View Full Version : Analyzing the O-Line: Pray for Four More Pounceys

12-15-2010, 06:39 PM
Analyzing the O-Line: Pray for Four More Pounceys
Posted on December 15, 2010 by JJ

If you watch the Steelers on a regular basis (and hey, if youíre checking out the Steelers Lounge, Iím guessing you do), you probably have noticed that even the play-by-play and color analysts that broadcast the games are well aware of the Steelersí biggest problem. At this point, you see multiple plays where a Steelersí offensive linemen is hanging his head, or, more usually, kicking the dirt after a missed block.

In fact, Iím convinced that the penguins in Antarctica are aware that the Steelersí offensive line is the teamís biggest weakness. But in watching Ben Roethlisberger, itís amazing how he can repeatedly turn disaster into success.

In the first half against the Bengals, Roethlisberger was dodging pass rushers almost every time he dropped back. Of his first 25 passes, Roethlisberger either was sacked or pressured on 15 of them. Despite the pressure, he managed to go 14-for-22 for 171 yards while being sacked three times. In the second half, Pittsburgh started holding more (and doing more three-step drops), which led to less pressure (although there were still two sacks).

Hereís how the numbers look:
Player Good Play Total Plays Pct Pressures Sacks
Johnson 3 3 100%
Spaeth 10 10 100%
Moore 7 7 100%
Pouncey 35 38 92.1%
Kemoeatu 35 38 92.1% 3
Adams 34 38 89.5% 3
Foster 34 38 89.5% 1 1
Scott 30 38 78.9% 6 1
Player Good Play Total Plays Pct
Pouncey 25 29 86.2%
Spaeth 23 27 85.2%
Foster 23 29 79.3%
Kemoeatu 23 29 79.3%
Essex 3 4 75.0%
Scott 21 29 72.4%
Adams 20 29 68.9%
Johnson 15 22 68.2%
Redman 2 3 66.7%
Player Good Play Total Plays Pct
Moore 7 7 100%
Pouncey 60 67 89.6%
Spaeth 33 37 89.2%
Kemoeatu 58 67 86.6%
Foster 57 67 85.1%
Adams 54 67 80.6%
Scott 51 67 76.1%
Essex 3 4 75.0%
Johnson 18 25 72.0%
Redman 2 3 66.7%

As far as the individual contributions, Maurkice Pouncey stood out again as the teamís best lineman. Pouncey isnít yet a dominating pass blocker, but when it comes to the run game, he is pretty darn close already. He is equally comfortable digging out defensive tackles (unless they are named Haloti Ngata) and locking up linebackers. Domata Petko and Pat Sims didnít prove nearly as troublesome. Petko and Sims only beat Pouncey clearly twice in the running game. Pounceyís also was caught up once in traffic and failed to get to a linebacker and there was another play where the linebackerís quick assessment of the play left Pouncey no time to get to him.

Pouncey may be the teamís best offensive lineman, but itís hard to say at this point that Flozell Adams isnít the teamís most important. If Pouncey went down, Doug Legursky could provide mediocre play at center. It wouldnít be as good as Pounceyís performance, but it probably wouldnít be a whole lot different than Justin Hartwigís play last year. But if Adams was injured again, there is no sure Plan B. Trai Essex would step in, but the drop-off from Adams to Essex would be much larger than that of Pouncey to Legursky

Speaking of Essex, Iíve seen a lot of speculation that itís time to try out Essex at left tackle in place of Jonathan Scott. Personally, I donít see that as a likely upgrade. There is no doubt that Scott is one of the worst left tackles in the league right now; heís a backup over his head as a starter. But there has been no indication that Essex would be any better. Playing the significantly easier position of right guard, Essex lost his job because of ineffectiveness. If Essex was dominating at guard, it would be a viable option to move him out to left tackle, but failed guards donít slide out to tackle. Failed tackles (like Essex) slide inside to guard. Going from right guard (where you often get help from the center) to left tackle is like jumping from driving your Hyundai to work to hopping into the Daytona 500.

And itís worth remembering that Essexís previous stints at left tackle (against the Colts in 2005 and the Jaguars playoff game in 2007) have not gone well. Thereís a chance that Essex could be as good as Scott, but that seems to be about the upside. So why would you shake up the line to hope to get an equivalent performance? And if Essex had to step in and replace Flozell Adams, you likely would get a Jonathan Scott-type performance from both left and right tackle.

Thatís not to say that watching Scott play isnít a stomach-churning experience. Once again on Sunday he was overmatched, and this was against a poor pass-rushing team. Thereís no real theme to Scottís problems on Sunday: he was bull-rushed back into Roethlisberger, he was beaten to the inside, he was beaten to the outside, he failed to pick up a looping pass rusher and he was flagged for holding. He was beaten about every way that is possible.

Flozell Adams looked a little less mobile than normal after returning from his sprained ankle, but considering he had a high-ankle sprain the week before, itís hard to be too upset. Adams biggest problem was getting to the second level to block, or maintain blocks, on linebackers. But thatís not a whole lot different than a normal week for Adams.

Ramon Foster isnít great, but he has been an improvement on Essexís play. Fosterís big problem occurs at the snap. He doesnít have a quick first step, so a defensive tackle can sometimes shoot the gap on him off the snap. Something that happened several times on Sunday. But if he gets his hands on his assignment, Foster has the strength to get some movement and push in the running game. Foster wasnít that bad in the passing game on Sunday either, but there was no in between when he struggled; when he was bad he was awful.

Chris Kemoeatu has put the nightmare of the Billsí game behind him, as heís apparently feeling healthier now. Kemoeatu even blew up a couple of Bengals on pull blocks. As mentioned before, Kemoeatu doesnít have much ability to redirect his momentum when pulling, but if you try to take him on, he will destroy you. The Bengals tried to take him on Ö with poor results.