View Single Post
Old 01-27-2013, 12:07 PM   #20
Vis
In Hoc
Supporter
 
Vis's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: SC
Posts: 8,393
Gender: Male
Member Number: 5117
Thanks: 878
Thanked 6,275 Times in 2,974 Posts
My Mood: Stressed
Default Re: "Put simply, we cannot allow the rights of a few to override the safety of all"

Quote:
Originally Posted by Killer View Post
You still don't get it

Rights belong to individuals not groups. Using her logic you could justify any violation of our Constitutional rights for the "greater good's" safety.

The rights of "the few" is exactly what our Constitution was written for.


you take your Feinsteins and I'll raise you a Thomas Jefferson



of course nanny state loyalists LIKE being slaves, they LIKE a government telling them what's good for them

yessa massa, wha ever you thinks best massa, yessa massa


"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote." - Benjamin Franklin.


Keep the racism to yourself.

Dan gets it. He understands the rights and the limits. You know half the story and seem to apply absolutism to only the 2nd amendment. It's not your fault you lack the education on the subject but it is your fault you don't admit that you do.
__________________


All generalizations are dangerous.
Vis is online now   Reply With Quote