PDA

View Full Version : Arians doesn't let critics alter philosophy


mesaSteeler
01-09-2011, 12:05 AM
Arians doesn't let critics alter philosophy
http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/sports/steelers/s_717321.html#
By Scott Brown
PITTSBURGH TRIBUNE-REVIEW
Sunday, January 9, 2011

The man who supposedly has an aversion to power football counts Bear Bryant, as tough and gruff as anyone that ever blew a whistle, among his most enduring coaching influences. He also played quarterback in a wishbone offense at Virginia Tech.

The man who would supposedly throw the ball on every down if given carte blanche had a back, Paul Palmer, lead the country in rushing one season when he coached at Temple. He also helped the Chiefs finish in the NFL's top five in rushing in two of the four seasons that he coached running backs in Kansas City.

So when Bruce Arians is asked about the perception that he doesn't like to run the ball, the Steelers' oft-criticized offensive coordinator references his past, including the season at Virginia Tech when he, sometimes, threw less than 10 passes a game.

"If you can line up and beat people up that's an easy way to win," said Arians, who tutored running backs for Bryant and Alabama in 1981-82, one of nine college or NFL teams for whom he has coached. "It doesn't happen very often in this league. If you can't pass it, you're dead, you lost. You better be able to score points and, sometimes, you can set up the run with the passing."

That philosophy figures to be on trial at least in the court of public opinion as much as it is on display Saturday when the Steelers, in pursuit of a seventh Lombardi Trophy, host an AFC divisional playoff game.

Arians has been a lightning rod for fan criticism since succeeding Ken Whisenhunt as the Steelers' offensive coordinator in 2007. He has been lambasted for questionable play-calling as well as the empty backfields and the four-wide receivers sets that don't fit the traditional definition of Steelers football.

When a report surfaced last January that Arians' firing could be imminent, FireBruceArians.com posed the question of possible replacements.

Dan Henning and Mike Mularkey were among the posts that followed.

So were "My 6-year-old niece" and "my shoe."

Criticism 'unfair, unwarranted'

Steelers coach Mike Tomlin later denied that he had been close to making a change at offensive coordinator or that quarterback Ben Roethlisberger had made an 11th-hour pitch that saved Arians' job.

"It's really a joke," Tomlin said last March.

Roethlisberger feels roughly the same way about the constant carping directed at Arians, whether it is on sports talk radio or Internet message boards.

"I think it's unfair, unwarranted because people don't know what goes on," Roethlisberger said of the inner workings of the Steelers' offense. "Listen, he would go into a game and if the run was there we would run the ball every single play. He has no problem running the ball. People don't understand that. They think he is strictly a passing guy. That's not true. He's wants to be the most productive offensive team that we can be."

Arians gets his share of suggestions on how best to do that in the form of letters that are sent to him at the Steelers' South Side practice facility.

"I read most of them," he said, "unless they start off with you a--hole."

Arians laughs, and what else can an offensive coordinator do? Perhaps nothing else in sports lends itself to second-guessing more than play-calling in football.

"In our business, whenever anything's wrong with the defense, it's the players," said Henning, who spent the last two seasons as the Miami Dolphins' offensive coordinator and held the same position with the Carolina Panthers from 2002-06. "I'm sure up there in Pittsburgh, whenever there's anything wrong with the offense, it's the (play) call."

What has probably made Arians even more of a target is the perception that he has moved the Steelers away from their roots, away from what made them great in the 1970s and even 2005 when they ran the ball 59.5 percent of the time during the regular season.

The phasing out of the traditional fullback under Arians may be more symbolic than substantial since the Steelers frequently use a tight end or running back Isaac Redman as a lead blocker for Rashard Mendenhall.

But to fans that still have a deep emotional attachment to the Steel Curtain years, it is akin to removing the Franco Harris Immaculate Reception statue from Pittsburgh International Airport.

The Steelers are still so associated with a smashmouth mentality that former NFL quarterback and current NFL Network analyst Joe Theismann said, "You're not going to see the Pittsburgh Steelers just light it up and drop back and throw. Every time they do that they get in trouble. They get away from who they are."

