View Single Post
Old 02-09-2013, 06:49 PM   #29
jacobo
Starter
Points: 2,611, Level: 21 Points: 2,611, Level: 21 Points: 2,611, Level: 21
Activity: 15.1% Activity: 15.1% Activity: 15.1%
Last Achievements
 

Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 449
Member Number: 24766
Thanks: 186
Thanked 149 Times in 95 Posts
Default Re: Mike Wallace vs Swann, Ward etc.

He's a good number 2 at best. Numbers are misleading and anyone basing their entire argument on them is foolish. He's a poor route runner, soft, doesn't fight for the ball, has average hands, regularly disappears and is only "elite" at running in a line. He isn't a number one receiver. He isn't Fitz or either Johnson. Those guys didn't have a guy like Ben throwing them the ball their first few years. Numbers mean shit.
jacobo is offline   Reply With Quote