Originally Posted by Wallace108
I'm not convinced that Mike is going to be the same player that Maurkice is. Just because they're twins doesn't mean they're identical in every aspect. Would Mike still be such a "hot commodity" if Maurkice didn't have a successful rookie season?
I honestly think, if we take Mike he could be a Pro Bowler, but if anybody else does they will be a bit underwhelmed by his play. Chemistry factors in a lot to Oline play, and I think those two playing next to each other would make both of them that much better. But by themselves, Maurkice is still a great talent but you could tell when he was alone at Florida this year Mike just isn't on the same level. He's still good, but not "Maurkice" good.