has tried in DC and it hasn't work. And oh, so has Jerry Jones.

Dino 6 Rings
03-24-2008, 03:11 PM
If it wasn't for the salary cap, I'm sure it could be done in football just as easily.

Agreed, the Salary Cap saved the NFL from the fiasco that is the FA market in baseball.

Dino 6 Rings
03-24-2008, 03:16 PM
I'd have to disagree with you on that one. I think once you get more than 2 pre-madonna's in one locker room - it starts tearing at the cohesiveness of a football team.

However, Mr. Danny "Boy" Snyder has tried in DC and it hasn't work. And oh, so has Jerry Jones.

Jerry Jones has "tried it" in a way, but in reality, he won 3 superbowls with the draft, Aikman, Smith, Irving, all draft picks.

Football is the kind of game where one "hired gun" can make a difference if it fixes a weakness on your team. A hired gun CB like a Deon Sanders, can fix a hole, a hired gun like Moss, can add points and a "deep threat". Hired guns, can fix a need on Oline, but to build an entire team, with that type of player, I don't know if that would work to win a title. You need to have a philosphy that the entire team follows and adheres to, a team mentality, no "me" guys, you really need "Us and We" guys to win it all. Giants are the perfect example. There two biggest "me" guys, didn't play this year, Tiki and Shockey, and they had to be a "team" to get it done. Plax was a "me" guy here, but the NY media ate him up and he settled down big time.

verks36
03-24-2008, 03:21 PM
this is so stupid it is the players you get in free agency IE patriots Randy Moss, Dante, Wes and Thomas

fansince'76
03-24-2008, 03:45 PM
this is so stupid it is the players you get in free agency IE patriots Randy Moss, Dante, Wes and Thomas

And what did that "get" them besides a gigantic choke job in the SB, exactly? For all the spending they did in FA last offseason, they got one game further in the playoffs this past season than they did in '06 before choking their asses off. In the meantime, the Giants picked up one nondescript FA and won it all. And this was after all the naysayers declared the Giants' season D.O.A. before it even started due to Tiki Barber's retirement and were handing the Lombardi to the Pats* before the ink on Moss' one-year rent-a-player deal dried. Your statement only strengthens the article's point, it doesn't diminish it.

millwalldavey
03-24-2008, 08:12 PM
I sometimes think that one flyer on a big ticket FA every few years or so may not be the worst thing... as long as its a Steelers type guy.