PDA

View Full Version : AFC North Mailbag


CantStop85
08-22-2008, 07:46 PM
AFC North mailbag

August 22, 2008 1:00 PM


Posted by ESPN.com's James Walker

John from Manchester, NJ writes: What do you think about the Steelers defense this season. They have to corner I would consider a #1 guy and their defensive line is old. Do you think they will be as dominant as last season?

James Walker: Thanks for the question, John. In watching both preseason games the easy answer is that Pittsburgh will not be as dominant as it was last year. But I don't overreact to what I see in the preseason. Pittsburgh's defense will bring pressure and be physical like it always has. They're just not doing it when the games don't matter. The age on the defensive line is a concern, but the Steelers will simply rotate a lot of players in and out. The key will be in young players such as LaMarr Woodley, Lawrence Timmons, or even someone like Bryant McFadden, to step up and fill key roles.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

James from Orangevale, Calif. writes: James love your blog. I watched every scrap of video on the net I could find on Rashard Mendenhall and his highlights look like his preseason - lots of speed with no power. Running between the tackles is not his forte & I doubt he will develop a 'taste' for it. The steelers lost their ability to impose their will on a defense when Cowher left, your thoughts?

James Walker: That is a very good observation, James. And great name by the way! One of the few knocks on Mendenhall coming in was that he didn't run hard enough between the tackles and relied on his athleticism too often, as opposed to just lowering his shoulders and getting the tough yards. In the NFL, everyone is athletic. So Mendenhall will have to learn to make just one cut and lower his pads. But he's a young back with tremendous physical gifts. He just needs to adjust to the pro game and be coached up a bit in that department. Keep representing our good name, James.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dave from Baltimore writes: With the current QB situation in Baltimore, would it be beneficial for Baltimore to consider bringing in Culpepper for a visit?

James Walker: This is a great question, Dave. Bringing in a starting quarterback right before the regular season could be a major undertaking for a team, especially if it's not an injury or emergency situation. But at the same time Baltimore's three quarterbacks continue to tread water. From being around the team at different times this offseason, I get the sense they will stick with what they have and hope for the best.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Mario from Pittsburgh, PA writes: The Steelers' O-Line troubles are well documented. I've heard rumors of the Steelers signing former Brownies' center LeCharles Bentley and moving him over to guard to fill the massive shoes left by Alan Faneca. Any truth to the rumors?

James Walker: Super Mario, it is true that the Steelers showed preliminary interest in Bentley when he was first released in June. But "preliminary" interest in the NFL doesn't mean much more than the team asking around to see how is Bentley's knee, and what type of asking price is he looking for? Bentley has not worked out or taken a physical with Pittsburgh, so until it reaches that point it's just speculation. But I think Bentley is on the short list of a lot of teams -- including the Steelers -- if an interior offensive lineman goes down.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kris from Fairfield, Ohio writes: I was just wondering what your take on the supposed move of Bobbie Williams to center and then sliding Andrews to guard putting Willie back in. I have coached offensive line at the high school level for years and I am a believer in putting the best five on the field and in my opinion the best five does not include Eric Ghichic(sp?). What are your thoughts on this?

James Walker: The Bengals have been discussing it, Kris. They also used it a tiny bit in the preseason. But until I see Marvin Lewis use it consistently, it's difficult to tell if this is a viable option for the Bengals in the regular season. Andrews has experience at guard and obviously he is a great right tackle when healthy. So the key is if Bobbie Williams can make the adjustment from guard to center.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

John from Cleveland writes: Even as a Browns fan, i won't deny that the Monday Night Football game was a terrible outing for Cleveland. Penalties, careless mistakes, and big plays by the Giants all crushed the Browns. Do you think that these resulted from the fact that they were on preseason prime-time?

