Why register with the Steelers Fever Forums?
 • Intelligent and friendly discussions.
 • It's free and it's quick. Always.
 • Enter events in the forums calendar.
 • Very user friendly software.
 • Exclusive contests and giveaways.

 Donate to Steelers Fever, Click here
 Our 2013 Goal: $400.00 - To Date: $00.00 (00.00%)
 Home | Forums | Editorials | Shop | Tickets | Downloads | Contact Pittsburgh Steelers Forum Feed Not Just Fans. Hardcore Fans.

Go Back   Steelers Fever Forums > General Football > NFL Football


Steelers Fever Fan Shop

Doc's Sports Get FREE NFL Picks and College Football picks as well as Football Lines like live NFL Lines and updated NFL Power Rankings all at Doc's Sports Service.

Steelers Steelers - Referees    Browns

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-26-2012, 02:55 PM   #1
mesaSteeler
A Son of Martha
Supporter
 

Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 7,976
Gender: Male
Member Number: 10438
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Union leader: Facts prove NFL collusion claim

Union leader: Facts prove NFL collusion claim
About The Tribune-Review
The Tribune-Review can be reached via e-mail or at 412-321-6460.
http://triblive.com/sports/steelers/...n-teams-action
By The Associated Press

Published: Thursday, May 24, 2012, 10:58 p.m.
Updated: Friday, May 25, 2012

WASHINGTON — NFL players union chief DeMaurice Smith says his group’s claim of collusion will stand up in court.

The NFL Players Association claimed in U.S. District Court in Minnesota on Wednesday that the 32 teams had a secret salary cap in place during the uncapped 2010 season, and that it cost players at least $1 billion in wages.

“Cartels do what cartels will do when left unchecked,” Smith said Thursday outside union headquarters. “The facts justify the complaint.”

On Wednesday, hours after the court action, the NFL issued a statement saying “the union’s claims have absolutely no merit and we fully expect them to be dismissed.”

NFL spokesman Greg Aiello also said: “There was no collusion. There was no agreement. These claims are totally unfounded.”

The union has spent much of the offseason challenging the league on a variety of issues — from punishment handed down by Commissioner Roger Goodell for the alleged roles of four players in the Saints’ bounties program to appeals in drug-related discipline. Now comes the court action in Minnesota, filed one day after the Washington Redskins and Dallas Cowboys had grievances dismissed after having their salary caps reduced for this season and next.

The Redskins are losing $36 million and the Cowboys $10 million for overspending during the uncapped season — a revelation that, in part, spurred the union’s claim of collusion.

“When we feel those rules are violated, we will, on behalf of our players, always act in their best interest,” Smith said.

“The 32 teams are defendants of the action right now. If there is evidence that is developed later on that would demonstrate that any one of those teams did not abide by the conspiracy, then my guess is those teams will make the appropriate assertions, and we’ll see where we end up.”

The complaint claims that “conspiracy” set a $123 million salary cap for the 2010 season, when owners did not have the authority to do so.

According to the league, the CBA signed last August to end the 4 1-2 month lockout had clauses precluding the union from filing such a complaint. But NFLPA outside counsel Jeffrey Kessler disputed that Wednesday, saying a portion of those clauses was rejected by the court.

“It doesn’t sound like you’re denying the existence of collusion, does it?” Smith said.

As for the discord between the union and the league, Smith said it shouldn’t be surprising.

“We all got along, and the league locked us out,” Smith said. “We certainly had players across history who left every bit of blood, sweat and tears on the field. And yet, the National Football League continues to fight us on a number of workers’ comp cases.”
mesaSteeler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2012, 04:20 PM   #2
TRH
Living Legend
 
TRH's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: eastern PA
Posts: 4,388
Gender: Male
Member Number: 17206
Thanks: 98
Thanked 222 Times in 155 Posts
Default Re: Union leader: Facts prove NFL collusion claim

can we do anything in this country anymore without lawsuits? Man, its getting frustrating just reading the headlines anymore, let alone the stuff in the stories.
TRH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2012, 04:30 PM   #3
ricardisimo
Administrator
 
ricardisimo's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Lalaland
Posts: 5,399
Gender: Male
Member Number: 15369
Thanks: 296
Thanked 814 Times in 393 Posts
Default Re: Union leader: Facts prove NFL collusion claim

Quote:
Originally Posted by TRH View Post
can we do anything in this country anymore without lawsuits? Man, its getting frustrating just reading the headlines anymore, let alone the stuff in the stories.
I went to the bathroom this morning, then had breakfast and coffee, all without filing any lawsuits.

I think some better questions are:
  • Can companies content themselves with, say, $6B?
  • Must they still try to rip off their customers and workers on top of that?
  • How much money is enough?
__________________
Why does God hate amputees?
ricardisimo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2012, 06:34 PM   #4
Atlanta Dan
Resigned
Supporter
 
Atlanta Dan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 13,642
Member Number: 728
Thanks: 1,592
Thanked 5,086 Times in 2,377 Posts
Default Re: Union leader: Facts prove NFL collusion claim

Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardisimo View Post

I think some better questions are:
  • Can companies content themselves with, say, $6B?
  • Must they still try to rip off their customers and workers on top of that?
  • How much money is enough?
No
Yes
Having all of it

[youtube]Muz1OcEzJOs[/youtube]
Atlanta Dan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2012, 04:03 PM   #5
Atlanta Dan
Resigned
Supporter
 
Atlanta Dan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 13,642
Member Number: 728
Thanks: 1,592
Thanked 5,086 Times in 2,377 Posts
Default Re: Union leader: Facts prove NFL collusion claim

Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardisimo View Post
I think some better questions are:
  • Can companies content themselves with, say, $6B?
  • Must they still try to rip off their customers and workers on top of that?
  • How much money is enough?
Ask Don Draper

Don's meeting with Dow Chemical in last night's episode of Mad Men answers your questions

"Even though success is a reality its effects are temporary. You get hungry even though you've just eaten."... "You're happy with 50 percent? You're on top and you don't have enough. You're happy because you're successful for now, but what is happiness? It's a moment before you need more happiness. I won't settle for 50 percent of anything. I want 100 percent."

http://www.examiner.com/article/mad-...s-recap-quotes
Atlanta Dan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Shoutbox provided by vBShout v6.2.1 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.0.8 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd. Runs best on HiVelocity Hosting.
Navbar with Avatar by Motorradforum
no new posts