View Single Post
Old 12-12-2012, 11:05 PM   #28
teegre
Living Legend
Supporter
 
teegre's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 13,425
Member Number: 24108
Thanks: 17,724
Thanked 18,786 Times in 7,928 Posts
My Mood: Dead
Default Re: Would You Trade Wallace for Flowers?

Quote:
Originally Posted by SteelersCanada View Post
I think I worded this poorly. I'll try to explain it a little bit clearer:

Mike Wallace gets resigned by the Steelers for the sole purpose of being traded to the Chiefs. The Chiefs have to o.k the deal, and would in return, send Brandon Flowers our way. I'm not suggesting that Mike gets resigned and then we just stumble on a possible trade partner, but we'd work with the Chiefs on negotiating a contract they deemed fair and wouldn't mind taking on.

I'm not asking to bring him back, quite the opposite. If this is a possibility - which, I honestly think it is - we'd have the best secondary in football. Period. If we draft well, too, we could possibly be looking at a defense very similar to the '05 Steelers - dominate in all facets of the game.
I got what you meant.

I was just pointing out that achieving a trade is difficult enough... adding the extra burden of trading a player who has to "agree to a franchise tag/agree to a new contract" before he can be traded is doubly as difficult.

That said, if Faulk can rush for 1,000 & receive 1,000 and still be traded, then ANYTHING can be done.

Again, I like the idea.

Disgruntled for disgruntled = win-win.
teegre is offline   Reply With Quote