Originally Posted by Killer
Browns still don't have a QB - good luck with that.
no one can say one way or another what losing Wallace will mean -
I just know this:
Ward, El, Wilson = XL victory
Holmes, Ward, Washington = XLIII victory
I'm more concerned about Heath Miller's status than losing Wallace. Losing that type of weapon in both receptions AND what he meant for blocking really, really could mean a lot to the improvement of the offense
Beaver pics - don't think we're in much shape to do anything about this thread
Well, what do we do?
Why don't we just . . .wait here and post for a little while longer . . . see what happens?