View Single Post
Old 10-01-2012, 12:00 AM   #8
Bench Warmer

Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 323
Member Number: 24397
Thanks: 246
Thanked 231 Times in 120 Posts
My Mood: Psychedelic
Default Re: Personnel for a 4-3?

Originally Posted by tony hipchest View Post
can someopne please explain some peoples affinity for the 4-3 defense?

the colts defense is switching to a 3-4 defense this year.

you mean they had it right all those years when they went to the superbowl and lost another and STILL got their asses kicked by the patriots on a regular basis?

i laugh at all the steelerfans that quote brady having the 3-4 figured out as a legitimate reason to switch.

Brady does have it figured out, dink-n-dunk to the endzone. That is no reason to switch to a 4-3, but I do think it's a good reason to have the personnel to play man-man.

I personally want to keep it as a 3-4, but our talent is currently not suited for it, and the young guys we do have are better suited for a 4-3 scheme.

Do you think it would be accurate to say that Hood, Heyward and Timmons would be better a better fit for a 4-3?

They are the youth in the front 7, hopefully they can be coached up to fit our scheme better soon.

Now a question for you Tony.
Is there any difference between the Cardinals scheme and ours? Basically as stated in the op.
JVip is offline   Reply With Quote