Re: Two for Tomlin
first off i'd like to say that was THE WORST call after a challenge i have ever seen...the man clearly caught the ball and was down by contact. that is what it should have been. how they came to the conclusion it wasn't a catch is beyond me. if it wasn't caught by him then it should have been an interception, because you can clearly see that the ball never touched the ground. what was the logic behind the ref saying "he barely got the second foot down," because if it is down...it is down. it doesn't matter if it is barely down or not.... after that ruling tomlin should have challenged that the ball touched the ground, therefore making it an interception
__________________
|