Originally Posted by Pidots55
i prefer Starks over Colon at RT. At least Starks is a good run blocker, looked impressive in the end of last season and was the starter in the SB team
Actually, Colon is a better run blocker and more athletic than Starks. The advantage that Starks has in pass protection is his size and long arms. Colon has shorter arms that allow defenders to get their hands on him and rip by.
Its basically a wash. Colon is smaller, but more active and battles his guy hard. Starks is bigger, longer arms, but seems to lack the intensity you would like to see.