PDA

View Full Version : bho posts muslims in the DHS


Vincent
10-22-2009, 10:44 PM
Arif Alikhan was appointed as assistant secretary for the Office of Policy Development at the Department of Homeland Security. http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2009/06/obama-appointment-arif-ali-khan-asst-secretary-dhs.html Unbelievable. A fox developing policy for the hen house.

It gets worse. Janet Napolitano swore-in Kareem Shora, a devout Muslim, who was born in Damascus, Syria and is ADC National Executive Director as a member of the Homeland Security Advisory Council. ADC is the face of Hamas in the US and the point organization to hunt down and harass critics of muslims. The wolves are herding the sheep.

For more exciting insight into the affiliations of these individuals, go here http://dalesdesigns.net/2DM.htm

MACH1
10-23-2009, 12:11 AM
Why does this not surprise me.

I can't wait till this dumb ass they call president is out of office.

tony hipchest
10-23-2009, 12:28 AM
spam never goes bad, does it?

MACH1
10-23-2009, 12:33 AM
Neither does the koolaid.

devilsdancefloor
10-23-2009, 12:34 AM
spam never goes bad, does it?

it does they just recan it and call it spam lite :)

KeiselPower99
10-23-2009, 09:36 AM
I wonder what kinda KoolAid Obama supporters like?

revefsreleets
10-23-2009, 10:50 AM
I was not aware that all Muslims were now considered terrorists...that is, essentially, what is being said here.

Steelboy84
10-23-2009, 10:58 AM
Arif Alikhan was appointed as assistant secretary for the Office of Policy Development at the Department of Homeland Security. http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2009/06/obama-appointment-arif-ali-khan-asst-secretary-dhs.html Unbelievable. A fox developing policy for the hen house.

It gets worse. Janet Napolitano swore-in Kareem Shora, a devout Muslim, who was born in Damascus, Syria and is ADC National Executive Director as a member of the Homeland Security Advisory Council. ADC is the face of Hamas in the US and the point organization to hunt down and harass critics of muslims. The wolves are herding the sheep.

For more exciting insight into the affiliations of these individuals, go here http://dalesdesigns.net/2DM.htm

This is so sad. But as soon as I say the GOP is full of hate mongers, you're going to get upset. Then you wonder why only 20% of people have the guts to call themselves Republicans. Who cares what religion someone is? All religion is man made anyway. You don't have to be religious to serve God.

http://i673.photobucket.com/albums/vv99/atlkid666/thread-fail-stamp.gif

Steelboy84
10-23-2009, 10:59 AM
Why does this not surprise me.

I can't wait till this dumb ass they call president is out of office.

The dumbass is sitting in Texas where he belongs. :flap:

GBMelBlount
10-23-2009, 11:08 AM
Well Steelboy, this choice perhaps proves your earlier assertion that liberals are more inclusive.

After all, they are the clear choice of terrorists, murderers, rapists and pedophiles. :chuckle:

MACH1
10-23-2009, 12:13 PM
The dumbass is sitting in Texas where he belongs. :flap:

Wait till you grow up and get a real job. So you can enjoy working your ass off for 40% of your paycheck. Its called spreading the wealth. That is if you can find a job.

Of course you could just sit back and enjoy all the freebie promises that the rest of us pay for.

Vincent
10-23-2009, 03:01 PM
I was not aware that all Muslims were now considered terrorists...that is, essentially, what is being said here.

What was said is that two devout muslims were appointed to influential positions in the DHS. Nothing was said or implied about the balance of islam.

Apparently the point of the post was missed. Two "devout" muslims are now advising on policy to the DHS.

When the word "devout" is applied to Christians or Jews, what comes to mind? "Fundamentalist". The same word should mean the same thing when applied to a muslim. When we think of "fundamentalist" in the muslim context, what comes to mind? I won't go straight to "terrorist". Rather I'll go to the clerics, organizations, and governments that tacitly approve of terrorism, and indeed instigate muslims to act.

Perhaps news that some from that mindset being appointed to advise those charged with protecting us from same doesn't alarm you. The appointments are tantamount to making similar appointments of Japanese Americans in another "global contingency operation". History reminds us that the American Japanese population was interned during that "operation". And no, I'm not suggesting that the muslim population should be rounded up, although applying the same logic the dems used in the other "global contingency operation", the case could be made.

Both appointments indicate either at best, a stunning naiveté on the "administration's" part, or worse the continuation of something that has been very loosely articulated as "change". Given the characters that have been appointed to other posts, especially the legion of "czars", I'm inclined to go with the latter. Further to that inclination is the choice of a Kareem Shora of Damascus, Syria who is ADC National Executive Director. The ADC is the "happy face" of Hamas and Hezbollah in the US. And those folks are indeed terrorists.

