Originally Posted by HAWK
The problem is there's such a thin line between right and wrong here. I've never been one to side with the defendant. But come on, there has to be a balance.
Where is the fine line in "In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district where in the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense