Steelers Fever Forums

Steelers Fever Forums (
-   Locker Room (
-   -   Comcast buys Time Warner Cable for $45 billion (

MasterOfPuppets 02-14-2014 01:39 AM

Comcast buys Time Warner Cable for $45 billion
hmmm...there goes the competition ...wonder if the cable bill will go up..:shake01:..well mine won't because i have atlanticbb and the next time my bill goes up i'm gonna tell they can stuff their cable up their asses.

JonM229 02-14-2014 07:48 AM

Re: Comcast buys Time Warner Cable for $45 billion

NSMaster56 02-14-2014 10:58 AM

Re: Comcast buys Time Warner Cable for $45 billion
Is the deal official?

About three years ago A T & T tried to buy out T-Mobile, but the move was blocked by the courts (and because Verizon probably paid them off).

Vis 02-14-2014 11:00 AM

Re: Comcast buys Time Warner Cable for $45 billion
It's pending approval

Atlanta Dan 02-14-2014 11:10 AM

Re: Comcast buys Time Warner Cable for $45 billion
What could go wrong - the best telecommunications systems in the world will only get bester

Analysis of how the crap sandwich served to U.S. telecom customers will only get tastier here

The Real Problem with the Comcast Merger

Among household expenses, few things have risen quite as quickly as the cable bill. As recently as the nineteen-nineties, cable prices ranged from seven dollars to eleven dollars and fifty cents per month. After years of price hikes, a decent cable package is now over sixty dollars a month; the average cost is eighty-six dollars. Comcast, in 2013, collected about a hundred and fifty-six dollars a month on average, per customer—and some people are paying much more than that....

Comcast, in announcing its deal, has said nothing about how it might save consumers money. Instead, it calls the deal “an exciting opportunity” for its customers, promising “accelerated deployment of existing and new innovative products and services.” I suspect that I’m not alone in thinking that a lack of excitement isn’t what most customers call to complain about. Everyone, even people in the industry, knows that the prices are too damn high. But tellingly, nowhere in any of its materials does Comcast suggest a plan to do anything about it. So just what makes this merger in the public’s interest? ...

With a larger customer base and more buying power, Comcast would be left with several time-tested techniques for reducing competition and increasing prices. For Comcast, that’s the exciting part. ...

The crazy part is that this deal would actually put Comcast in a position to lower prices, if it wanted to. It could use efficiencies of scale to cut the price and increase the speed of broadband. It could use its buying power to negotiate better deals with ESPN, Viacom, and other programmers, passing on the savings to customers. That’s what the company would do in a parallel universe where it faced actual competition. But passing on savings has never been part of Comcast’s business model, and, absent a corporate lobotomy, it may never be.

And here

We Need Real Competition, Not a Cable-Internet Monopoly

As residents of the country that came up with Hollywood, Silicon Valley, and the Internet, we like to think that we lead the world in communications and entertainment. And we’re certainly ahead in one way: we pay far more for broadband Internet access, cable television, and home phone lines than people in many other advanced countries, even though the services we get aren’t any better. All too often, they are worse.

Take the “triple-play” packages—cable, phone, and high-speed Internet access—that tens of millions of Americans buy from companies like Comcast and Time Warner Cable. In France, a country often portrayed as an economic and technological laggard, the monthly cost of these packages is roughly forty dollars a month—about a quarter of what we Americans pay. And, unlike in the United States, France’s triple-play packages include free telephone calls to anywhere in the world. Moreover, the French get faster Internet service: ten times faster for downloading information, and twenty times faster for uploading it....

In Seoul, triple-play packages start at about fifteen dollars a month—yes, fifteen. In Zurich, otherwise a pretty expensive place to live, they start at thirty dollars. When it comes to stand-alone services, it’s a similar story. In Britain, for example, monthly cell-phone charges start at about fifteen dollars; unlimited broadband starts at about twenty-five dollars a month. And, if you buy a television that was built since 2008, you get access to Freeview, a digital television service that provides more than sixty television channels, about thirty radio channels, and about a dozen streaming Internet channels, all at no cost.

Why are things so different, and so expensive, in the United States? There are various answers, but by far the most important ones are competition and competition policy.

