PDA

View Full Version : Why you shouldn't mess with the new Camaro.


steelerdude15
01-20-2010, 11:23 PM
http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/2010-camaro/1217269-planetlsx-com-2010-camaro-wrecked.html
The second post on LS1tech.com is funny, but click on the link on that forum to see more pics. You'll have to scroll down a little.

Bng_Hevn
01-23-2010, 07:28 PM
I was psyched when the talks of the new Camaro were started. I had a '99 Z28 and was planning to get a new one. After seeing it though, at least compared to the new Challenger, it falls short of being a muscle car. I sat in one the other day and it looks and feels more like a sports car. They won't let you drive one unless you're serious about buying it.

June of next year I'll be buying either a Challenger or a Charger. I'd like to get a Challenger but may have to get a Charger because I can't spend $38K on a car and not be able to haul the family on long trips.

MACH1
01-24-2010, 04:21 AM
http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/2010-camaro/1217269-planetlsx-com-2010-camaro-wrecked.html
The second post on LS1tech.com is funny, but click on the link on that forum to see more pics. You'll have to scroll down a little.

Why would I waste my time on that thing?

silver & black
01-24-2010, 11:07 AM
Why would I waste my time on that thing?

:thumbsup:... :chuckle:

Stlrs4Life
01-24-2010, 07:11 PM
LOL haters, that new camaro is sweet and selling pretty well.

steelerdude15
01-24-2010, 08:37 PM
Camaro is better than Challenger and Mustang, it out competes them both no issues... Ford is releasing the 5.0 again, but it's not the same one they had in the Foxbodies and 94-95 model years.

Bng_Hevn
01-24-2010, 09:26 PM
Camaro is better than Challenger and Mustang, it out competes them both no issues... Ford is releasing the 5.0 again, but it's not the same one they had in the Foxbodies and 94-95 model years.

You're going by the Car & Drive type magazines. There is such a fine line in regards to performance that you really can't lose in that respect with any of them so it comes down to what you like.

Personally I'd take a muscle car over a sports car. But that's just me.

steelerdude15
01-24-2010, 09:58 PM
You're going by the Car & Drive type magazines. There is such a fine line in regards to performance that you really can't lose in that respect with any of them so it comes down to what you like.
Haha, I'm not trying to be a d-bag at all, but the performance stats don't lie and I'm not referring to any magazine. I do agree it all comes down to what you like.

MACH1
01-25-2010, 12:11 AM
Haha, I'm not trying to be a d-bag at all, but the performance stats don't lie and I'm not referring to any magazine. I do agree it all comes down to what you like.

Go look up the "stats" of the new GT500.

pepsyman1
01-25-2010, 12:37 AM
Go look up the "stats" of the new GT500.

LOL The day hasn't come when I would even consider dropping 50 grand on a 4000lb Mustang! Someone ought to inform Ford that cars usually aren't manufactured with solid axles anymore... LOL

devilsdancefloor
01-25-2010, 12:26 PM
id rather walk then be caught in a government motors car

revefsreleets
01-25-2010, 12:37 PM
Of the 3, the Challenger hands down wins best "retro" muscle car as far as capturing the spirit of the 60's and 70's Detroit iron. That thing looks like it could roll down the street circa 1970 and fit right in...the Camaro probably least so of the 3, but at least they didn't ruin an old street rod like Pontiac did with the GTO.

I was a little disappointed since the 1967 SS Camaro (327 4-speed) is my all-time favorite muscle car...