Line changes

If the Steelers have gotten away from a power running game part of it may be attributed to the offensive line and how its makeup has changed.

In 2005, when the Steelers were fifth in the NFL in rushing (138.9 yards per game), they started three former first-round picks up front as well as a second- and third-rounder.

They have started only two first-round picks guard Alan Faneca in 2007 and center Maurkice Pouncey this season since Arians took over as offensive coordinator.

And the Steelers finished third in rushing in 2007 and 11th this season.

"A lot of people think running the ball is easier than throwing it and that's not necessarily true sometimes," Arians said. "Last year, we were very explosive and we were highly criticized for the number of runs but it wasn't the number as much as the quality. We weren't tough enough in short-yardage and goal line and at the end of the game. I feel much better about those areas."

He better since team president Art Rooney II said after last season that the Steelers needed to run the ball more effectively in 2010, an edict seemingly directed at Tomlin and, by extension, Arians.

They have done that, at least statistically, but the Steelers' red-zone offense struggles have left Arians vulnerable to criticism.

They scored touchdowns just 48 percent of the time they drove inside their opponents' 20-yard line during the regular season, which ranked 23rd in the NFL.:banging::banging::banging::banging:

That represents a slight dip from last season (48.2 percent) when Arians got crucified for the offense's inability to finish drives.

"It's easy to point the finger at him because he's the one calling the plays," Steelers second-year wide receiver Mike Wallace said. "But as the same time, it's the execution not the play calls. It's just like playing quarterback. If things are going good, you're going to get the credit. If things go bad, you're going to take the blame."

That blame takes on an echo quality at a time when media has expanded greatly beyond its traditional form and given a voice to critics that contend Arians' tenure as the Steelers offensive coordinator shouldn't have lasted any longer than his other stint as an NFL offensive coordinator did (three seasons in Cleveland).

"You've got bloggers and tweeters and all of that baloney, so what you have to do is keep in contact with people that you trust, that have an idea of what you do because only about five percent of the people out there ever speak up and they're always the disgruntled ones," said Henning, who coached Arians for two seasons at Virginia Tech and remains close to him. "I think he's very capable of analyzing the players and determining what's best to do."

Arians said he has that circle of trust, a small group of coaches that he said can critique him without raw emotion entering the equation.

He said he is also able to tune out the negativity largely by accepting that it comes with the job.

To illustrate his point, Arians talked about the victory parade that the city of Pittsburgh held following the Steelers' Super Bowl victory two seasons ago. It came a couple of days after Roethlisberger led an eight-play, 78-yard touchdown drive with less than three minutes left in the game.

"At the parade, I thought they were booing," Arians said with a chuckle. "They were going Bruce."

Statisically speaking

Here is how the Steelers have fared in four major categories since Bruce Arians became the team's offensive coordinator in 2007. The Steelers rank among NFL teams is in parenthesis.
2007 2008 2009 2010
Rushing offense 135.3 (3) 105.6 (23) 112.1 (19) 120.2 (11)
Passing offense 191.9 (22) 206.3 (17) 259.2 (9) 225.1 (14)
Total offense 327.4 (17) 311.9 (22) 371.3 (7) 345.3 (14)
Scoring 24.6 (T9) 21.7 (20) 23.0 (12) 23.4 (12)



Scott Brown can be reached at sbrown@tribweb.com or 412-481-5432.

steelers33
01-09-2011, 12:24 AM
Good article, I definately think Arians gets some undeserved criticism because of the Steelers former identity of being a power running team. But the Steelers just can't do it because the lack of talent they have up front on the o-line so they have to go to passing more. But brutal honesty is that the Steelers offense has been average under his tenure, but they have been clutch in important times.

TOOLofSTEEL
01-09-2011, 12:32 AM
I like the fact... Considering Ben + the WRs this team has. That he tries to utilize that, especially given how the rules favor the passing game now-a-days. That he isn't just going. BLAH! This is Pittsburgh we are a running team! I like that he appear flexible in that respect.

That being said, he's an average OC. And we could get that same mentality from a different guy but with better play calling abilities if we looked for it, I'm sure.

