PDA

View Full Version : Arabic T-shirt case settlement


SteelersMongol
01-07-2009, 10:38 PM
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- JetBlue Airways and two TSA screeners will pay $240,000 to settle an Iraqi man's claim he was denied access to a flight until he covered a T-shirt that read in English and Arabic, "We Will Not be Silent."

In the settlement, JetBlue and the TSA screeners deny any wrongdoing, saying they only wanted to resolve the 2-year-old federal lawsuit.

But Raed Jarrar, an Iraqi who immigrated to the United States three years ago, cast the settlement as a victory, saying the payout would discourage airlines and airport security officials from imposing restrictions in the future.

ACLU attorney Aden Fine, who represented Jarrar, also called it a victory. "A $240,000 award should send a clear and strong message to all TSA officials and to all airlines that what happened here is wrong and should not happen again," he said.

The TSA screeners -- Garfield Harris and Franco Trotta -- declined comment, referring questions to their attorneys, who also declined comment, and the TSA.

TSA spokesman Christopher White, while noting that the TSA was not a party to the suit, said "There is absolutely no intention to take disciplinary action against the employees involved."

The incident occurred August 12, 2006 -- two days after the United Kingdom revealed a plot to bomb planes to the United States had been foiled. In response, the United States imposed a ban on carry-on liquids, and raised the threat level at airports.

Jarrar, now 30, said he was attempting to travel on JetBlue flight 101 from New York's John F. Kennedy International Airport to Oakland, California, when he was approached by TSA officers. The officers told him he'd have to cover his T-shirt.

"When I asked why, one of the TSA officers said, 'Coming into an airport while wearing a T-shirt with Arabic letters on it was equivalent to going into a bank while wearing a shirt saying, 'I am a robber,' " Jarrar said.

Jarrar said he originally refused to cover up the shirt, first asking to speak to a supervisor, and asking if there was a law prohibiting Arabic shirts.

"I said, 'I think as a U.S. resident and taxpayer, I think it's my constitutional right [to express myself],' " said Jarrar, adding the T-shirt's message was not threatening.

Jarrar said he finally relented when it became obvious he couldn't get on the plane without complying.

The officials purchased a T-shirt for him to wear, he said.

"They had actually a discussion in front of me. One said, 'Let's buy an "I [heart] New York" shirt.' And another said, 'No, we can't take him from one extreme to another.' "

"I said, 'What makes you assume that I don't love New York?' "

Jarrar said they eventually bought him a "generic gray" T-shirt with the words "New York" on it. "They tried to say this is a compromise ... I said, 'It is not a compromise, you are denying me my rights,' " Jarrar said.

Airline officials also changed his seats without consulting him, forcing him to to sit in the back where flight attendants kept an eye on him, Jarrar claims.

According to court documents, TSA screener Trotta said he remembers Harris telling Jarrar he "had perhaps not made the best choice of clothing" given the events two days earlier. But "at no point in time did he ever request or order that the passenger change his shirt or suggest that his failure to do so" would keep him off the flight.

Jarrar said he is disappointed the TSA and airline did not apologize to him.

In a written statement to CNN, JetBlue said it was pleased with the settlement.

"The settlement amount represents a fraction of the amount originally sought by Mr. Jarrar," spokesman Bryan Baldwin said. "JetBlue continues to deny, outright, every critical aspect of Mr. Jarrar's version of events."

"At no time did anyone from JetBlue ever say he could not board the aircraft unless he changed his T-shirt," Baldwin said.

ACLU attorney Fine said Jarrar did not sue TSA directly because of "legal considerations." "It's much more difficult to sue a government agency than it is to sue the direct government employee that committed the unconstitutional act," he said.

But the JetBlue settlement should accomplish the same goal, he said.

"It's very difficult to bring these kinds of cases and to prevail on these kinds of cases, especially in a post 9/11 world in which airline officials and government officials have been given an extreme amount of latitude," Fine said.

Jarrar said the slogan on the T-shirt -- "We Will Not Be Silent" -- originated in Germany as a campaign against the Nazi repression. He said artists in New York have printed it in various languages.

http://edition.cnn.com/2009/US/01/07/jet.blue.settlement/index.html

What do you guys think?

I_Bleed_Black_And_Gold
01-08-2009, 03:37 AM
I think as long as it isn't vulgar, you can wear what to you want. Like it or not that is what many have fought and died over...

stlrtruck
01-08-2009, 11:44 AM
I appreciate his rights but common sense tells me that with the high level of terrorist threats to this country, the changing of the shirt could be for his own protection.

Imagine if he gets on that plane and someone cold profanityfilterprofanityfilterprofanityfilterprofa nityfilters him from behind because he got of his chair to go to the bathroom and while reaching for his wallet, the guy thought it was a gun or something.

I mean it could go both ways. The problem is that the ACLU wants to get their hands in everything.

fansince'76
01-08-2009, 11:48 AM
Eight members of the Irfan family from Alexandria,Va. were kicked off an Orlando-bound Airtran Airways flight after one of family allegedly uttered the word "bomb" while boarding the plane.

Yeah? It's been like that in airports for at least a couple of decades now, well before even 9/11. You don't say words like "bomb" in an airport, not even jokingly. And that goes for EVERYONE, not just Muslims. But, I'm sure they'll sue over it and win a nice chunk of change all the same.

Dr. Steel
01-08-2009, 11:58 AM
Norm: You were acting like a maniac and you threatened her with a bomb.
Greg Focker: No, I said I didn't have a bomb.
Norm: But you said bomb.
Greg Focker: I said, "It's not like I have a bomb".
Norm: You said "Bomb" on an airplane.
Greg Focker: What's wrong with saying 'Bomb' on an airplane?
Norm: You can't say 'Bomb' on an airplane!
Greg Focker: Bomb bomb bomb, bomb bomb bomb bomb bomb bomb bomb. You gonna arrest me? Bomb bomb bomb bomb! During the war I was a BOMBadier!

Hammer67
01-08-2009, 11:59 AM
Wow...it has gotten crazy. As someone who leans conservative on this issue, I do believe the TSA and airport security has gone a little overboard in some instances. On one hand, it's quite dumb to subject an elderly couple obviously going on vacation to a "random" search (something I witnessed)....on the other hand, it is kind of difficult to make the jump to conclusion that the guy in the article's shirt was threatening...silly on both counts.

Where is the balance between safe and overly paranoid?

revefsreleets
01-09-2009, 08:42 AM
Another example of oversensitivity.

tony hipchest
01-09-2009, 08:53 AM
"A buh...?

Not a buh...a bomb.

Leslie Neilson- Airplane!