Why register with the Steelers Fever Forums?
 • Intelligent and friendly discussions.
 • It's free and it's quick. Always.
 • Enter events in the forums calendar.
 • Very user friendly software.
 • Exclusive contests and giveaways.

 Donate to Steelers Fever, Click here
 Our 2013 Goal: $400.00 - To Date: $00.00 (00.00%)
 Home | Forums | Editorials | Shop | Tickets | Downloads | Contact Pittsburgh Steelers Forum Feed Not Just Fans. Hardcore Fans.

Go Back   Steelers Fever Forums > Steelers Football > Pittsburgh Steelers


Steelers Fever Fan Shop

Doc's Sports Get FREE NFL Picks and College Football picks as well as Football Lines like live NFL Lines and updated NFL Power Rankings all at Doc's Sports Service.

Steelers Steelers - Browns Bills
September 7, 2014, 1:00pmET

CBS
View Poll Results: Keep Wallace or Let him Walk for the draft pick?
Keep Him and Pay the money 17 51.52%
Hope someone pays him and give me the draft pick 16 48.48%
Voters: 33. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-01-2012, 06:55 AM   #1
mesaSteeler
A Son of Martha
Supporter
 

Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 7,976
Gender: Male
Member Number: 10438
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Steelers taking calculated risk with Wallace

The Steel Mill
News and updates about the Pittsburgh Steelers
http://blog.triblive.com/steel-mill/...-with-wallace/


Steelers taking calculated risk with Wallace

February 29th, 2012

The deadline for using franchise tags is Monday, but the Steelers have all but decided they won’t use one on receiver Mike Wallace.
The cost of a franchise tag for wide receivers — it is projected at a little under $9.5 million — isn’t feasible for a team that is right up against the projected 2012 salary cap and has more on its offseason to-do list than just signing Wallace.
There is a risk in placing the highest tender on restricted free agents, as the Steelers are set to do with Wallace.

Teams that would have had to give up first- and third-round picks in the past to sign Wallace only lose a first-round pick if they lure him away from the Steelers.
That change in the collective bargaining agreement — and cost — has stirred speculation that Wallace will be one of the more sought-after free agents come March 13 at 4 p.m., with the line for his services forming behind San Francisco.
Or New England.
Or Cincinnati.
Or Baltimore.

The reality is that the cost of signing Wallace away from the Steelers is still a prohibitive one.

Teams that have to give up a first-round pick for Wallace also have to overpay the Pro Bowler since the Steelers have the right to match any offer.
That combination is why Ravens general manager Ozzie Newsome said last week at the NFL Scouting Combine that he would be hesitant to sign a high-profile restricted free agent.

It is also enough of a deterrent for me to think that Wallace is anything but as good as gone if the Steelers don’t use the franchise tag on him.
I know it only takes one team –- and the Patriots, it should be noted, are flush with extra draft picks and salary cap space -– to overpay for a player.
And that it happens every year during free agency.
But the Steelers, given their own constraints and what they would receive if they lose Wallace, won’t be rolling the dice when they offer him the highest tender.
They will be taking a calculated risk, and one that is the correct play when it comes to Wallace.

– Scott Brown
mesaSteeler is offline  
Old 03-01-2012, 08:56 AM   #2
Kingmagyar
Team Captain
 

Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 937
Gender: Male
Member Number: 16118
Thanks: 12
Thanked 196 Times in 105 Posts
Default Re: Steelers taking calculated risk with Wallace

What if a team made an offer that was like for a 15 million roster bonus but only a per year rate of 1 million per year for 5 years. It would be a 5 year 20 million dollar deal (4 mil per) and the Steelers couldn't match it because of the huge roster bonus. A team would get Wallace for like 4 mil per year and Wallace would be stuck playing for that unless he can refuse to sign that. By refusing he must play for the steelers at around 3 mil.for one year, which would be ironic but bad in the long run as he would become an UFA the next year and we would lose him and not get anything but a compensatory pick in return. One of the negatives for Wallace is the offer from another team is non negotiable.

Patriots could be outbid by a team overpaying Wallace. San Francisco and even Chicago a more desperate team for a wideout could make crazy offers to Wallace. New England won't break the bank in regards to Wallace or anyone not named Brady.
Kingmagyar is offline  
Old 03-01-2012, 09:42 AM   #3
Steel Peon
Starter
 
Steel Peon's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Erie, PA
Posts: 445
Gender: Male
Member Number: 17520
Thanks: 361
Thanked 192 Times in 90 Posts
My Mood: Drunk
Default Re: Steelers taking calculated risk with Wallace

Here is my Top 3 list of teams that SHOULD be trying for wallace:

1) Carolina - Cam Newton needs a great target to throw perfect passes to.
2) New Orleans - A deep threat in Brees' hands would be deadly, mainly because it would free up the other targets he like to spread it out to.
3) Green Bay - Again, a deep threat in the hands of Rodgers........yikes.

