View Single Post
Old 01-31-2012, 08:01 AM   #17
Wing Kong Exchange - CEO
steelfury02's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,111
Member Number: 6076
Thanks: 3,543
Thanked 3,451 Times in 1,640 Posts
My Mood: Fine
Default Re: Why would we give up on Gay now?

anything can happen to any secondary against any good WRs/Tight Ends

Our secondary got Tebowed

The #31whatever ranked defense in the league stepped up and played well enough all the ways to the Super Bowl (Patriots) Many consider the Giants secondary to be weak so it just goes to show you what stats mean

The supposed game changers of Green Bay's secondary got exposed as a liability whereas last year they were the biggest asset outside of Rodgers and the WRs.

Keeping or losing Gay is not going to make or break the team. Red zone efficiency, turnovers and protection for Ben are paramount

I'd be more worried about the lines as well, and honestly - the ILBs are a major concern over this IMHO

Insanity or In-sahn-naha-teh
is what the the Iro-quois used
meaning "severe personnel problems".
Look it up. No? No, I'm right.
Agree to disagree.
steelfury02 is offline   Reply With Quote