Why register with the Steelers Fever Forums?
 • Intelligent and friendly discussions.
 • It's free and it's quick. Always.
 • Enter events in the forums calendar.
 • Very user friendly software.
 • Exclusive contests and giveaways.

 Donate to Steelers Fever, Click here
 Our 2014 Goal: $450.00 - To Date: $450.00 (100.00%)
 Home | Forums | Editorials | Shop | Tickets | Downloads | Contact Pittsburgh Steelers Forum Feed Not Just Fans. Hardcore Fans.

Go Back   Steelers Fever Forums > Steelers Football > Pittsburgh Steelers


Steelers Fever Fan Shop

Doc's Sports Get FREE NFL Picks and College Football picks as well as Football Lines like live NFL Lines and updated NFL Power Rankings all at Doc's Sports Service.

Steelers Fever Presents...

Steelers Panthers

GAMEDAY
Sunday, September 21, 8:30 PM
NBC
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-09-2012, 05:40 PM   #1
3rdandlong
Bench Warmer
 
3rdandlong's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 209
Member Number: 17001
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Default Don't Be Too Concerned If We Don't Sign Wallace

Mike Wallace may not sign with the Steelers. I don't think we will necessarily be worse offensively if we don't sign him.

I was lookin at his receiving stats today. He only had two touchdowns in the red zone. Most of his touchdowns were of the 40+ yard variety. When we got in the red zone his speed was not much of a factor. It was our inability to score touchdowns consistently in the red zone that made the offense less than it should have been.

If we lose Wallace, we'll get a first round pick. We could use that to draft an offensive lineman. Running the ball better in the red zone is something the Steelers need to improve on. Perhaps we can address that in e draft with the Wallace pick. If not the offensive line, we can still replenish the defense. So either way I look at it I dont think it would be as bad to lose Wallace as some think.
3rdandlong is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2012, 06:26 PM   #2
NoFieldFive
Starter
 

Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 530
Member Number: 10965
Thanks: 12
Thanked 151 Times in 73 Posts
Default Re: Don't Be Too Concerned If We Don't Sign Wallace

play calling sucked - red zone especially. that's where you use Miller or short pass out out of the backfield. I don't put the lack of TD's on Wallace or any receiver....play calling sucked

and when we did run in the red zone - 3 of the same plays right up the middle for a gain of zero. if we had 5 downs to get the TD we would have run it 5 straight times.

did I mention play calling sucked?
NoFieldFive is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2012, 07:04 PM   #3
6RingsAndCounting
Bench Warmer
 
6RingsAndCounting's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Youngstown, Ohio
Posts: 360
Gender: Male
Member Number: 21067
Thanks: 3
Thanked 18 Times in 13 Posts
Default Re: Don't Be Too Concerned If We Don't Sign Wallace

But who knows if we get to the redzone without Wallace though? I mean, Arians wouldn't have had anyone to gain all those yards with bubble screens and streaks without him.
__________________
I Tweet A Lot
6RingsAndCounting is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2012, 07:34 PM   #4
AgentGold007
Banned
 

Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 442
Member Number: 20176
Thanks: 292
Thanked 316 Times in 158 Posts
My Mood: Cool
Default Re: Don't Be Too Concerned If We Don't Sign Wallace

Ask Antonio Brown, who benefits alot from the double-teams Mike Wallace draws, how much he'll be concerned if we don't sign Wallace. Brown is an excellent #2 receiver, but only time will tell if he can shoulder the load without Wallace.
AgentGold007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2012, 08:28 PM   #5
finesward
Team Captain
 

Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 719
Member Number: 14448
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: Don't Be Too Concerned If We Don't Sign Wallace

Quote:
Originally Posted by AgentGold007 View Post
Ask Antonio Brown, who benefits alot from the double-teams Mike Wallace draws, how much he'll be concerned if we don't sign Wallace. Brown is an excellent #2 receiver, but only time will tell if he can shoulder the load without Wallace.


We've heard this before, and I don't think there is really much validity to this at all. Look at the top receivers in the league, and then look at the #2's on those teams. Find one that has better stats or who you would think would make a better #1 receiver on this team. I'm taking Brown 10/10 times. If we won SB's with Hines and Holmes being #1's then there is no reason to think we can't with Brown. I think Brown will be as good as Holmes was as our #1. He makes all the tough catches, can make plays after the catch which safeties have to respect, and runs crisp clean routes. And if Brown starts trailing off like Wallace did then Sanders, Cotch, or whoever steps up.