Thats my knock on the guy is that we can do better, because at this point in his career. He's a known quantity. He's not going to push the envelope but so much. So it leaves a lot to be desired especially on a team as talented as this one, where the offense is the Achilles heel because his unit doesn't keep pace with the defense.

It has its moments. But its without question the weak link and thats a complement to the team really that THIS is our problem.

tony hipchest
01-09-2011, 12:54 AM
well said TOOLofSTEEL.

Arians gets his share of suggestions on how best to do that in the form of letters that are sent to him at the Steelers' South Side practice facility.

"I read most of them," he said, "unless they start off with you a--hole."



:toofunny:

so in other words he reads about 3 letters a week.

:applaudit:

MikeHaullace
01-09-2011, 01:22 AM
Bruce Arians...

Man. If anyone went into this season with more disgust (except for anyone that would call themselves "Fire Arians") for Arians's play calling, it was me.

Run, run, pass, punt.

Lather. Rinse. Repeat.

Nail-biter after nail-biter.

Here we are, going into the playoffs... Still not knowing who Pittsburgh faces next.

And I'm excited about this offense. I'm excited that it is starting to open up. I am excited that we finally have receivers that can get open.

I mean, I feel like Ben found his 'rhythm' (broken foot, y'all), and will be going into the playoffs, ready to pull his team on board and ride.

This team is converting third downs. This team is hitting the homerun ball. This team is getting yards on the ground when they need yards on the ground.

It's getting real, y'all. This team is real, real good. They look like they were beginning to hit stride going in. I hope the off week is more of a blessing to heal in order to win, rather a trump to their season, being out of sync.

Listen.

This team is going to compete. Arians is doing a great job overall. This offense would be much better with New England's O-Line. And this O-Line is really coming through, much more so than that putrid '08 squad. Remember those jokers? Psssh.

December football is over.

Now it gets serious.

Let 'em loose, Bruce. Let 'em loose.

You know that with this D rested, they're going to keep the score of the next game down to at least 14. Why not pitch a blowout to the tune of 38-10?

Let 'em loose, Bruce. Let 'em loose.

I can't stand it. I mean... I'm so excited. I... I just can't hide it.

I know. I know. I know what you're thinking.

And you're right. :wink02:

Let 'em loose, Bruce.

You have my approval; continue being awesome. :tt03:

tony hipchest
01-09-2011, 01:31 AM
Man. If anyone went into this season with more disgust (except for anyone that would call themselves "Fire Arians") for Arians's play calling, it was me.

Run, run, pass, punt.

:

this implies he would actually call a run play 66.33% of the time.

more like run, sack, pass, punt or

run, pass, sack, punt.

Diamond-D
01-09-2011, 01:49 AM
In fairness to my shoe, it probably would be a good replacement for Arians.

I mean, at the very least my shoe wouldn't tie itself up in knots. It would need someone else to do that for it. Arians on the other hand...

SteelKnight
01-09-2011, 01:58 AM
I hate BA's runs with second and long when they are no effective. We can be having a great drive then maybe there is an incomplete pass on 1st down. Now second down, do they really need Mwelde moore to run to fool people...drive killer. Now it is all or none on 3rd down.

Be conventional on second down and just require execution.

Great article. I wish I knew he read his letters.

SteelKnight
01-09-2011, 02:00 AM
WTF with the Redzone. They need to scrap their Red Zone playbook and start over next year. Look at the successful teams and copy...simple

saveus1011
01-09-2011, 02:36 AM
I still like my name of R2P2 for him.

Atlanta Dan
01-09-2011, 09:18 AM
You can overcome the quality of the coaching with the talent of the QB for a while but it catches up with you eventually (ask Peyton Manning how that works out with Jim Caldwell as your head coach)

Arians is Ben Roethlisberger's caddy and nothing more than that - unfortunately another trip to the playoffs means he comes back next year

If he is such a contributor to the success of the Steelers I wonder why the offensive coordinator for a team that has made the playoffs 3 out the last 4 years and won a Super Bowl has never received an interview for a HC vacancy - I doubt it is because Arians is demanding too much money

Whodis
01-09-2011, 09:23 AM
I hate seeing any phrase with the name "Arians" and the word "philosophy", it just doesn't sound right.

