And the Shite hits the fan for Frye

[Preacher]

Originally Posted by HometownGal

This is a blessing in disguise for Frye - he's with a contender now instead of a pretender. I wish the kid a lotta luck.

I will SO laugh if he comes back to lead Seattle into a BIG win over the Browns.. 3 touchdowns, 300 yards... no INTs.

[fansince'76]

Originally Posted by Preacher

I will SO laugh if he comes back to lead Seattle into a BIG win over the Browns.. 3 touchdowns, 300 yards... no INTs.

He probably will - he'll be behind an actual O-line in Seattle. THAT was their problem Sunday. Peyton Manning would have been just as ineffective against the kind of rush we were putting on them.

[MasterOfPuppets]

Originally Posted by Mosca

I like the kid.

A HUGE part of his problem was that he played for the Browns. Cowher always thought he had a strong upside. He goes from the worst team in the league to a contender; good for him!

Tom

cowher.???.......odonell,grahm,tomzak,corkie,maddo x,miller....

[SteelerFanInCA]

Unbelievable. I guess we literally scared him out of town.

[MasterOfPuppets]

i'd rather play for a whiner than a cheater...

[RoethlisBURGHer]

Frye has a chance to sit and learn something behind Hasselbeck. He sat behind Dilfer for a bit, but Dilfer has no interest in helping Frye and was a shitty QB to begin with. Not to mention he gets to work with Walruss...oops I mean Holmgren...who is considered a QB guru.

[Preacher]

Originally Posted by fansince'76

He probably will - he'll be behind an actual O-line in Seattle. THAT was their problem Sunday. Peyton Manning would have been just as ineffective against the kind of rush we were putting on them.

I agree!

Our D was VERY strong. Again, I loved how we dropped our safeties to cover the deep routes of the receivers and thus used our CB's to jump short routes,

[lamberts-lost-tooth]

Originally Posted by fansince'76

Same here - I have no ill will towards Frye. He got a raw deal.

Agreed...I hope now that he can sit behind a proven QB, he will get a chance to learn the nuances of the game from a vantage point other than having his backside on the turf.

[lamberts-lost-tooth]

Originally Posted by Preacher

I agree!

Our D was VERY strong. Again, I loved how we dropped our safeties to cover the deep routes of the receivers and thus used our CB's to jump short routes,

Good point Preacher...but we had to rob Peter to pay Paul...and we left Kellen open too much for my taste. The upside is that WHEN the LB's dropped into good coverage, the Browns couldnt lead the TE....and we should only get better as the games progress.

[revefsreleets]

This is good news for Frye.

I've changed my mind about Quinn. He should start this week against the Bengals. They don't play defense (Steve McNair payed the worst game of his career and the Ravens horrible offense still hung 20 points on the Bungals) and the Browns offense actually matches up pretty well. Quinn will be safe this week.