Thread: Wide Recivers
View Single Post
Old 08-07-2011, 10:03 AM   #9
Living Legend
steeltheone's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Harrisburg Pa.
Posts: 3,522
Gender: Male
Member Number: 6351
Thanks: 334
Thanked 413 Times in 247 Posts
Default Re: Wide Recivers

Originally Posted by 55BaileyFan View Post
HInes is #1 and will be unless three receivers are on the field then he goes into the slot. Wallace will be the #2 except in three receiver sets then he becomes #1. Sanders is the three back, Brown will be on there as the #4.

I don't think Sweed will make the team, rather I will be surprised. I think Grisham has a good chance to make the roster. I also agree we are deeper at WR then we have been in years...without looking at a roster sheet on the net...who was the 4 or 5 guy when our starting three was Ward, Burress, and EL?

We are deep at the WR spot and STACKED at the RB spot...we are going to have a good offense this year.
The younger set of Burress, Ward an El is much better at this point to Wallace , Ward old, unproven Sanders and Brown.

Rbs are ok...Under Mendy you have old Moore and a unproven Redman, Batch and Dwyer again it's ok ..nothing great ...I'm more worried about the wideouts with Sanders injured.
Perfection is not attainable, but if we chase perfection we can catch excellence." - Vince Lombardi
steeltheone is offline   Reply With Quote