Originally Posted by Livinginthe past
Tony, i've read that exhibition in circular logic and 'my opinion is better than your opinion' BS.
Quite frankly, its a bit boring having to state, then re-state every point 3 or 4 times just so you can say the direct opposite.
I don't mind attempting to clarify what I have typed and debating its merits but I find we rarely get anywhere once you sink your fangs into a debate - back and forth, back and forth.
I look at the original article and see there is very lttle in the way of in depth explanation of why the rankings fell the way they did - yet I am supposed to give a thesis on my rankings?
You asked me to tell you why I ranked Pittsburgh below certain teams - and I did so - and the best you can manage in response is 'lol' and to state the opposite.
Its me doing all the work here while you pick and choose what to respond to.
I've said my bit on the subject.
Geez Louise, Nigel - Tony has a different opinion than you do - so what?
This is, after all, a board of opinions.
If I were you, I wouldn't go bungee jumping any time soon.
and I most definitely would wear a turtleneck to bed at night.
(Bet you jumped, didn't ya?)