James Walker: It was more the team they were playing than the bright lights in the stadium, John. I live in Cleveland, and that one-plus quarter of preseason football has been the talk of the town all week. The fact that the starters didn't show up was somewhat of a wake-up call. But it's not a reason to think the Browns will go 4-12.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ken from Ann Arbor writes: If the charges against C Henry are dropped and he was suspended for those particular charges, will the league still up-hold his 4 game suspension, or will he be reinstated for the opener?

James Walker: Yes, Ken. The NFL is its own entity and will uphold Chris Henry's suspension. In fact, Henry had a pending year-long suspension revoked because charges were dropped. So he's lucky to be serving just four games. The league can make its own judgments as it sees fit. Basically, the league used Henry's past transgressions and the fact that he placed himself in a precarious position as reasons to slap him on the wrist.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Derick Young from Casper, WY writes: What do you think of the re-signing of Farrior? Also, what is your insight with the hold off with Marvel Smith, why not sign him?

James Walker: I'm a little surprised by the James Farrior signing, Derick. It bucked two trends for the Pittsburgh Steelers. First, they usually do not extend aging players. Second, Pittsburgh has a talented young linebacker in Lawrence Timmons waiting his turn to fill Farrior's spot. But this is an indication that Farrior's locker room leadership means a lot to the organization, plus he's still a good player. As far as Smith goes, the team doesn't want to pump any more money into the offensive line, because a major overhaul may be in order for 2009 if this unit struggles again.
http://myespn.go.com/blogs/afcnorth/0-0-226/AFC-North-mailbag.html

RoethlisBURGHer
08-23-2008, 10:16 AM
The steelers lost their ability to impose their will on a defense when Cowher left, your thoughts?

We didn't lose that ability when Cowher left, we lost that ability when Bettis retired.

stillers4me
08-23-2008, 10:33 AM
We didn't lose that ability when Cowher left, we lost that ability when Bettis retired.

Oh ye of little faith............. :sofunny:

RoethlisBURGHer
08-23-2008, 12:18 PM
Oh ye of little faith............. :sofunny:

LOL, I have faith...I just don't agree with the statment that Cowher's leaving left us unable to "impose out will" aka run hard between the tackles.

Who have we had for that power run game since Bettis left? John Kuhn, Najeh Davenport. Neither of them could get it done in that apect of the game.

When Bettis retired, so did our abiliy to pound the tough yards on the ground because we didn't have a back who could do it.

I hope Mendenhall becomes that back. He's got the talent, now he just has to learn how to run between the tackles.

tony hipchest
08-23-2008, 12:35 PM
LOL, I have faith...I just don't agree with the statment that Cowher's leaving left us unable to "impose out will" aka run hard between the tackles.

Who have we had for that power run game since Bettis left? John Kuhn, Najeh Davenport. Neither of them could get it done in that apect of the game.

When Bettis retired, so did our abiliy to pound the tough yards on the ground because we didn't have a back who could do it.

I hope Mendenhall becomes that back. He's got the talent, now he just has to learn how to run between the tackles.power run game = faneca + hartings + bruener + tuman + krieder + ward punching holes for a once in a lifetime back like jerome to run through.

6 of those guys are gone (5 starters). the power run game has been replaced. coaches shuch as cowher and shottenhiemer have been replaced in the league. it is kind of a dinosaur of an offense from the late 70's and 80's philosophy.

it has been replaced with a franchise quarterback and a power passing game, much like the one the steelers evolved to in the late 70's.

anyways, cowher and jerome would be much more successful in the post season with a power pass game as opposed to a power run game. their success pre-ben and post ben prove that.

xfl2001fan
08-23-2008, 12:58 PM
anyways, cowher and jerome would be much more successful in the post season with a power pass game as opposed to a power run game. their success pre-ben and post ben prove that.

I believe your argument is flawed.

A power run game + Ben scares me far more than Ben + FWP and smaller backs. The issue that they have to contend with now is they are transforming from a power-run team to a team that wants to pass more (and evolve into something with West Coast guidelines)

That's like asking a defense to go from a 3-4 to a 4-3. Huge difference in philosophy and requires a different type of player (particularly amongst the Line.)

