To tuck or not to tuck... - Page 2

Hammer67 · 07-19-2007, 12:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Livinginthe past

My answer would be that you dont tuck a pullover/jumper/sweater (whatever you guys call it) into your pants.

I don't have any scientific reasoning to hand.

I agree 100%. I would never tuck any outerwear. The only thing that gets "tucked" as it were, would be the undershirt.

being that every Fruit of the Loom and Haynes commercial you see has them tucking in the undershirt, it just seems natural.

If I am wearing a standard tee shirt and pair of shorts, obvioulsy the tee shirt is untucked.

Jman · 07-19-2007, 12:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LarryNJ

I tuck my t-shirts into my pants but not my underwear. That's really strange dude! You need to listen to your sister in law.

BTW: Is she hot?

Kneeslapper!

P.S. - took a pole here at work, and they gave a thumbs down on the tucking in the underwear.

Preacher · 07-19-2007, 12:30 PM

May we get a ruling from the NFL on the tuck rule?

Oh, sorry Raider fans!

Hammer67 · 07-19-2007, 02:44 PM

I know...but WHY THUMBS DOWN! No one has an answer!

ChronoCross · 07-19-2007, 02:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammer67

I know...but WHY THUMBS DOWN! No one has an answer!

There is no true answer for it. Even I find it wierd that you tuck your shirt in your panties..:P.. But even then a fad came around a few years ago were kids tucked there shirts in there panties and wore there panties basically outside there pants, which I found totally funny, and knocked my oldest boy for a loop when he tried to do that. People dress how they dress, and what is comfortable to them.

Preacher · 07-19-2007, 03:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammer67

I know...but WHY THUMBS DOWN! No one has an answer!

I gotta say...

If the pants slip a little low, or the shirt raises up, it is actually better for someone to see the undershirt... or even skin, then your underwear. Think about it... your wife would rather touch your bum then the underwear that was on them!

jtdapit · 07-19-2007, 03:30 PM

Well bro. if the shirts too small and shows some white. tuck it. If the shirts just right and no white shows then i leave it.

Hammer67 · 07-19-2007, 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Preacher

I gotta say...

If the pants slip a little low, or the shirt raises up, it is actually better for someone to see the undershirt... or even skin, then your underwear. Think about it... your wife would rather touch your bum then the underwear that was on them!

Hmmm, how often does that happen? I never thought much about it but don't recall that ever happening. And, what makes your undershirt any more sightworthy then your boxers? Just curious. I never really put much thought to this.

Oh well...I guess I just like to avoid the shirts bunching up more then worrying about whatever preconceived fashion mistake I am committing!

Steelerstrength · 07-19-2007, 04:12 PM

Well, if your undershirt is long enough to be in the crack of your ass, I'd say do not tuck into your boxers.

When I'm wearing a dress shirt, on a cooler day, I wear a beater underneath. I do not tuck into my boxer-briefs. No prob with bunching. Sounds like personal preference to me.

Preacher · 07-19-2007, 04:31 PM

Gotta admit...

The funniest thing, is the seriousness of this thread!

	Why register with the Steelers Fever Forums? • Intelligent and friendly discussions. • It's free and it's quick. Always. • Enter events in the forums calendar. • Very user friendly software. • Exclusive contests and giveaways.
Donate to Steelers Fever, Click here	Our 2013 Goal: $400.00 - To Date: $00.00 (00.00%)

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)