View Single Post
Old 07-23-2012, 04:09 PM   #17
tanda10506
Team President
 
tanda10506's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Smoky Mountains, TN
Posts: 2,104
Gender: Male
Member Number: 17319
Thanks: 814
Thanked 367 Times in 206 Posts
Default Re: Steelers, Mike Wallace continue to make progress on new deal

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dodens Grav View Post
I don't understand why the article would have made you less confident in a deal.

Mike Wallace is not better than Vincent Jackson. I don't believe he will be getting a contract quite as large as that.
I don't believe he will be getting a contract quite as large either, I think that's what he will want. Jackson has been playing longer then Wallace and has 3 years where he was the #1 WR and started all season, where Wallace only has 2, so that works against him. But if you look at their stats in the past 2 productive years I believe he is better.

Wallace (2010&2011): 132rec, 2450 yards, 18.8 avg., 18 TD's including a 95 yarder
Jackson (2009&2011-injured most of 2010): 128 rec, 2273 yards, 17.8 avg., 18 TD's

So Wallace's numbers are slightly better, but when you factor in age and Wallace's incredible speed, I think it's a valid argument.
__________________
tanda10506 is offline   Reply With Quote