But Comcast has paid good $$$ for influence in Washington and now it is time to call in the IOUs to get this merger approved:thumbsup:

Time Warner Cable Deal to Test Comcast CEO's Washington Clout

Comcast Chief Executive Brian Roberts has spent the past five years making friends with the Obama administration, but he faces a host of unknowns on the regulatory front. The government review is likely to be lengthy and could touch on everything from cable prices to the way web traffic is prioritized.

The expected marathon regulatory scrutiny may become a measure of the company's clout in the capital, and in particular that of its senior executives. Mr. Roberts sits on a presidential jobs council, has hosted President Barack Obama and top presidential adviser Valerie Jarrett at his Martha's Vineyard home and has also golfed with the president.

Comcast executives have been generous donors to the Democratic Party and enjoy regular access to senior administration officials. Mr. Roberts and his wife, Aileen, have donated $417,290 to Democrats over the past 25 years, compared with $116,150 for Republicans, according to the Center for Responsive Politics Open Secrets website.

The company employs a host of former FCC officials in its lobbying office and is one of the most visible players in Washington. It spent $18 million on lobbying in 2013, making it the seventh-highest spender overall, according to Open Secrets.

It regularly hosts events for members of Congress, their staffs and other policy types in the capital.

Comcast employees made a total of $6.5 million in campaign contributions during the 2012 election cycle, including $466,000 to the Democratic National Committee and $305,000 to the president's campaign for re-election....

Comcast Executive Vice President David Cohen is a major bundler of contributions for the Democrats, and has hosted a number of prominent fundraisers featuring the president at his home and other venues. Of the almost $870,000 Mr. Cohen and his wife, Rhonda, have donated to campaigns, 79% has gone to Democrats, while just 9% has gone to Republicans.

Mr. Cohen and his wife attended Tuesday night's White House state dinner in honor of French President François Hollande.

A Comcast spokeswoman said the company doesn't comment on donations by its employees.

Comcast's lobbying and regulatory team includes Meredith Attwell Baker, a former Republican FCC commissioner who voted in favor of the Comcast-NBC Universal acquisition four months before she joined Comcast.

Atlanta Dan 02-14-2014 11:10 AM

Re: Comcast buys Time Warner Cable for $45 billion
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Comcast plans to buy Time Warner Cable. They tried to do it 6 months ago but they've been on hold for a representative</p>&mdash; Eliza Bayne (@ElizaBayne) <a href="">February 13, 2014</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//" charset="utf-8"></script>

SteelCityMom 02-14-2014 11:20 AM

Re: Comcast buys Time Warner Cable for $45 billion

MasterOfPuppets 02-14-2014 02:56 PM

Re: Comcast buys Time Warner Cable for $45 billion

MACH1 02-14-2014 08:42 PM

Re: Comcast buys Time Warner Cable for $45 billion

Alarming Charts Show Just How Much Power Comcast Will Have Over Cable Industry If Time Warner Deal Stands

Worries continue to swirl around Comcast’s recent $45 billion buyout of Time Warner Cable, a deal that combines the two biggest U.S. cable providers.

The concerns are not unjustified. If the merger is approved, Comcast would control more than half of American cable subscribers. Critics argue that the mega-merger represents a “quasi-monopoly” and customers will ultimately pay for it as lack of competition could lead to higher prices.

Using data from the National Cable and Telecommunications Association, these graphs provide and illustration of how the cable industry will change if the merger is successful:


This domination of the market is problematic for a number of other reasons too, including the potential for a lack of diversity of voices. TheBlaze network’s CEO Chris Balfe was quoted in Variety as saying:

Major MVPDs do not have a good history of supporting independent programmers whose content is in demand like TheBlaze and we are skeptical that giving Comcast even more market power will benefit consumers, promote competition or lead to more diversity of voices or consumer choice on their channel line ups.”

Balfe isn’t alone either. The left-leaning news website the Huffington Post has been blasting the deal as a “disaster” for American customers since the news first broke earlier this week.

MasterOfPuppets 02-14-2014 08:57 PM

Re: Comcast buys Time Warner Cable for $45 billion
NO reason to panic. if everybody starts canceling their subscription , they'll get the message and back off. :noidea:

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:45 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Shoutbox provided by vBShout v6.2.1 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.0.8 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd. Runs best on HiVelocity Hosting.
Navbar with Avatar by Motorradforum