View Single Post
Old 05-28-2007, 10:28 AM   #8
Atlanta Dan
Resigned
Supporter
 
Atlanta Dan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 14,271
Member Number: 728
Thanks: 1,952
Thanked 6,138 Times in 2,828 Posts
Default Re: Economy robust, middle class income dropping?

Quote:
Originally Posted by GBMelBlount View Post
Most of the President, CEO, CFO income is OUTCOMES / performance based.
Well, it is supposed to be, but the Wall Street Journal (not exactly a pillar of socialism) reported on this disgusting practice following 9-11.

"On Sept. 21, 2001, rescuers dug through the smoldering remains of the World Trade Center. Across town, families buried two firefighters found a week earlier. At Fort Drum, on the edge of New York's Adirondacks, soldiers readied for deployment halfway across the world.

Boards of directors of scores of American companies were also busy that day. They handed out millions of bargain-priced stock options to their top executives.

The terrorist attack shut the U.S. stock market for days. When it reopened Sept. 17, stocks skidded more than 14% over five days, in the worst full week for the Dow Jones Industrial Average since Germany invaded France in May 1940. But for recipients of options, the lower their company's stock price when options are awarded the better, since the options grant a right to buy shares at that price for years to come. The grants set recipients up for millions of dollars in profit if the shares recovered.

A Wall Street Journal analysis shows how some companies rushed, amid the post-9/11 stock-market decline, to give executives especially valuable options. A review of Standard & Poor's ExecuComp data for 1,800 leading companies indicates that from Sept. 17, 2001, through the end of the month, 511 top executives at 186 of these companies got stock-option grants. The number who received grants was 2.6 times as many as in the same stretch of September in 2000, and more than twice as many as in the like period in any other year between 1999 and 2003.

Ninety-one companies that didn't regularly grant stock options in September did so in the first two weeks of trading after the terror attack. Their grants were concentrated around Sept. 21, when the market reached its post-attack low. They were worth about $325 million when granted, based on a standard method of valuing stock options."


http://online.wsj.com/public/resourc...ntVersion=true


Stock options are a defensible means of rewarding performance when properly accounted for, but the practice of backdating options, the post 9-11 incidents described above, and the failure to account for the cost of these options when exercised are indicative of executive compensation practices that loot the company and often have little to do with a reward for a job well done.
Atlanta Dan is online now   Reply With Quote