Steelers Fever Forums

Steelers Fever Forums (http://forums.steelersfever.com/index.php)
-   ** The War Room 2013 ** (http://forums.steelersfever.com/forumdisplay.php?f=47)
-   -   Do We Take Barkley if He's Available? (http://forums.steelersfever.com/showthread.php?t=96303)

SteelersCanada 02-01-2013 01:31 PM

Do We Take Barkley if He's Available?
 
I'll keep it short and to the point - say we're drafting in the second round this year and, for whatever reason, Matt Barkley is sitting on the board. Say he has a bad combine and less than impressive pro-day to help this situation along. Since we have an obvious and glaring need for not only a back up to Roethlisberger but a potential replacement, would we spend a second round pick on this kid? His stock went into a complete tailspin and sitting out the final game and the Bowl Game certainly didn't help it back up.

This is the only scenario in which we take a Quarterback in my opinion. I know he's from USC and their last few Quarterbacks have been less than impressive to say the least, but I'd be willing to take that risk for Barkley. I think sitting behind Ben for a few years would ultimately help his progress and make him a potential replacement candidate for Roethlisberger.

So, if he's on the board in the second round when we're picking, do we take him?

MasterOfPuppets 02-01-2013 04:04 PM

Re: Do We Take Barkley if He's Available?
 
oh hell no

Justp94 02-01-2013 04:57 PM

Re: Do We Take Barkley if He's Available?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets (Post 1081944)
oh hell no

FACT!

Steel Glory 02-01-2013 05:15 PM

Re: Do We Take Barkley if He's Available?
 
I would rather have mark sanchez than matt barkley. Seriously... that's how much I don't like him

SteelersCanada 02-01-2013 07:19 PM

Re: Do We Take Barkley if He's Available?
 
He has flaws in his mechanics, sure, but those are teachable flaws. He's not as bad as what people are making him out to be, honestly.

cbrunn 02-01-2013 07:24 PM

Re: Do We Take Barkley if He's Available?
 
No Thanks...

Bring back Denis Dixon , Josh Johnson ...

I would like to sign Pat White ... I read he was trying to make a come back , that kid was a baller

teegre 02-02-2013 01:40 AM

Re: Do We Take Barkley if He's Available?
 
SteelCanada,
As we have discussed, this is not the year to take a QB.

BUT, I hear what you are saying.

In fact, I was discussing something similar, in another thread. If one of these "average" QBs is still there at 47, then it would be an interesting dilemma. Now, personally, I am more for waiting for a better draft class, but if Barkley or Wilson or Nassib is there... it would make one think for a second.

That said, obviously, none of those guys is a R1 QB (although, due to need, there will be a few who go R1)... and, NONE of them would have been drafted in R2 in last year's draft (although, last year's draft class was an anomaly: five HOF caliber QBs). So, actually, R2 is "about right" for these QBs.

Now... would i take one? Eh... I am leaning towards Alex Carder (in R6). He is just about as good (not much drop off from the #2 rated QB and the #10 rated QB)... and, most importantly, it addresses a need, without having to use a premium draft pick. Then, next year, draft a QB early.

Regarding Barkley:
He is good at throwing receivers open (a difficult trait to teach)... but, his arm is garbage. I live in SoCal, & watch a lot of games with SoCal fans... and these Homers do not even like him. They compare him to Philip Rivers: limited.

teegre 02-02-2013 01:41 AM

Re: Do We Take Barkley if He's Available?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cbrunn (Post 1081964)
No Thanks...

Bring back Denis Dixon , Josh Johnson ...

I would like to sign Pat White ... I read he was trying to make a come back , that kid was a baller

I... love... Pat... White.

Although, I do not see him as a starting QB (to small). BUT, he is a winner (the only QB in NCAA history to win four bowl games as a starter).

kan_t 02-02-2013 03:03 AM

Re: Do We Take Barkley if He's Available?
 
No. This year the QB class is just bad. Not a year to pick a QB early.

Steeldude 02-02-2013 06:38 AM

Re: Do We Take Barkley if He's Available?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by SteelersCanada (Post 1081933)
I'll keep it short and to the point - say we're drafting in the second round this year and, for whatever reason, Matt Barkley is sitting on the board. Say he has a bad combine and less than impressive pro-day to help this situation along. Since we have an obvious and glaring need for not only a back up to Roethlisberger but a potential replacement, would we spend a second round pick on this kid? His stock went into a complete tailspin and sitting out the final game and the Bowl Game certainly didn't help it back up.

This is the only scenario in which we take a Quarterback in my opinion. I know he's from USC and their last few Quarterbacks have been less than impressive to say the least, but I'd be willing to take that risk for Barkley. I think sitting behind Ben for a few years would ultimately help his progress and make him a potential replacement candidate for Roethlisberger.

So, if he's on the board in the second round when we're picking, do we take him?

Why? He isn't a good enough QB to waste a 2nd round pick on. Also, the Steelers don't need a QB in the early rounds.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:36 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Shoutbox provided by vBShout v6.2.1 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.0.8 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd. Runs best on HiVelocity Hosting.
Navbar with Avatar by Motorradforum