View Full Version : What Would the End of Football Look Like?

02-14-2012, 10:41 PM
What Would the End of Football Look Like?
An economic perspective on CTE and the concussion crisis
By Tyler Cowen and Kevin Grier on February 9, 2012

The NFL is done for the year, but it is not pure fantasy to suggest that it may be done for good in the not-too-distant future. How might such a doomsday scenario play out and what would be the economic and social consequences?

By now we're all familiar with the growing phenomenon of head injuries and cognitive problems among football players, even at the high school level. In 2009, Malcolm Gladwell asked whether football might someday come to an end, a concern seconded recently by Jonah Lehrer.

Before you say that football is far too big to ever disappear, consider the history: If you look at the stocks in the Fortune 500 from 1983, for example, 40 percent of those companies no longer exist. The original version of Napster no longer exists, largely because of lawsuits. No matter how well a business matches economic conditions at one point in time, it's not a lock to be a leader in the future, and that is true for the NFL too. Sports are not immune to these pressures. In the first half of the 20th century, the three big sports were baseball, boxing, and horse racing, and today only one of those is still a marquee attraction.

The most plausible route to the death of football starts with liability suits.1 Precollegiate football is already sustaining 90,000 or more concussions each year. If ex-players start winning judgments, insurance companies might cease to insure colleges and high schools against football-related lawsuits. Coaches, team physicians, and referees would become increasingly nervous about their financial exposure in our litigious society. If you are coaching a high school football team, or refereeing a game as a volunteer, it is sobering to think that you could be hit with a $2 million lawsuit at any point in time. A lot of people will see it as easier to just stay away. More and more modern parents will keep their kids out of playing football, and there tends to be a "contagion effect" with such decisions; once some parents have second thoughts, many others follow suit. We have seen such domino effects with the risks of smoking or driving without seatbelts, two unsafe practices that were common in the 1960s but are much rarer today. The end result is that the NFL's feeder system would dry up and advertisers and networks would shy away from associating with the league, owing to adverse publicity and some chance of being named as co-defendants in future lawsuits.

It may not matter that the losses from these lawsuits are much smaller than the total revenue from the sport as a whole. As our broader health care sector indicates (try buying private insurance when you have a history of cancer treatment), insurers don't like to go where they know they will take a beating. That means just about everyone could be exposed to fear of legal action.

This slow death march could easily take 10 to 15 years. Imagine the timeline. A couple more college players or worse, high schoolers commit suicide with autopsies showing CTE. A jury makes a huge award of $20 million to a family. A class-action suit shapes up with real legs, the NFL keeps changing its rules, but it turns out that less than concussion levels of constant head contact still produce CTE. Technological solutions (new helmets, pads) are tried and they fail to solve the problem. Soon high schools decide it isn't worth it. The Ivy League quits football, then California shuts down its participation, busting up the Pac-12. Then the Big Ten calls it quits, followed by the East Coast schools. Now it's mainly a regional sport in the southeast and Texas/Oklahoma. The socioeconomic picture of a football player becomes more homogeneous: poor, weak home life, poorly educated. Ford and Chevy pull their advertising, as does IBM and eventually the beer companies.

There's a lot less money in the sport, and at first it's "the next hockey" and then it's "the next rugby," and finally the franchises start to shutter.

Along the way, you would have an NFL with much lower talent levels, less training, and probably greater player representation from poorer countries, where the demand for money is higher and the demand for safety is lower. Finally, the NFL is marginalized as less-dangerous sports gobble up its market share. People American people might actually start calling "soccer" by the moniker of "football."

Despite its undeniable popularity and the sense that the game is everywhere the aggregate economic effect of losing the NFL would not actually be that large. League revenues are around $10 billion per year while U.S. GDP is around $15,300 billion. But that doesn't mean everyone would be fine.

Big stadiums will lose a lot of their value and that will drag down neighboring bars and restaurants, causing a lot of them to shut their doors. Cable TV will be less profitable, and this will hasten the movement of TV-watching, if we can still call it that, to the web. Super Bowl Sunday will no longer be the best time to go shopping for a new car at the dealership.

Take Green Bay as a case study: A 2009 study of the economic impact of the Packers' stadium estimated "$282 million in output, 2,560 jobs and $124.3 million in earnings, and $15.2 million in tax revenues." That's small potatoes for the national economy as a whole, but for a small and somewhat remote city of 104,000, it is a big deal indeed.2

Any location where football is the only game in town will suffer. If the Jets and Giants go, New York still has numerous other pro sports teams, Broadway, high-end shopping, skyscrapers, fine dining, and many other cultural activities. If college football dies, Norman, Oklahoma (current home to one of us), has noodling? And what about Clemson, in South Carolina, which relies on the periodic weekend football surge into town for its restaurant and retail sales? Imagine a small place of 12,000 people that periodically receives a sudden influx of 100,000 visitors or more, most of them eager to spend money on what is one of their major leisure outings. It's like a port in the Caribbean losing its cruise ship traffic. (Overall, the loss of football could actually increase migration from rural to urban areas over time. Football-dependent areas are especially prominent in rural America, and some of them will lose a lot of money and jobs.)