Having a shot to legitimately shore up our O-line or revamp the defense at this point is a no-brainer. Ben will only have so many more years of being able to scramble around.
finesward is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2012, 08:41 PM   #6
Curtain_of_Steel
Head Coach
Supporter
 

Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,637
Member Number: 11678
Thanks: 56
Thanked 59 Times in 41 Posts
My Mood: Amazed
Default Re: Don't Be Too Concerned If We Don't Sign Wallace

And it continues. Brown is great, wallace sucks, lol We dont need Wallace he did nothing 2nd half, blah blah blah.

Sanders won't finish the season, mark my words. WARD is not the answer, Crotchery is not a Wallace replacement. They will not sign a top flight WR if Wallace leaves.
Curtain_of_Steel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2012, 08:52 PM   #7
3rdandlong
Bench Warmer
 
3rdandlong's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 209
Member Number: 17001
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Default Re: Don't Be Too Concerned If We Don't Sign Wallace

Quote:
Originally Posted by Curtain_of_Steel View Post
And it continues. Brown is great, wallace sucks, lol We dont need Wallace he did nothing 2nd half, blah blah blah.

Sanders won't finish the season, mark my words. WARD is not the answer, Crotchery is not a Wallace replacement. They will not sign a top flight WR if Wallace leaves.
Who said Wallace sucks? I'm just saying I don't think the scoring will necessarily suffer if we can upgrade some other areas
3rdandlong is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2012, 09:03 PM   #8
Curtain_of_Steel
Head Coach
Supporter
 

Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,637
Member Number: 11678
Thanks: 56
Thanked 59 Times in 41 Posts
My Mood: Amazed
Default Re: Don't Be Too Concerned If We Don't Sign Wallace

They will not upgrade the run game. They have eluded to the fact they will mostlikely go with what they have. they will not sign an impact Olineman. Therefore the run game won't be much better or it will be managable. The steelers are not a run first team. they are a pass first team. The league evolved to a pass first league. They will not buck the trend and run and run some more.

So where do you want to upgrade? The kicker?lol

The DB's played 20 plus yards back against Wallace and his deep routes in the 2nd half, picking up on the line than double teaming him late.
Why is it that people refuse to listen when the announcers pointed this out several times during the games.

Run game is marginal at best, and with the guys we have, although I like Redman, is unproven. Dwyer, unproven. Batch what did he do last year aside from tripping trying to race Sanders to the food line and they both got hurt, lol. Again, unproven. Same Oline, if not potentially weaker as Colon will be in a diff position and Gilbert a different position.
Curtain_of_Steel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2012, 10:03 PM   #9
pittpete
Bench Warmer
 

Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: New York
Posts: 382
Member Number: 5301
Thanks: 113
Thanked 215 Times in 125 Posts
Default Re: Don't Be Too Concerned If We Don't Sign Wallace

4 POSTSEASON GAMES EACH
Wallace
16 rec----141 yards----8.8 avg----1 TD

A.Brown
10rec----160 yards-----16 avg-----0 TD

Brown wasnt even a starter in 2010........
Just saying
__________________
pittpete is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2012, 10:17 PM   #10
AgentGold007
Banned
 

Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 442
Member Number: 20176
Thanks: 292
Thanked 316 Times in 158 Posts
My Mood: Cool
Default Re: Don't Be Too Concerned If We Don't Sign Wallace

Quote:
Originally Posted by finesward View Post


We've heard this before, and I don't think there is really much validity to this at all. Look at the top receivers in the league, and then look at the #2's on those teams. Find one that has better stats or who you would think would make a better #1 receiver on this team. I'm taking Brown 10/10 times. If we won SB's with Hines and Holmes being #1's then there is no reason to think we can't with Brown. I think Brown will be as good as Holmes was as our #1. He makes all the tough catches, can make plays after the catch which safeties have to respect, and runs crisp clean routes. And if Brown starts trailing off like Wallace did then Sanders, Cotch, or whoever steps up.

Having a shot to legitimately shore up our O-line or revamp the defense at this point is a no-brainer. Ben will only have so many more years of being able to scramble around.
I'm not disputing Brown's abilities to be a #1 at all. Like I said, time will tell. I'm just saying that his life is alot easier when he has a guy like Wallace drawing Revis, Ashomugha, Woodson, or Bailey as opposed to less physical nickelbacks. And as far as the top #1 receivers and their #2's goes, I'm pretty sure the dropoff in talent is a lot more significant in those situations, than it is between Wallace and Brown.
AgentGold007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
agent, free, wallace


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Shoutbox provided by vBShout v6.2.1 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.0.8 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd. Runs best on HiVelocity Hosting.
Navbar with Avatar by Motorradforum
no new posts