The difference in the Steelers success isn't in the type of run/pass style used...but the difference in the QB behind center.

I have very little doubt that the Steelers would have beaten the Cowboys in the SB if they had Ben behind center as opposed to Neil (K. Smith's best friend) O'donnel.

tony hipchest
08-23-2008, 01:25 PM
The difference in the Steelers success isn't in the type of run/pass style used...but the difference in the QB behind center.

I have very little doubt that the Steelers would have beaten the Cowboys in the SB if they had Ben behind center as opposed to Neil (K. Smith's best friend) O'donnel.my argument is not flawed. you pretty much nailed it. ben is a power passer much like bradshaw was (and favre/elway were).

2005 proves that. make the playoff run and put up points with the passing game and seal the deal by grinding it out. many times cowher lacked that power passer (can even call it a franchise qb if you want to) and tried to put up points and grind it out with the run in the 1st half. it became predictable and teams had years to develop effective gameplans against it.

if you disagree with that, i think its really over semantics.

xfl2001fan
08-23-2008, 01:29 PM
In this case, it was a difference in what we felt was a power passer. It seemed (to me) like you were inferring that the Steelers needed to resort more to a power passing game (i.e. pass much more and use it to set up the run) than just having a better QB. Sorry for the confusion.

lilyoder6
08-23-2008, 01:35 PM
well 2 of those guys just left this off-season so we don't rly know yet if they should be included...

Elvis
08-23-2008, 02:12 PM
I am afraid that I have to agree with most of what this guy said....

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

James from Orangevale, Calif. writes: James love your blog. I watched every scrap of video on the net I could find on Rashard Mendenhall and his highlights look like his preseason - lots of speed with no power. Running between the tackles is not his forte & I doubt he will develop a 'taste' for it. The steelers lost their ability to impose their will on a defense when Cowher left, your thoughts?

43Hitman
08-23-2008, 02:31 PM
power run game = faneca + hartings + bruener + tuman + krieder + ward punching holes for a once in a lifetime back like jerome to run through.


There has never been a back with the durability and feet like Jerome. Most big backs last 4 years tops. I agree with what your saying. I think if we had Jerome, in his prime with our current line, we would still pound the ball and be a ton more deadly with Ben and the receivers we have.

tony hipchest
08-23-2008, 02:36 PM
In this case, it was a difference in what we felt was a power passer. It seemed (to me) like you were inferring that the Steelers needed to resort more to a power passing game (i.e. pass much more and use it to set up the run) than just having a better QB. Sorry for the confusion.i was inferring to passing to set up the run, but not in the "west coast" sense. im more talking about having a high ypa w/ fewer throws as opposed to dink and dunk replacing the run game.

with kordell, the run was necessary to set up the run, and play action/ threat of a scramble, opened up the run game.

with ben, they could come out passing 9/11 in the 1st half for 2 td and 150 yds and grind it out in the 2nd half.

with my version of the power passing game, you are ok with runs of 2 and 3 yds on 1st and 2nd down and you have to go spread offense on 3rd to pick up 5 (or much much more.)

stillers4me
08-23-2008, 02:41 PM
Wow ........2 preseason games and Mendenhall is a draft bust. Amazing.

Galax Steeler
08-24-2008, 07:30 AM
Wow ........2 preseason games and Mendenhall is a draft bust. Amazing.

:toofunny::toofunny:

43Hitman
08-24-2008, 07:35 AM
Wow ........2 preseason games and Mendenhall is a draft bust. Amazing.

I wasn't trying to imply that at all. I love the Menedhall pick and think he is going to be an asset to this team. Was just doing a bit of wishful thinking is all. You have to admit, if we'd had Ben in the 90's there might be another trophy or two in the case.