Originally Posted by Hawaii 5-0
Vincent Jackson is a way better WR than Mike Wallace is, compare their 2012 stats:
Jackson 72 rec for 1384 yds 19.2 avg and 8 TDs
Wallace 64 rec for 836 yds 13.1 avg and 8 TDs
Yet people will say " but Mike is faster".
Well duh. If Mike Wallace didn't have straight line speed he'd be in the Canadian football league. His other wide receiver attributes are average at best.
Mike Wallace can't hold Santonio Holmes jock.
Will I miss the speed? Yup.
Replace it with decent speed, good hands and good route running (can be found through free agency or the 2nd round of the draft) and won't miss him.
Read this guys bio
He's a free agent, 6'3" and his attributes and cons remind me a lot of Mike Wallace.
Difference? Guy can probably be had for 2-4 million a year and he's 2" taller than Mike.