Originally Posted by WokeUpWithaWoodley
You woulnd want the bears d?! They produced the most points and that would of at least won us a few more games.
You cant always say we had the number defense to make a argument because it is very misleading our d did not look like the number 1 d at all this year.
Do you want to have a worse defense for 2 years while the Steelers transition to a 4-3 Cover 2 defense? I think the Vikings run a Tampa 2....are they instantly great because they run that schem??
Do you think that running a 4-3 guarantees turnovers? Maybe its athletes with a nose for the football like Tillman, Urlacher, Briggs, Peppers, etc that create turnovers...not the scheme.
Its an old arguement. Almost older than "we need a big RB, Draft Ron Dayne, Brandon Jacobs, etc"