Originally Posted by Vis
I do accuse them of pushing bad research. They have admitted it was wrong. All legitimate science disagrees with it. No one is defending those findings not even the man who ran the committee. I didn't have to come down on 1 of 2 sides here, there's only 1 side. I did throw in colorful language to lighten the mood.
There is only "one side" to your contention that the NFL is using the CBA preemption argument to "conceal fraudulent behavior."?
If you want to contend the plaintiffs should prevail go for it but any contention that you have not picked a side and decided who should prevail in this litigation is nonsense