The bottom line is he sucks and will never have a another OC job in the NFL if he gets relieved of his current duties. They praise him because he has a good game against the Brown's? A tiger can't change his stripes. As I said before, unless we go to no-huddle, Arians will continue to out think himself.

mesaSteeler
01-09-2011, 10:12 AM
I completely agree with all of the above posters.

My beef with Tomlin is why does he tolerate the incompetence and ineptitude of the Airhead? Three years of the Airhead and we still can't score in the red zone! This is intolerable.

Airhead defenders love to point to the Super Bowl as an example of why the Airhead is worth keeping. Bull Crap I say! The Turdinals were an inferior opponent who just got hot and lucky in the playoffs.

The Super Bowl is why we need to get rid of the Airhead. That game was much closer than it needed to be. We left points on the field in the first half because we couldn't score from red zone and if we had any type of a running game we could have used it to chew clock and keep Warner off the field in the second half.

Instead of dominating the game it took improbable heroics by Ben and Santino against a weak Turdnail secondary to win. We were lucky.

Tomlin fired the O-Line and Special Teams coaches and look how much better those units are now.

Why Mike Why?

Why do you tolerate the incompetence of the Airhead?

How many more years will we not be able to score from the red zone?

btaylor179
01-09-2011, 10:16 AM
he sucks

wnyBob
01-09-2011, 10:43 AM
I’m not an OC nor are most people, but opinions are permitted and there are plenty enough Arians detractors that would indicate where there’s smoke there is fire, they all can’t be wrong. Not being an OC, diagramming plays won’t help, who listens. So take that some steps above a play calling technocrat to results oriented observations. Show me the money or the points. I’ve said, I’ll say and I’ll continue to say my observations are that certainly Arians can draw up a game plan and when it works it works. i.e. Cleveland. BUT when a DC gets his number and throws out defenses that he didn’t prepare for, he’s cooked. And he can not adjust mid-game. That’s the critical flaw in his tenure. Because of the D and Ben’s ability to ad-lib we’ve won games we could have lost, no thanks to Bruce, and we’ve lost some games we could have won but with a pitiful few points. 10 points in NO when even the announcers were commenting that NO threw out a D they didn’t normally use. 19 points at Buffalo, Ben’s good but his luck ran out when he was put into a position for last minute heroics with the 17 on the board against the Jets. I’m not in a position to get too carried away with Bruce’s run:pass ratio, but his run play selections and timing can drive you nuts sometimes. And IF you only look at Mendenhal’s total yards you’d say what’s to complain about, but if you look that Bruce beat Mendenhal’s head against a wall to get them without designing some better run schemes and chose to run the same plays over and over and over, you can scratch your head. Oh well, it is what it is. But now is not the time to wish failure on Arians, nows the time to hope he has an epiphany of offensive genius and everything is clicking like a well oiled machine. We can’t hope to have the D hand us three games in a row against playoff talent unless the O pulls some weight. Ben will do his part, as will everyone (everyone wants to win) but it would help if they got put into some positions to help themselves and down by 4 with 59 seconds to go isn’t one of them. lol

madtowndrunkard
01-09-2011, 12:53 PM
That points made in that article could be true if this were Arians first season OR if he didn't have enough talent to work with.

That article tries to dismiss the criticism by basically calling it the ramblings of fanatics. In many cases there is truth to that. In Most cases I think the criticism is fair.

I don't have an issue with Arians % of passes vs run. I do think that he frequently calls the wrong play. I do think he is not good at getting the offense prepared to run his game plans. I do think Arians is terrible at exploiting weaknesses.... or should I say he basically ignores the strengths and weaknesses of an opponent. To me that shows arrogance on Arians part.

When his offense consistently struggles to score points you have to at some point question the guy in charge. If it were not for Dick Lebeau's unit the shortcomings of our offense would be glaring and Arians would have been fired long ago. More often then not we win in spite of our offense. Sure at times the offense shines, but it is so inconsistent you have to question why. I think most fans see the talent on offense and week after week we struggle offensively. You have no choice but to point the finger at Arians.

Watch our offense run a screen play. Typically it looks sloppy and un rehearsed. When a professional offense can't run a screen play cleanly and sharp there is something wrong with the coaching.

