Why register with the Steelers Fever Forums?
 • Intelligent and friendly discussions.
 • It's free and it's quick. Always.
 • Enter events in the forums calendar.
 • Very user friendly software.
 • Exclusive contests and giveaways.

 Donate to Steelers Fever, Click here
 Our 2013 Goal: $400.00 - To Date: $00.00 (00.00%)
 Home | Forums | Editorials | Shop | Tickets | Downloads | Contact Pittsburgh Steelers Forum Feed Not Just Fans. Hardcore Fans.

Go Back   Steelers Fever Forums > General Football > NCAA Football


Steelers Fever Fan Shop

Doc's Sports Get FREE NFL Picks and College Football picks as well as Football Lines like live NFL Lines and updated NFL Power Rankings all at Doc's Sports Service.

Steelers Steelers - Referees    Browns

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-05-2007, 09:59 AM   #61
Stillers#1
Banned
 
Stillers#1's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Living in Spokane, WA because fo the Air Force.
Posts: 1,178
Gender: Male
Member Number: 1082
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: 2006 National Champions?

Quote:
Originally Posted by steelreserve View Post
Now that the Rose Bowl is over, do I even need to say "LMFAO" at this and all the other obnoxious chatter over the last couple months about how OSU and Michigan are obviously so much better than everyone else in the country? Or is that kind of understood?
I'll go ahead and file this one under the "you play 100 games and USC is bound to win one" file. I am still not going to say USC is better than UM. This wasn't even a neutral site.
Stillers#1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2007, 10:28 AM   #62
BengalBrian
Assistant Coach
Supporter
 
BengalBrian's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,167
Member Number: 428
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: 2006 National Champions?

I still have hope for a semi happy football season if OSU pulls it off.. If they dont, its going to be a crappy game for sure.... I think the USC game was a fluke... USC is NOT that good... I do kinda wish we got to play USC in the championship rather than Florida just to expose them the way Michigan should have
__________________

**** the Steelers!
BengalBrian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2007, 03:05 PM   #63
Stillers#1
Banned
 
Stillers#1's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Living in Spokane, WA because fo the Air Force.
Posts: 1,178
Gender: Male
Member Number: 1082
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: 2006 National Champions?

If USC gets ranked number 2 I will never watch College Football again. Boise State deserves it.
Stillers#1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2007, 03:31 PM   #64
Hines0wnz
Living Legend
 
Hines0wnz's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,074
Gender: Male
Member Number: 3085
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: 2006 National Champions?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stillers#1 View Post
If USC gets ranked number 2 I will never watch College Football again. Boise State deserves it.
Better get ready to watch something else next fall then.
__________________
Hines0wnz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2007, 11:36 AM   #65
Godfather
Living Legend
Supporter
 

Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,140
Member Number: 547
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: 2006 National Champions?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stillers#1 View Post
If USC gets ranked number 2 I will never watch College Football again. Boise State deserves it.
I wouldn't go that far, but if that happens the NCAA should ban human polls and force the BCS to go with a straight RPI.

How can a 2-loss team--with both losses being to unranked teams--be better than an undefeated team, a one-loss BCS conference champion, the loser of the national championship game (either one loss or two losses to ranked teams), and a 2-loss team whose losses were on the road to ranked teams?

Just shows how there's no logic to the polls. If Oregon State and UCLA suck as bad as the voters say, then Southern Cal has two bad losses.
Godfather is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2007, 11:42 AM   #66
Stillers#1
Banned
 
Stillers#1's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Living in Spokane, WA because fo the Air Force.
Posts: 1,178
Gender: Male
Member Number: 1082
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: 2006 National Champions?

Quote:
Originally Posted by steelreserve View Post
There. I fixed it for you. Seriously, dude, USC mauled them, and the stadium didn't have much to do with it.

I guess you can go ahead and claim that Michigan getting blown out shows that the Big 10 rules. But my own confidence isn't exactly shattered after my original prediction of a USC rout was right on the money, and for exactly the right reasons, too.

As for OSU-Florida, I hope Florida wins, but that one's kind of up in the air. All I'll say is that it's going to be a good game, or at least better than the people who keep saying "OSU BEST TEAM EVAR WEL'L BEAT FLORDIDA 55-0 THEY DONT EVEN BELONG ON THE SAME FEILD11111111111111" are willing to believe.

And that the fans deserve to see Boise play the winner, even though they'd never let that happen.
I'm sorry dude, but you got it wrong, that game was kind of like the little giants movie. You can't tell who is better by one game. Just liek the bungles/Steelers we still really don't know is actually better. UM is a better team than USC. And as much as i hate to admit it, OSU is going to thrash Florida.
Stillers#1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2007, 02:21 PM   #67
MACH1
Quest For Seven
Supporter
 
MACH1's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Idaho
Posts: 13,444
Member Number: 3236
Thanks: 1,071
Thanked 3,224 Times in 1,273 Posts
Default Re: 2006 National Champions?

Last time I checked 13-0 was still better than 12-1. But we'll see what happens.
__________________


ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
MACH1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2007, 03:44 PM   #68
Hines0wnz
Living Legend
 
Hines0wnz's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,074
Gender: Male
Member Number: 3085
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default The reason USC will be ranked #2

$




They shouldnt even be ranked in the top 5.
__________________
Hines0wnz is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Shoutbox provided by vBShout v6.2.1 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.0.8 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd. Runs best on HiVelocity Hosting.
Navbar with Avatar by Motorradforum
no new posts