U.S. Ambassador to Libya, 3 Other Embassy Staff Killed in Rocket Attack

[tony hipchest]

Originally Posted by MACH1

So Bush used drones to take out terrrorists and was deemed a war criminal and obama uses them the same and he is somehow labeled a hero, peace prize winner?
The hypocrisy boggles the mind.

Lets make more excuses for obama.



You would think when something like this happens he could take just one day off from panhandling to do his job.

America 'was warned of embassy attack but did nothing'

youre not really suggesting that these libyan embassy attacks are on the same scale as 9-11 are you?

before GW took office in jan '01 clinton basically handed GW indisputable proof that osama bin laden was an imminent threat along with his head on a platter.

GW did nothing with the intelligence (not the first OR last time with that bozo).

[MACH1]

Uh no but you can blame bush all you want. As far as clinton, how many times could he have taken out obl and chose not to.

Funny how everything comes down to being bush's fault.

What happens in vegas stays in vegas.

In my opinion, there's plenty of blame to go around. It's time to pull out of the Middle East and end all aid.

I'm certainly not one of those who blames America for what happened on 9/11, but our policies on the Middle East aren't working. I used to argue with Ric about this, but I'm beginning to see things his way. Since 9/11, we've invaded two countries, killed hundreds of thousands of innocent people, including women and children, and have spent trillions of dollars in an effort to make us safer. How has that worked out for us?

How many more countries do we have to invade? How many more hundreds of thousands of innocent people do we have to kill? How many more billions (or trillions) of dollars do we have to spend? How many more of our own soldiers do we have to lose? All to be at the same place we started off at ... if not a worse place.

[Killer]

OBAMA'S FOREIGN POLICY NOW IN FLAMES

A U.S. ambassador is dead, and over 30 U.S. embassies across the globe are under violent attack as a direct result of President Obama’s attempted appeasement of radical Islam. How many more Americans will die before that policy can be reversed and Obama removed from office?

Keep in mind that by international treaty and tradition, every embassy in a foreign nation is considered the sovereign soil of that nation. Climbing a wall and invading an embassy compound is the same as invading that country.

The horrific events of Sept. 11, 2012, in Egypt and Benghazi were a logical and predictable result of appeasement policies that began with Obama’s 2009 speech in Cairo apologizing for America’s past insensitivities to the hopes and beliefs of the Muslim faith.

Obama chose last Tuesday, the 11th anniversary of the 2001 murder of over 3,000 Americans by a team of radical Islamists, to send a formal message to the world: “The U.S. will never be at war with Islam.”

At that moment a crowd of over 2,000 Islamists were attacking the U.S. Embassy in Cairo, breaching its wall and burning the American flag

http://www.wnd.com/2012/09/obamas-fo...now-in-flames/

[Vincent]

Originally Posted by MACH1

Uh no but you can blame bush all you want. As far as clinton, how many times could he have taken out obl and chose not to.

Funny how everything comes down to being bush's fault.

If, by some cosmic anomaly, the post turtle is reelected, who is he going to blame the unholy mess "he inherited" on this time?

[ricardisimo]

Originally Posted by Vincent

If, by some cosmic anomaly, the post turtle is reelected, who is he going to blame the unholy mess "he inherited" on this time?

Obama's reelection, sadly, is as certain as the sun rising in the morning. Incumbency - along with massive corporate support - trumps all else. It helps that he's also a violent sociopath, since that seems to be de rigueur. May I ask what leads you to believe he will lose?

[Atlanta Dan]

Originally Posted by ricardisimo

May I ask what leads you to believe he will lose?

For a lot of reasons I cannot pretend to know what Vincent believes - but here is as a fun fact

Only one U.S. president has been re-elected since World War II with a jobless rate above 6 percent. Ronald Reagan won a second term with the rate on Election Day 1984 at 7.2 percent, having dropped almost 3 percentage points in the previous 18 months.

http://www.businessweek.com/news/201...-falls.html#p2

[Vincent]

Originally Posted by ricardisimo

May I ask what leads you to believe he will lose?

30 million+ of my countrymen who slumbered in November of 08 are now irritated with the events of the last 4 years. Concurrently, a smaller, but significant number of numbskulls that did show up in 08 are now disillusioned by the events of the last 4 years.





Things are not trending well for the current "violent sociopath".

[MACH1]

Not if Soros gets his way.

GEORGE SOROS WILL CONTROL YOUR VOTES IN THE UP COMING PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION.

http://itmakessenseblog.com/2012/04/...tial-election/

Scary shit if true and I don't care what side of the isle your on.

[MasterOfPuppets]

Originally Posted by Wallace108

In my opinion, there's plenty of blame to go around. It's time to pull out of the Middle East and end all aid.

I'm certainly not one of those who blames America for what happened on 9/11, but our policies on the Middle East aren't working. I used to argue with Ric about this, but I'm beginning to see things his way. Since 9/11, we've invaded two countries, killed hundreds of thousands of innocent people, including women and children, and have spent trillions of dollars in an effort to make us safer. How has that worked out for us?

.

they may not be working for us common tax paying schmucks ,but they're certainly working for others. somewhere in this country corporate CEO's are going CHAAACHING !!! everytime a bullet or missile is fired. companies like lockheed, raython, haliburton, blackwater , have probably increased their stock value by 500%
then there's the new oil contracts. companies that didn't have oil contracts before have them now.
as i've said all along , look at who is profiting from events and you'll get a better picture of US foreign policies.
does anyone really believe the dick cheney / haliburton connection is just a coincidence? or how about the rice / chevron connection ?

Condi Rice, the man with the plan, worked for Chevron right up till Jan. 15th 2001, 5 days before she went to work for President Bush in his cabinet. But she was already working for him heading up what she called “The Vulcans”… that was Bush’s foreign policy advisory team which consisted of many war-mongering neoconservatives. As it just so happens, Chevron ended up buying Unocal, and therefore their interests in the Afghanistan pipeline.

So, the woman who had the war plans for the invasion of Afghanistan 2 days prior to 9/11, just happened to work for the company that got part of that contract to build the pipeline that was the basis for the “carpet of bombs” threat leveled at the Taliban. Not only that, but Chevron even named a tanker after her.

http://willyloman.wordpress.com/2009...ys-before-911/