Outside of sports, American human capital and productivity probably rise. No football Saturdays on college campuses means less binge drinking, more studying, better grades, smarter future adults. Losing thousands of college players and hundreds of pro players might produce a few more doctors or engineers. Plus, talented coaches and general managers would gravitate toward management positions in American industry. Heck, just getting rid of fantasy football probably saves American companies hundreds of millions of dollars annually.

Other losers include anything that depends heavily on football to be financially viable, including the highly subsidized non-revenue collegiate sports. No more air travel for the field hockey teams or golf squads. Furthermore, many prominent universities would lose their main claim to fame. Alabama and LSU produce a large amount of revenue and notoriety from football without much in the way of first-rate academics to back it up. Schools would have to compete more on academics to be nationally prominent, which would again boost American education.

One of the biggest winners would be basketball. To the extent that fans replace football with another sport (instead of meth or oxy), high-octane basketball is the natural substitute. On the pro level, the season can stretch out leisurely, ticket prices rise, ratings rise, maybe the league expands (more great athletes in the pool now), and some of the centers and power forwards will have more bulk. At the college level, March Madness becomes the only game in town.

Another winner would be track and field. Future Rob Gronkowskis in the decathlon? Future Jerome Simpsons in the high jump? World records would fall at a rapid pace.

This outcome may sound ridiculous, but the collapse of football is more likely than you might think. If recent history has shown anything, it is that observers cannot easily imagine the big changes in advance. Very few people were predicting the collapse of the Soviet Union, the reunification of Germany, or the rise of China as an economic power. Once you start thinking through how the status quo might unravel, a sports universe without the NFL at its center no longer seems absurd.

So Tennis, anyone?

Tyler and Kevin are academic economists who think the dismal science can shed some light on the inner workings of the sports world. Follow them on Twitter: Tyler is @tylercowen, Kevin is @ez_angus.

02-15-2012, 08:35 AM
taking the "defense" out of the game almost makes it seem like the end of the sport is here now.

02-15-2012, 11:55 AM
... how-long is Ms. Goodell's current contract???

02-16-2012, 03:01 AM
If we can't insult each other over laundry we'll just go back to killing each other over skin color and religious differences.

If the NFL is destroyed, the people will become restless with no opposing team to direct and channel their God given tribal instincts at. With nothing else to do, the men of the nation will spend the next ten years joining various political parties, some nationalistic, some socialist, and they'll soon be battling it out in the streets. "Get the Red" will gradually take the place of Monday Night Football. Increased security and surveillance will be needed from a government that's already trillions of dollars in debt. The growing police state will be both rejected by the people and a unsustainable burden on our already fragile economy. To save themselves from an increasingly worthless dollar bill and increasingly violent political tensions, States begin seceding from the union. The U.S., now broke, fractured, and all but in a state of complete civil war, is unable to act as the Chinese and Russians seize the moment for opportune land grabs. Japan and Europe mobilize military forces while Israel launches nuclear weapons against Iran prompting an attack on Israel by its neighbors that results in the destruction of the entire region. World War III erupts with mushroom clouds.

The zombie apocalypse follows.

Please don't take my NFL....

02-16-2012, 03:16 AM
Someone has too much time on their hands.

02-18-2012, 01:46 PM
"...Tyler and Kevin are academic economists who think the dismal science... "

Uhhh, yep, and thats what hapened the last time i thought I was a wall street expert, :(
But, hey GL, and thanks for the geeks' anonymous football "reportoire" - (french for, dudes' you don't know what 'da F___ you are talkin' about !?)


silver & black
02-18-2012, 03:48 PM
It will look like Baseball will re-take the #1 passtime.:wink02:

I'm just about tired of the NFL as it is, now. I still love my Raiders.... and I'll watch, but "NFL football" is already dead.

02-18-2012, 04:24 PM
basketball could never replace football for me, I just can't stand the squeaky shoes. I can't take it!

