I'll say it plainly - anyone questioning Big Ben is an IDIOT

[steelerschik]

Originally Posted by aa14

Okay... so now Cleveland still own the ravens... that means Baltimore get to add the colts to their total? Do we get to add our NFL championships won in 1958, 1959 and 1968? How about Baltimore's Super Bowl V or XLI victory? Or wait... that last one doesn't count because they were the colts already? How are we doing this? Let me know the rules.

Telling me that using the word dick is rude is funny. You've been rude the entire time by continuing to insult me by sarcastically calling me "smart one", "jr.", or "kiddo". I only provided you an elucidation with your incorrect use of "dribble" and "all be it". I was trying to help you out and I know you'll consider these mistakes in the future. Thank me later.

Yep, the word dick is right on par with smart one, jr and kiddo. Uh huh, equally rude. I'm tired with you now, you're boring and you didn't answer the question I asked so I can learn something new. Please re-read the post, answer the questions I posed to you, all be it maybe not to your liking, but I'm sure you'll add your usual dribble. Love your use of elucidation trying to prove something, lol, fraud and phony ravens fan, how typical.

[aa14]

Originally Posted by steelerschik

Yep, the word dick is right on par with smart one, jr and kiddo. Uh huh, equally rude. I'm tired with you now, you're boring and you didn't answer the question I asked so I can learn something new. Please re-read the post, answer the questions I posed to you, all be it maybe not to your liking, but I'm sure you'll add your usual dribble. Love your use of elucidation trying to prove something, lol, fraud and phony ravens fan, how typical.

DRIVEL... IT'S DRIVEL, DAMNIT!!! AHHH! I CAN'T GET THROUGH!!!!

[Lady Steel]

[steelerschik]

QUOTE=aa14;1084169]DRIVEL... IT'S DRIVEL, DAMNIT!!! AHHH! I CAN'T GET THROUGH!!!![/QUOTE]

Nope, it's dribble just for you, kiddo. But I see reading isn't your strong point, I'm sorry about that. I asked twice for you to answer questions from my previous post. Are you having trouble understanding? Maaebe I doesn't use enuff dribble for yer likeing. Please try your hardest to answer my questions so I can learn something new like why you're here spewing the same crap over and over. Please satisfy my desire to learn something new.

[aa14]

Originally Posted by steelerschik

Nope, it's dribble just for you, kiddo. But I see reading isn't your strong point, I'm sorry about that. I asked twice for you to answer questions from my previous post. Are you having trouble understanding? Maaebe I doesn't use enuff dribble for yer likeing. Please try your hardest to answer my questions so I can learn something new like why you're hear spewing the same crap over and over. Please satisfy my desire to learn something new.

I'm here to talk football, not to satisfy your desires. I haven't been bragging, I didn't start a thread proclaiming us world champions. I've been reminding, when appropriate, certain steeler fans because it appears they are trashing and downplaying the victory. I've tried to get involved with the discussion but some of you guys are bitter and defensive.

I've said more than a few times that Ben has been one of the best QB's in the league and the steelers are one of most storied and respected franchises to exist. Once I make that perfectly clear and give what is a contrarian view people begin to personally insult me. I haven't done anything that warrants such a vitriolic and hostile response.

[lloydwoodson]

Originally Posted by aa14

Okay... so now Cleveland still own the ravens... that means Baltimore get to add the colts to their total? Do we get to add our NFL championships won in 1958, 1959 and 1968? How about Baltimore's Super Bowl V or XLI victory? Or wait... that last one doesn't count because they were the colts already? How are we doing this? Let me know the rules.

Telling me that using the word dick is rude is funny. You've been rude the entire time by continuing to insult me by sarcastically calling me "smart one", "jr.", or "kiddo". I only provided you an elucidation with your incorrect use of "dribble" and "all be it". I was trying to help you out and I know you'll consider these mistakes in the future. Thank me later.

If I was living in Baltimore I would consider the Colts one Superbowl from that city as part of the city's history even though that team is now in Indianapolis and has absolutely nothing to do with the current Ravens.

The Baltimore Ravens are the Cleveland Browns. The only reason your team is not called the "Balitimore Browns" is because there would have been legal action taken against the NFL and Art Modell by the city of Cleveland. The new Cleveland Browns are an expansion team that has no tie to the old Browns whatsoever in terms of ownership, players or history. You could say however, that the original Cleveland Browns (now the Ravens) are part of the city of Cleveland's football history.

The recently deceased Art Modell had owned the Baltimore Ravens/Cleveland Browns since 1961. The Baltimore Ravens have 2 Superbowl championships despite existing since before the Superbowl era. The Pittsburgh Steelers have 6. I hope this helps you understand your own franchise's history.

[Fire Arians]

all i gotta say is...

with ben = 3 super bowl appearances, 2 lombardi's.

without (barring terry bradshaw) = 0

[lloydwoodson]

Originally Posted by Fire Arians

all i gotta say is...

with ben = 3 super bowl appearances, 2 lombardi's.

without (barring terry bradshaw) = 0

Don't forget about O'Donnell or Neil Still Rules 14 is going to give you a piece of his mind.

Slash took the Steelers to 2 AFC Championships... just didn't win either.

[aa14]

Originally Posted by lloydwoodson

If I was living in Baltimore I would consider the Colts one Superbowl from that city as part of the city's history even though that team is now in Indianapolis and has absolutely nothing to do with the current Ravens.

The Baltimore Ravens are the Cleveland Browns. The only reason your team is not called the "Balitimore Browns" is because there would have been legal action taken against the NFL and Art Modell by the city of Cleveland. The new Cleveland Browns are an expansion team that has no tie to the old Browns whatsoever in terms of ownership, players or history. You could say however, that the original Cleveland Browns (now the Ravens) are part of the city of Cleveland's football history.

The recently deceased Art Modell had owned the Baltimore Ravens/Cleveland Browns since 1961. The Baltimore Ravens have 2 Superbowl championships despite existing since before the Superbowl era. The Pittsburgh Steelers have 6. I hope this helps you understand your own franchise's history.

Ugh...

I understand how the Ravens came into existence. Maybe if you actually read what I was replying to you'd realize I was making fun of her inferring Cleveland still owned the Ravens. Calling us the "Cleveland Ravens" has nothing to do with the old history of the Browns and I was only following that thread. Thanks for the history lesson though.

[steelerschik]

Originally Posted by aa14

Ugh...

I understand how the Ravens came into existence. Maybe if you actually read what I was replying to you'd realize I was making fun of her inferring Cleveland still owned the Ravens. Calling us the "Cleveland Ravens" has nothing to do with the old history of the Browns and I was only following that thread. Thanks for the history lesson though.

You were doing a piss poor job at that. Don't care about your silly little comments dude. I will always call the ravens the cleveland ravens and I know that cleveland doesn't still own them jr. It's called sarcasm. There's just so much you don't understand.