|
|
Why register with the Steelers Fever Forums? • Intelligent and friendly discussions. • It's free and it's quick. Always. • Enter events in the forums calendar. • Very user friendly software. • Exclusive contests and giveaways. |
|
Donate to Steelers Fever, Click here |
Our 2013 Goal: $400.00 - To Date: $00.00 (00.00%) |
| Home | Forums | Editorials | Shop | Tickets | Downloads | Contact |
|
|||||||

Get FREE NFL Picks and College Football picks as well as Football Lines like live NFL Lines and updated NFL Power Rankings all at Doc's Sports Service.
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Banned
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,353
Member Number: 24211
Thanks: 32
Thanked 93 Times in 75 Posts
|
Anybody notice how the seemingly "great" defenses are giving up a lot of points in the playoffs? We've seen final scores of 38-35, 45-31, and 30-28. Wallace and Mendenhall are likely gone, as are Starks and at least one of Colon or Foster. Heath Miller may not be ready for the start of the 2013 season. For a team that needs more from its offense, that unit won't exactly be put into a position to succeed next season if this upcoming draft is mostly about defense.
I won't be disappointed if the Steelers draft a pass-rushing OLB in one of the higher rounds, but this team will desperately need at least a TE, RB, a tall WR, and maybe even another OG above any other defensive position. Resigning Plax also needs to be an option for depth. |
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to GoFor7 For This Useful Post: | teegre (01-13-2013) |
|
|
#2 |
|
Living Legend
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 3,475
Member Number: 24108
Thanks: 1,000
Thanked 843 Times in 547 Posts
|
I hear what you're saying. Overload one side of the ball. It's clever.
Let me counter with a few thoughts. 1. Resign Wallace. He had a bad year... and was still good. If he's resigned, then no need for a WR. 2. Heath's injury made TE a need. But, Paulson looks like a good #2 (pass catcher, but not blocker). Maybe a third TE, to replace Pope. 3. I'm not a fan of taking a RB early. It's a weak draft at the top... but, a deep draft. I'd add a RB to compete... but, honestly, I'm not sure any RB not drafted would be better than what the Steelers already have. Maybe a rookie "could" be better, but maybe not; no one blows me away in this draft. I say draft Lattimore, IR him until week 7, and then insert him into the line-up. 4. The one area where the Steelers could upgrade is LG (Warmack, Cooper, Barrett Jones). That would help ANY RB. That said, I think that they go with Beachum (or Foster). 5. DEFENSE The Steelers could be a smothering type of defense, if they add a few parts. The secondary was great, and adding a young S will only make it better. Troy had his "injured season" this season; next season is his healthy season. (He alternates seasons.) Harrison was coming on at the end. Adding a young OLB (rotating with Harrison) will help keep him fresh. Woodley will get a kick in his butt, and come back to his 12-sack form for next season. McClendon will get a chance to start. And, Heyward will rotate. Lastly, Spence should be an upgrade. SUMMATION: If it were somewhere in between, here's what I would propose. R1: S R2: OLB R3: WR (tall) R4: RB (Lattimore) R5: TE |
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to teegre For This Useful Post: | pete74 (01-13-2013) |
|
|
#3 |
|
Team President
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 2,310
Member Number: 24400
Thanks: 113
Thanked 632 Times in 413 Posts
|
R1. Dion Jordan
R2. Robert Woods / Giovani Bernard R3. Nico Johnson R4. Robert Lester All we need is a RB and we're fine. Delanie Walker and Martellus Bennett are both UFA's and won't command top dollar as a stop-gap TE. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Team Captain
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Over in the heat
Posts: 894
Gender: Male
Member Number: 15446
Thanks: 65
Thanked 48 Times in 38 Posts
|
Rd 1- RB
Rd 2- LB Rd 3- TE/Backup QB (if the Steelers cannot acquire one through trade) Rd 4 -SS Rd-5- WR |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Starter
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 469
Member Number: 24000
Thanks: 31
Thanked 93 Times in 66 Posts
|
I would have to agree many people including myself wanted a heavy defensive draft. However looking at the teams like you said in the playoffs they all can put up points in bunches.
And looking at our defense without our older stars Harrison Hampton foote Troy and Clark and ill add dabread we have a lineup that looks like Safety- Robert golden a guy the organization likes. No one really after him Corner- ike( few more years) lewis( I believe we resign him), Allen, brown Olb- Woolley, worlds( led our team in sacks till last game with limited time), not much after them Ilb- Timmons, spence, slyvester De- heyward, hood, fangupo, woods Nt- McClendon, Taamu Starters lineup you would have. Safeties- golden, other spot? Cb- Ike, Lewis, Allen brown Olb- Woodley, worlids Ilb- Timmons, then spence? Slyvester? De- hood, heyward Nt- McClendon So the only ? That we have that will be pressing needs in a few years will be safety and ilb. And Troy and Clark have at least one year left maybe two based on health. So coming into this draft you have ilb concern. And just depth everyone else. So I can agree that this draft can be heavy on offense and I wouldn't mind it. The oline could always use a upgrade and warmack or cooper would be nice even Ben jones Wr- I think Wallace will be gone to much money he wants and doesn't fit in Haley's system, so I think a high draft pick there. Sanders is best as a slot so we need a guy opposite brown Rb- need a upgrade we have backups on our team Te- Heath has a major injury and having good te is a must in the league now We need help on both sides but offense may be the most pressing need |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Living Legend
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 3,475
Member Number: 24108
Thanks: 1,000
Thanked 843 Times in 547 Posts
|
Quote:
We agree (S, OLB, ILB), although, you have those as three of the first four picks, and I see those as the first three picks. Q: You have wanted a R2 WR. Are you now thinking/suggesting swapping that pick for a RB? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | ||||
|
Banned
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,353
Member Number: 24211
Thanks: 32
Thanked 93 Times in 75 Posts
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Starter
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 469
Member Number: 24000
Thanks: 31
Thanked 93 Times in 66 Posts
|
I don't think olb is going to be our first round pick. It's not a pressing need as everyone thinks. Woodley had a bad year and should come back strong next year he will be a steeler for years. Harrison will be back one more healthy year then he is done. And Jason worlids showed his ability this year in very limited time and coming of wrist surgery, I believe he will be a good olb the verdit is out on him and he will be given one more maybe two to show his worth. So I don't think olb is such a pressing need to pick someone in the first one and I don't believe any olb that is worth a first round pick will be there at 17.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Assistant Coach
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Blacksburg, VA
Posts: 1,401
Gender: Male
Member Number: 13907
Thanks: 24
Thanked 99 Times in 67 Posts
|
As long as the first pick is a OLB, ILB, S, or WR I'll be fine with it. No RBs worth taking in the first and we have the personnel at OL to have a good one. I wouldn't necessarily be upset with a WR but we could still get a good one in the second if we wanted. TE isn't something worth addressing in the first yet and QB obviously no. This isn't a great year to take offense in the first round.
We definitely need a RB in the first three rounds though and we could use another receiver if Wallace leaves. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Living Legend
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: The Aloha State
Posts: 3,946
Gender: Male
Member Number: 24013
Thanks: 445
Thanked 642 Times in 438 Posts
|
our defense is a helluva lot older than our offense though...
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|