02-18-2012, 06:46 PM
... but "NFL football" is already dead.


learn-it, live-it, love-it

Atlanta Dan
02-26-2012, 08:52 AM
Precollegiate football is already sustaining 90,000 or more concussions each year. If ex-players start winning judgments, insurance companies might cease to insure colleges and high schools against football-related lawsuits. Coaches, team physicians, and referees would become increasingly nervous about their financial exposure in our litigious society. If you are coaching a high school football team, or refereeing a game as a volunteer, it is sobering to think that you could be hit with a $2 million lawsuit at any point in time. A lot of people will see it as easier to just stay away. More and more modern parents will keep their kids out of playing football, and there tends to be a "contagion effect" with such decisions; once some parents have second thoughts, many others follow suit.

This story in today's Post-Gazette on the alleged "old school" attitude to injuries by the current HC at Peters Township and the concerns that attitude has prompted is an indication of how the scenario described in the article could play out

Some in Peters divided on issues involving coach

Since last month, Peters Township High School's varsity football coach has been the subject of publicized allegations that he downplayed the gravity of concussions, clashed with athletic trainers, belittled staff and insulted players.

Two official inquiries found no wrongdoing by Richard L. Piccinini.

But since then, more detailed allegations have emerged. While not common, the type of thorny issues raised by Mr. Piccinini's critics occasionally appear in high school athletic programs.

"It's rare, but it's not unheard of," said Robert Ferraro, founder and CEO of the Pennsylvania-based National High School Coaches Association.

Among the questions raised by the Peters controversy are: How should coaches approach concussions, a critical topic in sports today? How should school districts handle allegations of coaches crossing the line from being demanding to jeopardizing athletes' health? And what kind of role model should a coach be?...

Two of Mr. Mortland's trainers, Andrew Traber and Kim Windstein, said they felt Mr. Piccinini undermined their assessments of injured players. They said they believe he created an atmosphere in which players were subtly dissuaded from seeking medical help....In August, the trainers said, two players suffered concussions. Both returned to the sidelines to watch the team while wearing sunglasses and hats to protect them from sunlight, which can aggravate concussion symptoms.

Mr. Traber, 26, of Bridgeville, said Mr. Piccinini told the players "not to wear sunglasses on his field."

"He kept saying ... that, 'He doesn't have a concussion. He needs to get back on the field.' He kept pressuring us to push up the date of his appointment with UPMC to be ready for the initial scrimmage," Mr. Traber said.

Matt Bianco, father of one player, said he became concerned when other parents told him their children were not reporting injuries because they were being "belittled" by the coach.

Mr. Bianco said his son told him he did not remove his hat or sunglasses that day, but he later developed an arm hematoma and went to the hospital because he had left it untreated.

The teen was afraid to report the injury for fear of Mr. Piccinini's reaction, Mr. Bianco said....

The phrases "It's not a concussion, it's just a headache" and "tape it up" became two familiar statements by Mr. Piccinini, trainers said....

"There's no way he will step on the field if he's the coach," Mr. Bianco said.


The P-G article states these are allegations rather than undipsuted facts, but it does indicate parents (and trainers) are more aware of the dangers of brain injuries associated with football and accordingly are no longer deferring to the decision of the coach. At some point prohibiting sons from playing football since it is not worth the risk is the next step.

02-27-2012, 01:24 PM
usually i brush this kind of stuff off, but there's some REAL scary stuff here. If one thing could ultimately kill the league...this could be it....this potentially could be, and likely will, be far more damaging than the things people complain about that Roger Goodell is doing to the league.

Now its starting to seem as if everyone who got a "head" injury (whom knowingly and willingly chose to play a dangerous, contact sport) is coming out of the woodwork. Attorney's are now slobbering all over the place to file suits on behalf of this player, that player, and on, and on, and on.
This will only pick up steam. Current players like Colt McCoy who was concussed this year and likely doesn't have a great chance at a long and illustrious career anyway? Oh, yeah....when he's finished, look for him to file suit too along with dozens of others.
This is potentially devastating stuff. Is the "flag" QB's or "everyone's" for that matter closer in our future than we even joke about?? Quite possibly. I'm SURE....that in our lifetime....at minimum we will see QB's with a flag. Don't laugh. It will happen.

I do have a problem with a large portion of this as they knowingly played the sport. They could have easily took their degree and went into the business path. Its like smoking...people know its bad for them and going to hurt their bodies...but they do it anyway....then afterwards when they get cancer or something...they want to sue the tobacco companies.

02-27-2012, 06:39 PM
I entertain a private suspicion that physical sports were much more really effective and beneficent when they were not taken quite so seriously. One of the first essentials of sport being healthy is that it should be delightful; it is rapidly becoming a false religion with austerities and prostrations. - G.K. Chesterton

As much as I love sports, he's right on the money. I invest too much time into sports that it pretty much has become a religion. Remove Football, then there will always be something else that we will worship.

02-27-2012, 07:19 PM
Arena football is rougher than NFL nowadays