Originally Posted by Vincent
What about "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed
." is ambiguous? "Infringe" means "to encroach upon in a way that violates law or the rights of another
. In other words, any and every law that restricts full access to weapons of any kind is unconstitutional. Registration, limitations, restrictions of any kind are verboten under this, our most important amendment. It protects the rest of the amendments.
I'm always very suspicious of these isolated crazy incidents because of who stands to gain from them.
No one gains from this. Many people lost everything. But are you suggesting that the star chamber that masterminded the 9/11 fraud did this as well?
Hey, aren't you willing to attack Iran to stop them from getting nukes? On the otherhand you are in favor of any American citizen being allowed to have one under your interpretation of the 2nd Amendment, even Muslim American citizens. That is your position?