Steelers Fever Forums - Make the Wealthy Tax Exempt

Steelers Fever Forums (http://forums.steelersfever.com/index.php)

- Locker Room (http://forums.steelersfever.com/forumdisplay.php?f=8)

- - Make the Wealthy Tax Exempt (http://forums.steelersfever.com/showthread.php?t=35962)

Make the Wealthy Tax Exempt

Now, before you guys get all up in arms about the topic title, let me explain. This piece is a theory. Today in my Social Studies class we were given the responsibility of fixing the recession. I'm going to major in Education: History/Social Studies next fall so this kind of thing is very important to me. I gave this a lot of thought and I believe I have come up with a tedious but plausible solution to our economic struggles. Give it a chance and tell me what you think. I'd like to hear some of your opinions! (Please, constructive criticism only. I'm only a student so don't unleash your political wrath on me if you don't like the idea. I've seen it and it is scary! :flap:)

Quote:

Tyler Dunn

Welcome to taxing and spending.

Americans do not have quite the best attitude toward taxes – “Take from the rich and give to the poor!” some say. But that is not the answer. In fact, it is entirely the opposite.

We are getting ahead of ourselves though. First, the basics.

If you want the government to provide high quality public services, you have to cough up the dough. Operating the US government is very expensive, and almost all of it must be paid for by taxes. That is simple enough. Now we’re going to get just a little more complicated. There is the problem, in any form of governing a nation, of unintended consequences. In other words, when the government takes any form of action, that action creates an entire slew of reactions. Often times unintended reactions. High tax rates tend to slow economic growth. Every dollar that goes to the government in taxes is a dollar that cannot be used to stimulate the economy. For example, imagine that I am a very wealthy man. I have to fork over close to 70% of my income to the government.

That is a lot of money. My money that I earned. So it’s a pretty painful experience already, even in good economic times. But few would take pity on me. "Take from the rich and give to the poor!" However, those cheers would fall quiet if all could see where that money would have gone had it not gone to the government. I would have invested it in the stock market. There, it would grow businesses, several of which were hoping to expand. That expansion would have meant new jobs - maybe even jobs for some of those in the cheering crowd.

To further understand what we’re talking about here, let's take a closer look at what happens when taxes are raised. If the government decides to raise taxes by 5%, that means that all taxpayers will have that much less money to spend. They will need to cut back on luxury items such as electronic goods and going out to dinner. That means that businesses which provide those kinds of goods and services will see a drop in sales. The drop in sales will force them to cancel plans for expansion, cut back orders, lay off workers, etc... These decisions will hurt other areas of the economy as well. If Walmart orders fewer tractors, for example, that means that fewer tractors need to be transported from location to location, which means a loss of business for trucking companies. You can see how a slow down of the economy in one area hurts another. That, in turn, affects another area, and so on and so on. If the trend continues, the entire economy will slow down. When that happens it is called a "recession". People lose their jobs, businesses close and the public gets very angry at the politicians.

So what is the answer to stopping recession? Temporarily make wealthy Americans tax exempt.

That is not to say you let them do what they want with their money, oh no – where would be the good in that? Many of the non-conscious citizens would simply and selfishly stow away their cash knowing that we’re in such troubling financial times.

No, what would be done is something entirely different. It is not a ‘stimulus’ plan by the government per say – more of an ‘encouragement’. An almost laissez-faire like proposal.

That 70% I paid in taxes would be cut down to 60%. And that 60% would no longer be tax money, it would become “National Investment Funds”. I would be required, by law, to invest that 60% into the stock market. The other 10% would be cut to encourage me to spend money more extravagantly – another way to push economic growth. Although the second would be impossible to enforce, what would you do if your funds happened to rise by 10%? I think it is safe to say some extra spending would occur.

There are a couple of setbacks.

First, as mentioned before, the government needs tax money to operate. This obstacle would have to be worked out by someone with a more expansive knowledge of United States spending than I personally have. If suggesting though, deficit spending might not be a bad idea in this case. Say the program ran for a few years, until the economy was once again steady (Possibly better than ever). That would be the time to pay back all debt. Second, what is the government to do once the program ends? It would cause an economic catastrophe to just start taxing the wealthy again cold turkey. The answer, though, is a simple one. You would ease the tax money back into the government by taking small steps. This would allow the stock market and monetary world as an entirety to slowly correct itself over a short period of the few years it would take to get back up to that 70%.

Overall it is a plan that would require a lot of work, intelligence and commitment. That being said, any plan that gets the economy out of its current hole is going to have to be filled with those traits. This plan, though, is a simple one that would produce quick results.

As crazy as it sounds - the answer to our economic troubles might just be to turn the wealthy into tax exempt US citizens.

Feedback?