Does Obama "Hate White People? Native Americans"?

[HAWK]

Wow...I'm gone for a few days and things get so juicy!!

[xfl2001fan]

Originally Posted by HAWK

Wow...I'm gone for a few days and things get so juicy!!

Things move around here...gotta stay on your toes. It's like a regular Sopp Opera.

We shall call this show:

People With No Lives

[HometownGal]

Originally Posted by xfl2001fan

Things move around here...gotta stay on your toes. It's like a regular Sopp Opera.

We shall call this show:

People With No Lives

Or . . .

As The Stomach Turns.

[Vincent]

Originally Posted by revefsreleets

Obama campaigned against Bush and "all his failed policies". He basically told the American people Bush was evil, stupid, bad, and wrong and that everything he did needed to be changed. Either Obama KNEW that to not be the case (unlikely) or he had no idea what he was talking about and was just saying what was politically expedient to get elected (far more likely).

By all left accounts BHO runs the show. He's just @#%$ing brilliant. Even writes his own speeches (that begs questions about the dependency on the teleprompter). Following that line, he fully knew the efficacy of many Booosh policies and just played on hollow sloganeering to an amazingly dumb electorate.

Originally Posted by revefsreleets

The problem is NOT that he went on to adopt many, MANY of those same policies that were evil and wrong only a few months earlier. That was smart. The policies were sound, and he was just ignorant until educated about them. The problems are that the left cannot and will not acknowledge that Bush was originally right, they cannot and will not acknowledge that Obama at best flip-flopped, at worst lied, and they cannot and will not acknowledge that they are being hypocritical. .

I think the larger problem is that bho lied about Boosh's "failed policies" to get elected, knowing full well he wouldn't get called on it by the "media" goons or his stupefyingly dumb supporters. No "flip-flop. Lies.

Hypocritical? Hypocracy has no play when your entire existence and body of words are lies. This isn't about truth or honor or integrity. This is about acquiring power and holding it

Originally Posted by revefsreleets

As an aside, I want to clarify that, yes, it is good and wise of Obama to, after learning that he was wrong about much of this stuff, to continue on with the strong and correct policies of Bush, but that does NOT clear him of his earlier "sins" of ignorance and "Bush bashing". Him, and his followers, probably owe Bush an apology, one that, given the high and haughty nature of the liberal left mentality, will never be forthcoming.

The left acknowledging their error, any error? That would require class that results from an existence and associated ideas they don't need to lie about in the first place. Thats why they have to crush opposition. Their "ideas" don't pass the muster of scrutiny. Noone would buy their bull@#$% on its merit. So they lie and seek to destroy anybody and anything that opposes them.

How incredible is it that the electorate gave even more seats to a majority that had an 8% approval rating? They didn't do that because of congress' performance. They did it because of what they were told. I always go by what they do, not by what they say.

I won't give bho the benefit of the doubt because he hasn't earned it. His "body of work", his associations, his personal history and his written and spoken words validate that position.

[tony hipchest]

lets clear this up for mr. buttinski:

i say-

Originally Posted by tony hipchest

why do you support letting aids run rampant as a way of exterminating homosexuals and drug users with no regard for the dangers posed to the rest of the nation (and world)?

an obvious reference to the reagan administration turning a blind eye on an blatanly appearant epidemic. why is this reference so obvious? because america NO LONGER ignores AIDS nor views it as just a homosexual and drug user/haitian disease. JUST LIKE america no longer owns slaves, commits genocide on indians, denies treatment for poor blacks infected with STD's so doctors and scientists can watch how they die, etc....

you say-

Originally Posted by I_Bleed_Black_And_Gold

Because there are much more pressing issues than AIDS to deal with in our country. With only a few exceptions (blood transfusions, etc.), AIDS is 100% avoidable in America. Cancer, on the other hand, is not.

you actually justified the reagan administration turning a blind eye, because they, too, thought there were "much more pressing issues to deal with".

SO, by your own words, it is appearant that EITHER a) you support ignoring AIDS as a means of exterminating unclean people, OR b) you clearly didnt comprehend or understand what you read when you so rudely decided to jump into the middle of and interrupt the grown-ups conversation.

im backed into a corner? youre the one wearing the dunce cap.

everybody knows that AIDS is now a controlled disiease (in america atleast) and the research and attempts to educate the masses has paid off. it isnt a level 5 on the threatometer. thanks. now you can sit there in your corner and watch and let the big boys play.

[Preacher]

Originally Posted by HometownGal

Why in the bloody blue hell am I going to waste my time answering any of your questions when you'll spin and deflect my answers as you always do to me and others who disagree with you and don't worship at the Obaaaaaaama altar?

I'm not even going to address your other jibberish. It's the same old shit, different thread. Spin, deflect, spin, deflect, spin, deflect.

And then wants someone to take him series when HE is trying to make a point in political threads. That is the funniest thing of all.