Honorable mention: Buffalo - Fitzpatrick could really use a dependable receiver.
Steel Peon is offline  
Old 03-01-2012, 09:44 AM   #4
BLACK_AND_YELLOW
Head Coach
 
BLACK_AND_YELLOW's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,830
Gender: Male
Member Number: 18312
Thanks: 771
Thanked 2,199 Times in 1,037 Posts
My Mood: Relaxed
Default Re: Steelers taking calculated risk with Wallace

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steel Peon View Post
Here is my Top 3 list of teams that SHOULD be trying for wallace:

1) Carolina - Cam Newton needs a great target to throw perfect passes to.
2) New Orleans - A deep threat in Brees' hands would be deadly, mainly because it would free up the other targets he like to spread it out to.
3) Green Bay - Again, a deep threat in the hands of Rodgers........yikes.

Honorable mention: Buffalo - Fitzpatrick could really use a dependable receiver.
New Orleans dont have a first round pick.....
BLACK_AND_YELLOW is offline  
Old 03-01-2012, 09:48 AM   #5
Curtain_of_Steel
Head Coach
Supporter
 

Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,631
Member Number: 11678
Thanks: 54
Thanked 58 Times in 40 Posts
Default Re: Steelers taking calculated risk with Wallace

Wallace stated he wanted a top QB. I'm thinking Carolina is out, and Newton already passed for a ton of yards, I dont think he needs a WR as much as they need help on Def.

Saints are out.

GB, not sure of their cap number, but I'm thinking they won't go for him.

PATS, Ravens(although flacco doesnt meet the criteria of a great qb, lol)
Curtain_of_Steel is offline  
Old 03-01-2012, 11:20 AM   #6
Fire Arians
Anti-Spammer Mod
 
Fire Arians's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 10,110
Member Number: 16570
Thanks: 1,673
Thanked 6,132 Times in 2,631 Posts
My Mood: Yeehaw
Default Re: Steelers taking calculated risk with Wallace

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steel Peon View Post
Here is my Top 3 list of teams that SHOULD be trying for wallace:

1) Carolina - Cam Newton needs a great target to throw perfect passes to.
2) New Orleans - A deep threat in Brees' hands would be deadly, mainly because it would free up the other targets he like to spread it out to.
3) Green Bay - Again, a deep threat in the hands of Rodgers........yikes.

Honorable mention: Buffalo - Fitzpatrick could really use a dependable receiver.
i will throw a freakin party if carolina signs him
Fire Arians is offline  
Old 03-01-2012, 11:57 AM   #7
Set-Man
Bench Warmer
 

Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 165
Member Number: 12795
Thanks: 0
Thanked 19 Times in 10 Posts
Default Re: Steelers taking calculated risk with Wallace

Actually the Steelers admin has the upper hand in this one.
We lose too many players without getting anything for them, unlike the Patriots who do a great job in racking up draft picks.
If we do lose him then at least we gt a first rounder. how many times have we been able to say that?
I don't care if it is the last pick, there will be a quality player available that firs one of our deficiencies - OL, DL, corner.
They can pick a random speedster in the later rounds if one is available to get the next Wallace (one trick pony).
Set-Man is offline  
Old 03-01-2012, 12:23 PM   #8
Steel_Bus_24
Team Owner
 
Steel_Bus_24's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,576
Member Number: 2886
Thanks: 250
Thanked 794 Times in 407 Posts
Default Re: Steelers taking calculated risk with Wallace

Im sick of that Wallace is mediocre BS....Hes not just some dime a dozen speedster.....his speed is truly special

[YOUTUBE]bDdr6I-j1lw[/YOUTUBE]

Finding Gems like Wallace in the draft isn't like going down to the grocery store and picking up some milk


Hes not all time great, but he means a lot to this offense....an offense that already struggles to put up 20
__________________

Also Known as SteelerSpartan
Steel_Bus_24 is online now  
Old 03-01-2012, 12:44 PM   #9
Fire Arians
Anti-Spammer Mod
 
Fire Arians's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 10,110
Member Number: 16570
Thanks: 1,673
Thanked 6,132 Times in 2,631 Posts
My Mood: Yeehaw
Default Re: Steelers taking calculated risk with Wallace

if we lose wallace i see either 2 things happening

cotch gets resigned to a multi-year deal

or

we draft a running back in rds 1-3, and emphasise more on a running game

best case scenario is we keep wallace and nobody else outbids us, but i don't think that'll be happening. i don't think the patriots will go after him though tbh. they have way too many holes on defense that need to be addressed. not to mention they already have welker, gronk, and hernandez. their offense really does not have a need for playmakers at wr. if anything the main thing that will make their offense downright scary is a good running back
Fire Arians is offline  
Old 03-01-2012, 12:50 PM   #10
Sixburgher
Banned
 

Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 685
Member Number: 17648
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Steelers taking calculated risk with Wallace

Quote:
Originally Posted by Set-Man View Post
We lose too many players without getting anything for them, unlike the Patriots who do a great job in racking up draft picks.
Like whom? The only player I can think of recently that we "lost" who was actually a serious contributor was Holmes who has since turned into a clubhouse cancer with the Jets.
Sixburgher is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Shoutbox provided by vBShout v6.2.1 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.0.8 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd. Runs best on HiVelocity Hosting.
Navbar with Avatar by Motorradforum
no new posts