This is so sad. But as soon as I say the GOP is full of hate mongers, you're going to get upset. Then you wonder why only 20% of people have the guts to call themselves Republicans.

What does this have to do with "Republicans"?

CantStop85
10-23-2009, 03:28 PM
When the word "devout" is applied to Christians or Jews, what comes to mind? "Fundamentalist". The same word should mean the same thing when applied to a muslim. When we think of "fundamentalist" in the muslim context, what comes to mind? I won't go straight to "terrorist". Rather I'll go to the clerics, organizations, and governments that tacitly approve of terrorism, and indeed instigate muslims to act.

Then let's just keep all religiously-affiliated people out of government office. :noidea:

Only half-kidding. :chuckle:

fansince'76
10-23-2009, 03:37 PM
Who cares what religion someone is?

Our enemies do.

revefsreleets
10-23-2009, 03:39 PM
I'm beginning to wonder what I'm even doing on this board.

The Nisei interned in WWII was one of the WORST ideas the US ever had...there is ZERO evidence that even a SINGLE Japanese American was conspiring with the enemy and that they were anything other than the most loyal of Americans.

One of the main reasons, IF NOT THE MAIN reason there have been no real terrorist attacks on US soil of anything approaching the magnitude of 9/11 is that we don't "homegrow" terrorists...so I find it almost inconceivable that, not only do we have virtually NO homegrown terrorists, but that we would find the one or two and put them in positions of power.

You guys GOTTA lay off the Beck, man...

GBMelBlount
10-23-2009, 04:02 PM
Steeltwink84

"Who cares what religion someone is?"

Evil conservative '76

"Our enemies do".

Owned. :applaudit:

Vincent
10-23-2009, 05:28 PM
The Nisei interned in WWII was one of the WORST ideas the donkeys ever had...there is ZERO evidence that even a SINGLE Japanese American was conspiring with the enemy and that they were anything other than the most loyal of Americans..

I quite agree. I also noted that none were appointed to positions of responsibility to make the obvious point that we shouldn't appoint those sympathetic to our current enemies.

Our little muslim friends are quite the opposite of the Nisei, however. They're busy, busy, busy. http://www.amazon.com/Third-Terrorist-Connection-Oklahoma-Bombing/dp/0785261036 http://www.fas.org/irp/world/iraq/956-tni.htm

Three books I would recommend to disabuse one of the notion that islamic terror is under control in the US are http://www.amazon.com/Day-Islam-Annihilation-America-Western/dp/1591025087 http://www.amazon.com/Stealth-Jihad-Radical-Subverting-America/dp/1596985569 and http://www.amazon.com/Muslim-Mafia-Underworld-Conspiring-Islamize/dp/1935071106/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1256332026&sr=1-1

One of the main reasons, IF NOT THE MAIN reason there have been no real terrorist attacks on US soil of anything approaching the magnitude of 9/11 is that we don't "homegrow" terrorists.

Really?

http://www.canadafreepress.com/2007/cover052107.htm http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,281074,00.html http://factsdispellies.com/blog1.php/2009/02/20/35-islamic-terrrorist-training-compounds http://www.christianaction.org/may-2009/south-carolina-tv-investigates-radical-islamic-compound.aspx http://www.fitsnews.com/2009/05/08/welcome-to-islamville-sc/ http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1842687/posts and on and on and on and...

so I find it almost inconceivable that, not only do we have virtually NO homegrown terrorists, but that we would find the one or two and put them in positions of power.

"Virtually"? That's a comfort. "Sir, our technicians detect virtually no radiation in your home from the bomb". "Honey, there's virtually no radiation. You and the kids should just get wigs.". :chuckle:

Y'know Rev, I'm not suggesting they conducted a search to find terrorists to post in the DHS. Why would they? They have appointed men of the same feather to influence policy that sets the table for actual terrorists to operate. Yes, I did say that. It goes on all over the world.

You guys GOTTA lay off the Beck, man...

Beck? Oh, Glenn Beck. What does he have to do with this? :noidea:

theplatypus
10-23-2009, 06:37 PM
Didn't vincent start that asinine thread claiming Crumpler intentionally hurt Troy?

Vincent
10-23-2009, 07:54 PM
Didn't vincent start that asinine thread claiming Crumpler intentionally hurt Troy?

Indeed he did.

