Steelers Fever Forums

Steelers Fever Forums (http://forums.steelersfever.com/index.php)
-   Locker Room (http://forums.steelersfever.com/forumdisplay.php?f=8)
-   -   Hours after election, White House supports U.N.ís global ban on Guns (http://forums.steelersfever.com/showthread.php?t=93512)

Fire Haley 11-12-2012 03:48 PM

Hours after election, White House supports U.N.ís global ban on Guns
 
Following Obama Victory, U.S. Backs New U.N. Arms Treaty Talks

Just a few hours after being re-elected, President Obama encouraged the United States to support new United Nations discussions on a global treaty regulating guns and the gun industry. Supporters of the treaty believe the talks collapsed in July due to the campaign and Obamaís fears that Romney could use it against him.

Now that the President has four more years in office, the White House is ready for the discussions to begin again.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/foll...-treaty-talks/

----------------------

If Obama had his way....



SAS sniper jailed for 18 months for 'forgetting' about pistol(UK)

Sergeant Danny Nightingale, who served in Iraq and Afghanistan, was sentenced to 18 months in a military jail last week.

A working 9mm Glock handgun, given to him after he trained a counterterrorism force in 2007, was found in his home by police last year.

He said he forgot he had the weapon and failed to declare it. His wife Sally described the father of two as a 'hero who has been betrayed', while the sentence came in for more criticism after it was handed down in the days leading up to Remembrance Sunday.

Sgt Nightingale's lawyer said his client had planned to deny illegal possession of a firearm but changed his plea to guilty when warned he could face a five-year sentence if convicted.

http://www.metro.co.uk/news/917609-s...g-about-pistol


----------------------


citizens respond...



US guns sales soar after Barack Obama's re-election

Owners of guns have been stocking up because they are concerned about a potential tightening of regulations on assault weapons in the president's second term.

In October the number of background checks on people applying to buy guns, an indicator of future sales, increased by 18.4 per cent.

There was a similar jump when President Obama was first elected in 2008. A total of 12.7 million background checks were carried out that year, up from 11.2 million the year before, and the number has been rising since then.


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worl...-election.html

MACH1 11-12-2012 04:33 PM

Re: Hours after election, White House supports U.N.ís global ban on Guns
 
Quote:

That didn’t take long. Less than a day after President Obama’s re-election, the administration breathed new life into the United Nations‘ previously comatose treaty regulating guns.

Last July, the U.N. General Assembly began formal discussion of the Arms Trade Treaty, which seeks to establish “common international standards for the import, export and transfer of conventional arms.” Talks on the controversial agreement were put on indefinite hiatus after the United States requested an extension to the time allotted to negotiate the agreement. Gun rights supporters blasted the treaty as it inched toward approval, and many suspected U.S. procedural maneuvers were intended to delay the treaty so it wouldn’t become a topic of discussion during the election. It appears these suspicions were correct since “indefinite” turned out to mean until hours after Mr. Obama was re-elected.

The administration line is that the treaty applies only to firearms exports and poses no threat to domestic gun owners. “We seek a treaty that contributes to international security by fighting illicit arms trafficking and proliferation, protects the sovereign right of states to conduct legitimate arms trade, and meets the concerns that we have been articulating throughout,” an administration official said. “We will not accept any treaty that infringes on the constitutional rights of our citizens to bear arms.”

It is hard to take the White House response seriously. The treaty instructs countries to “take the necessary legislative and administrative measures, to adapt, as necessary, national laws and regulations to implement the obligations of this treaty.” The agreement’s language is so broad, vague and poorly defined it could be stretched in a variety of ways that would pose a threat to the Second Amendment. Treaty backers also want to insert provisions forcing ratifying states to promote a variety of fashionable left-wing causes including “sustainable development,” even though they have nothing to do with the arms trade.

Though the treaty is supposed to be about “gun exports,” its provisions can still be applied domestically. Activist judges adjudicating cases arising under the treaty and enabling legislation could see to that. The definition of international commerce could follow the same expansive logic liberal courts have used to redefine “interstate commerce.” Anything that indirectly or incidentally affects the trade in arms would fall under its control.

A ratified treaty, with constitutional authority, could be interpreted in a way that applies to any imported weapon or round of ammunition, those made with foreign components, those containing imported materials, those that might some day be exported, and those capable of being exported. If it affects the overall arms market, it could be said to be part of “international” trade, even if the item never leaves our shores. In practice this logic would give the government free rein to regulate all weapons, foreign and domestic. With the election out of the way, the White House can move swiftly to get the treaty through the U.N. General Assembly and up to the Senate by the summer of 2013. Elections have consequences.

The Washington Times

Read more: EDITORIAL: Gun ban back on Obama's agenda - Washington Times http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...#ixzz2C38Exk1D
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter
So much for being a sovereign nation.

Bayz101 11-12-2012 04:40 PM

Re: Hours after election, White House supports U.N.ís global ban on Guns
 
Try and take my guns, and i'll USE my guns.

Vis 11-12-2012 04:54 PM

Re: Hours after election, White House supports U.N.ís global ban on Guns
 
It doesn't do what we fear but activist judges with no authority over an international treaty could apply it to citizens without a legal basis.

Fear fear fear. We know you are dumb enough to buy this shit so we keep shoveling.

- The rightwing media entertainment complex.

MACH1 11-12-2012 05:00 PM

Re: Hours after election, White House supports U.N.ís global ban on Guns
 
http://www.politifake.org/image/poli...1283367377.jpg

Fire Haley 11-12-2012 05:10 PM

Re: Hours after election, White House supports U.N.ís global ban on Guns
 
"A working 9mm Glock handgun!!!!!"

Gasp! Only killers have these assault weapons!!!! > left wing gun grabbers

Atlanta Dan 11-12-2012 06:26 PM

Re: Hours after election, White House supports U.N.ís global ban on Guns
 
We are fortunate that patriots in Lubbock County, Texas foresaw months ago the likelihood of a UN takeover after Obama was re-elected and stand ready to protect our sovereignty:thumbsup:

Judge Tom Head and Commissioner Mark Heinrich told the station this week that a 1.7 cent tax increase for the next fiscal year was necessary to prepare for many contingencies, including Obama's re-election. He also mentioned to the station that the county needs a pay increase is needed for the district attorney's office and more funds to pay for more sheriff's office deputies.

"He's going to try to hand over the sovereignty of the United States to the (United Nations), and what is going to happen when that happens?," Head asked the station during a Monday interview. "I'm thinking the worst. Civil unrest, civil disobedience, civil war maybe. And we're not just talking a few riots here and demonstrations, we're talking Lexington, Concord, take up arms and get rid of the guy."

Head also seems to fear the retaliation of such civil unrest.

"Now what's going to happen if we do that, if the public decides to do that? He's going to send in U.N. troops. I don't want 'em in Lubbock County. OK. So I'm going to stand in front of their armored personnel carrier and say 'you're not coming in here'.

"And the sheriff, I've already asked him, I said 'you gonna back me' he said, 'yeah, I'll back you'. Well, I don't want a bunch of rookies back there. I want trained, equipped, seasoned veteran officers to back me."


http://www.chron.com/news/houston-te...ar-3807672.php


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:23 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Shoutbox provided by vBShout v6.2.1 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.0.8 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd. Runs best on HiVelocity Hosting.
Navbar with Avatar by Motorradforum