SH-Rock
01-09-2011, 01:01 PM
I think when Lebau goes and the defense falters for a while and the offense can't score than Tomlin will open his eyes to the idiocy of Airhead Arians.

mesaSteeler
01-09-2011, 01:08 PM
I think when Lebau goes and the defense falters for a while and the offense can't score than Tomlin will open his eyes to the idiocy of Airhead Arians.

I hope it happens sooner than that.

toughsticks87
01-09-2011, 01:42 PM
I think there has been some improvement, but most of the frustration comes when I can predict the plays (and even the direction the run will go to) with about 75% accuracy. And I've never played football.

USWSteel
01-09-2011, 03:17 PM
I completely agree with all of the above posters.

My beef with Tomlin is why does he tolerate the incompetence and ineptitude of the Airhead? Three years of the Airhead and we still can't score in the red zone! This is intolerable.

Airhead defenders love to point to the Super Bowl as an example of why the Airhead is worth keeping. Bull Crap I say! The Turdinals were an inferior opponent who just got hot and lucky in the playoffs.

The Super Bowl is why we need to get rid of the Airhead. That game was much closer than it needed to be. We left points on the field in the first half because we couldn't score from red zone and if we had any type of a running game we could have used it to chew clock and keep Warner off the field in the second half.

Instead of dominating the game it took improbable heroics by Ben and Santino against a weak Turdnail secondary to win. We were lucky.

Tomlin fired the O-Line and Special Teams coaches and look how much better those units are now.

Why Mike Why?

Why do you tolerate the incompetence of the Airhead?

How many more years will we not be able to score from the red zone?


Because BA is Ben's boy. The story was that Ben loobied to keep BA in the offseason. They are golfing buddies.So blame Ben for Arians staying. People have such short memories. :tt:

MasterOfPuppets
01-09-2011, 08:19 PM
That points made in that article could be true if this were Arians first season OR if he didn't have enough talent to work with.

That article tries to dismiss the criticism by basically calling it the ramblings of fanatics. In many cases there is truth to that. In Most cases I think the criticism is fair.

I don't have an issue with Arians % of passes vs run. I do think that he frequently calls the wrong play. I do think he is not good at getting the offense prepared to run his game plans. I do think Arians is terrible at exploiting weaknesses.... or should I say he basically ignores the strengths and weaknesses of an opponent. To me that shows arrogance on Arians part.

When his offense consistently struggles to score points you have to at some point question the guy in charge. If it were not for Dick Lebeau's unit the shortcomings of our offense would be glaring and Arians would have been fired long ago. More often then not we win in spite of our offense. Sure at times the offense shines, but it is so inconsistent you have to question why. I think most fans see the talent on offense and week after week we struggle offensively. You have no choice but to point the finger at Arians.

Watch our offense run a screen play. Typically it looks sloppy and un rehearsed. When a professional offense can't run a screen play cleanly and sharp there is something wrong with the coaching.

:applaudit:
couldn't have said it better myself. my problem with bruce isn't his run / pass ratio , or even so much when he decides between the 2 .
my problem with the bozo is he sets up failure. sure the players have to execute , but removing the element of surprise doesn't help the execution. how many times have we seen ben in shotgun on 3rd and two or less ?
how many times has ben been sacked on 3rd and short when he had plenty of time in the pocket ? why is he looking 20 or 30 yds downfield on 3rd and 5 ? because thats where the freakin receivers are !!!

CaliStillersFan
01-09-2011, 08:25 PM
The Steelers can win the SB again this year, and I'll still want to see him fired. Sorry one good offensive game against the lowly Browns doesn't make me feel warm and fuzzy about his ability to call a game when it's close. I can only hope that we blow out every team, so BA can't screw us.

Steelboy84
01-09-2011, 08:28 PM
that's painfully obvious

Kanata-Steeler
01-09-2011, 08:54 PM
Philosophy ?! Ariens has a philosophy ?
I do to. Our Offense is a crash-test car, Ariens is the crash-test dummy trying to drive the car.
The only "philosophy" here, is that, there's a whole universe of infinite space between the steering wheel and the head-rest !