If you'll recall the thread, I said "You make the call". I offered no opinion until into the thread, and mine was based on what I saw on the tape. I also posted high rez pics that support the point.

What is asinine about seeking the opinions of other fans on the injury to Troy. Is your point that we shouldn't seek or offer opinions on these boards? Or is it that our opinions should be aligned to yours?

But having reviewed your threads, I see that I need to put much more thought and preparation forth before posting.

http://forums.steelersfever.com/search.php?searchid=240041

You've certainly illuminated our paths with your threads.

theplatypus
10-23-2009, 08:00 PM
Indeed he did.

If you'll recall the thread, I said "You make the call". I offered no opinion until into the thread, and mine was based on what I saw on the tape. I also posted high rez pics that support the point.

What is asinine about seeking the opinions of other fans on the injury to Troy. Is your point that we shouldn't seek or offer opinions on these boards? Or is it that our opinions should be aligned to yours?

But having reviewed your threads, I see that I need to put much more thought and preparation forth before posting.

http://forums.steelersfever.com/search.php?searchid=240041

You've certainly illuminated our paths with your threads.

From your link it appears that you tried to find threads started by me and failed. Out of 200 posts or so I've started 3 threads, one of which is the Steelers forum right now. It seems that failure is a reoccurring theme for you. Was it public school or the short bus for you?:chuckle:

Vincent
10-23-2009, 08:35 PM
From your link it appears that you tried to find threads started by me and failed. Out of 200 posts or so I've started 3 threads, one of which is the Steelers forum right now. It seems that failure is a reoccurring theme for you. Was it public school or the short bus for you?:chuckle:

I didn't "try to find"; the site returned your stats. You, apparently can't read.

Your "200 or so posts" indicate a kindred intellect to young Steeltwink84 who lurks about in self inflicted embarrassment. Call him. He'll come to you.

theplatypus
10-23-2009, 08:38 PM
Is this where I'm supposed to get upset?

MasterOfPuppets
10-24-2009, 03:49 AM
lets see...first it was obama was a muslim terrorist...then it was obama was funding terrorist...now it's he's hiring terrorist in the whitehouse....:toofunny:

GBMelBlount
10-24-2009, 07:32 AM
lets see...first it was obama was a muslim terrorist...then it was obama was funding terrorist...now it's he's hiring terrorist in the whitehouse....:toofunny:

If you were on SteelersFever before the election, the big concern was actually about Obama being a closet socialist....... :nana:

GBMelBlount
10-24-2009, 09:41 AM
He's certainly out of the closet now. :chuckle:

Indeed.

We haven't seen the:

"Panic!!!!!! :shout: "

response on this topic for quite a while. :toofunny:

Vincent
10-24-2009, 01:41 PM
If you were on SteelersFever before the election, the big concern was actually about Obama being a closet socialist....... :nana:

NO!!! The hell you say! A socialist???!!! :toofunny::rofl:

Our baracka hussein obama, a socialist???!!!

Steelboy84
10-29-2009, 11:49 AM
Well Steelboy, this choice perhaps proves your earlier assertion that liberals are more inclusive.

After all, they are the clear choice of terrorists, murderers, rapists and pedophiles. :chuckle:

fail

Steelboy84
10-29-2009, 11:51 AM
Wait till you grow up and get a real job. So you can enjoy working your ass off for 40% of your paycheck. Its called spreading the wealth. That is if you can find a job.

Of course you could just sit back and enjoy all the freebie promises that the rest of us pay for.

The top bracket under Bush was 35%. If your state tax is between 4-5%, that's 40 right there.

You were saying? :flap:

Steelboy84
10-29-2009, 11:52 AM
I didn't "try to find"; the site returned your stats. You, apparently can't read.

Your "200 or so posts" indicate a kindred intellect to young Steeltwink84 who lurks about in self inflicted embarrassment. Call him. He'll come to you.

You and your pitiful party are embarrassments old man. :rofl:

X-Terminator
10-29-2009, 12:01 PM
The top bracket under Bush was 35%. If your state tax is between 4-5%, that's 40 right there.

You were saying? :flap:

Evidently math is not your strong suit.

He said working for 40% of your paycheck. That means 60% going to the government.

You were saying?

Vincent
10-29-2009, 12:06 PM
You and your pitiful party are embarrassments old man. :rofl:

You, young twink aren't in a position to comment on mine or anyone else's age or political affiliation. Your "contributions" to these discussions, while sometimes amusing, have been noted by many here to be void of intellectual value.

