Originally Posted by Buddha Bus
I think he was referring to the fact that Jack Ham is a Hall of Famer and played on one of the greatest, if not THE greatest, defense in NFL history. Also, if you feel that way about Ham, why the hell put him on your list of 3 to begin with? Seems pointless if all you were going to do is try to refute anyone who chose him.
I've really got to pick me up one of these "Thumper Brand Crystal Balls" that tell you exactly what would happen concerning any subject throughout history/alternate realities. I'd be a rich man by now!
Ham was 6-3, 224. He'd get tossed around like a rag doll in the
era that Lloyd and Harrison played in. 6-3, 224 is a thin guy. He's get
pounded today, hence if I had my choice, I'd take the other two guys
since they can bring the thunder than Ham never could. Harrison is
6-0, 242. Now that is SIZE and leverage. He totally disrupts offenses.
Ham was more of a put himself in position kind of guy - not a wrecking
ball, which both GL and JH are. You want my Crystal Ball? You got it.
It's called 224 is too small and no way does a 224 lb OLB make the
hall of fame on Pgh's recent teams.