Steelboy84
10-29-2009, 12:11 PM
[QUOTE=Vincent;690502]You, young twink aren't in a position to comment on mine or anyone else's age or political affiliation. You "contributions" to these discussions, while sometimes amusing, have been noted by many here to be void of intellectual value.[/QUO

That's nice. God I hope I'm not this grumpy when I get "old".

Steelboy84
10-29-2009, 12:13 PM
Evidently math is not your strong suit.

He said working for 40% of your paycheck. That means 60% going to the government.

You were saying?

Evidently its not yours.

If 35% of your check plus another 5% state tax goes to taxes, that's 40%.

"That means 60% going to the government."

Gee, you don't say. :sofunny:

MACH1
10-29-2009, 12:13 PM
The top bracket under Bush was 35%. If your state tax is between 4-5%, that's 40 right there.

You were saying? :flap:

Like I said grow up first and take some reading comp class's while your at it.
To make it simple for you, for every $100 you bust your ass for, you will only take $40 of that home if your lucky.
On top of that the price of electricity will skyrocket (not my words), food prices will go threw the ceiling especially if it has sugar in it, fuel prices will go up again, and you'll die standing in line waiting to see a dr. when you get sick.

Then try and find a job. Looks like you'll be stuck at mommy and daddy's house for a while. :coffee:

Steelboy84
10-29-2009, 12:14 PM
Like I said grow up first and take some reading comp class's while your at it.
To make it simple for you, for every $100 you bust your ass for, you will only take $40 of that home if your lucky.
On top of that the price of electricity will skyrocket (not my words), food prices will go threw the ceiling especially if it has sugar in it, fuel prices will go up again, and you'll die standing in line waiting to see a dr. when you get sick.

Then try and find a job. Looks like you'll be stuck at mommy and daddy's house for a while. :coffee:

lol

You old people are so funny. And so grumpy.

MACH1
10-29-2009, 12:14 PM
Evidently its not yours.

If 35% of your check plus another 5% state tax goes to taxes, that's 40%.

"That means 60% going to the government."

Gee, you don't say. :sofunny:

Are you really that dense? :doh:

Steelboy84
10-29-2009, 12:29 PM
Are you really that dense? :doh:

Are you really that angry? lol

On a message board?

Steelboy84
10-29-2009, 12:46 PM
Owned. :applaudit:

:coffee:

MACH1
10-29-2009, 12:53 PM
:coffee:

Keep drinking that kool aid. Your gonna need it!

Steelboy84
10-29-2009, 12:54 PM
Keep drinking that kool aid. Your gonna need it!

That's nice. No rant you make is going to change a thing. Keep on with those "19th century" ideals and we'll keep moving on with the 21st century.

:thumbsup:

MACH1
10-29-2009, 12:57 PM
That's nice. No rant you make is going to change a thing. Keep on with those "19th century" ideals and we'll keep moving on with the 21st century.

:thumbsup:

You stay in your dream world while I live out here in the real one.

Kum ba yah

Steelboy84
10-29-2009, 12:59 PM
You stay in your dream world while I live out here in the real one.

Kum ba yah

:yawn:

revefsreleets
10-29-2009, 02:42 PM
Anyway...back on task....

It was a goal of this administration to be a little more diverse, and diverse naturally means the inclusion of some Muslims. In fact, if I'm not mistaken, one of the stated goals was the inclusion of Muslims.

This is a PC move, and as such is always a little suspect in that these people may not actually be the most qualified overall, just the most qualified MUSLIM candidates for the positions at a time the administration is actively pursuing Muslim people to fill government positions, but I don't see anything particularly nefarious in that, and they certainly are not terrorists simply because they are Muslim.

On a side note, Steelboy has QUITE a bit of growing up to do...maybe reading these forums will prompt him to do a little of his own research and start thinking on his own, perhaps enlighten the boy a bit....

X-Terminator
10-29-2009, 05:17 PM
Evidently its not yours.

If 35% of your check plus another 5% state tax goes to taxes, that's 40%.

"That means 60% going to the government."

Gee, you don't say. :sofunny:

How in the world does 40% = 60%? In Bizarro World? Math STILL isn't your strong suit, obviously.

Let's break this down further.

If you are only going to be able to KEEP 40% of your paycheck, that means 60% is going to the government. Or 60 cents out of every dollar you earn going to the government.

And I'M the one who doesn't know what I'm talking about?

MasterOfPuppets
10-29-2009, 05:40 PM
How in the world does 40% = 60%? In Bizarro World? Math STILL isn't your strong suit, obviously.


so then in bizarro world, derrick anderson is a good qb with a descent completion percentage.....:scratchchin: