Why register with the Steelers Fever Forums?
 • Intelligent and friendly discussions.
 • It's free and it's quick. Always.
 • Enter events in the forums calendar.
 • Very user friendly software.
 • Exclusive contests and giveaways.

 Donate to Steelers Fever, Click here
 Our 2013 Goal: $400.00 - To Date: $00.00 (00.00%)
 Home | Forums | Editorials | Shop | Tickets | Downloads | Contact Pittsburgh Steelers Forum Feed Not Just Fans. Hardcore Fans.

Go Back   Steelers Fever Forums > Steelers Football > Pittsburgh Steelers


Steelers Fever Fan Shop

Doc's Sports Get FREE NFL Picks and College Football picks as well as Football Lines like live NFL Lines and updated NFL Power Rankings all at Doc's Sports Service.

Steelers Steelers - Bills Bills
August 16th, 2014, 7:30pmET

CBS
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-12-2011, 10:53 PM   #1
tony hipchest
IRONMAN a.k.a. Tony Stark
 
tony hipchest's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Give me back my game...
Posts: 38,663
Member Number: 658
Thanks: 1,641
Thanked 6,963 Times in 3,018 Posts
Default mendenhall only in for 20 of 61 snaps

not 20 rushes. not even 20 touches. he was only in the game for 1/3 of the offensive snaps.

infact a running back was only used on 35 of the total offensive snaps, and mendenhall didnt even see the field after the 38th.

the steelers have no offensive identity other than being a sack/interception/fumble waiting to happen.

an offensive coordinator should try to play to his teams strengths, but he only seems focused on playing to bens strength (which is scrambling and ad libbing to save his life).

everyone knows our o-line is more adept in run block as opposed to pass blocking, otherwise we wouldnt constantly scout out supposedly agile, atheletic, pulling linemen.

an identity crisis paralyzes our offense especially vs a team as familiar with us like the ravens.

arians "trick them with every personell package under the sun" is totally predictable.

five 350 lbs tubs of lard would have ben looking like troy aikman, mendenhall looking like emmit smith, and wallace blowing m. irvin away.

instead we will try to fool the opponents by passing with a run blocking line, and instead of scheming for opponents and actually relying on our coaches to gameplan and outsmart them, place a games outcome soley on the physical capabilities of the atheletes.

i sure hope gary kubiak or norv turner get fired so we can finally have a real offensive coordinator when brucie hangs em up.

its pathetic when even chan gailey can look like a miracle worker, while our guy is still tripping over his feet, talking about a pony backfield.

LMAO! thats the greatest joke ive heard since john kuhn was released.
__________________
tony hipchest is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2011, 10:59 PM   #2
JustinM
Draft Prospect
 
JustinM's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 108
Gender: Male
Member Number: 18803
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: mendenhall only in for 20 of 61 snaps

maybe we purposely lost this one so we can KILL the Ravens next time we meet up. I mean we only need so many wins to advance to the playoffs...why show any or all of your cards right up front??
JustinM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2011, 11:03 PM   #3
ricardisimo
Administrator
 
ricardisimo's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Lalaland
Posts: 5,430
Gender: Male
Member Number: 15369
Thanks: 320
Thanked 874 Times in 421 Posts
Default Re: mendenhall only in for 20 of 61 snaps

That's pathetic, especially considering that running back is the one position that most requires reps and getting into a rhythm. Win or lose, there was clearly no intention of accentuating the run game. I wonder how Art feels about being disobeyed right now.
__________________
Why does God hate amputees?
ricardisimo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2011, 11:05 PM   #4
Sixburgher
Banned
 

Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 685
Member Number: 17648
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: mendenhall only in for 20 of 61 snaps

Quote:
Originally Posted by tony hipchest View Post
everyone knows our o-line is more adept in run block as opposed to pass blocking, otherwise we wouldnt constantly scout out supposedly agile, atheletic, pulling linemen.
In 2005, maybe. This line does nothing well. It's composed of Pouncey and four stiffs.
Sixburgher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2011, 11:05 PM   #5
ricardisimo
Administrator
 
ricardisimo's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Lalaland
Posts: 5,430
Gender: Male
Member Number: 15369
Thanks: 320
Thanked 874 Times in 421 Posts
Default Re: mendenhall only in for 20 of 61 snaps

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sixburgher View Post
In 2005, maybe. This line does nothing well. It's composed of Pouncey and four stiffs.
Yes and no. Colon and Kemo were known as run blockers for years.
__________________
Why does God hate amputees?
ricardisimo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2011, 11:07 PM   #6
Fire Arians
Anti-Spammer Mod
 
Fire Arians's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 10,082
Member Number: 16570
Thanks: 1,670
Thanked 6,089 Times in 2,607 Posts
My Mood: Yeehaw
Default Re: mendenhall only in for 20 of 61 snaps

i wonder what the percentage rate of sacks/interceptions happen from the empty backfield set, seems like if there's no running back to help out against the pass rush, ben doesn't even have 2 seconds to throw the ball
Fire Arians is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2011, 11:13 PM   #7
tony hipchest
IRONMAN a.k.a. Tony Stark
 
tony hipchest's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Give me back my game...
Posts: 38,663
Member Number: 658
Thanks: 1,641
Thanked 6,963 Times in 3,018 Posts
Default Re: mendenhall only in for 20 of 61 snaps

Quote:
Originally Posted by JustinM View Post
maybe we purposely lost this one so we can KILL the Ravens next time we meet up. I mean we only need so many wins to advance to the playoffs...why show any or all of your cards right up front??
lol... i like your way of thinking.

whaitaminute... bruce, is that you?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardisimo View Post
That's pathetic, especially considering that running back is the one position that most requires reps and getting into a rhythm. Win or lose, there was clearly no intention of accentuating the run game. I wonder how Art feels about being disobeyed right now.
they arent disobeying the boss. remember? according to bruce, the boss didnt say to run the ball more, but more "effectively".

mendenhall certainly was effective in the SB and our most recent ravens game (where bruces hairbrained schemes and lack of a fullback werent getting him killed).

this is where bruce is a genius, plotting to get the ball out of the fumble machines hands and into the guy who will throw interceptions while under duress.

i would prefer he just defer to the special teams coach and punter. atleast their unit seems to be functioning somewhat normally and sane.
__________________
tony hipchest is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2011, 11:21 PM   #8
tony hipchest
IRONMAN a.k.a. Tony Stark
 
tony hipchest's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Give me back my game...
Posts: 38,663
Member Number: 658
Thanks: 1,641
Thanked 6,963 Times in 3,018 Posts
Default Re: mendenhall only in for 20 of 61 snaps

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sixburgher View Post
In 2005, maybe. This line does nothing well. It's composed of Pouncey and four stiffs.
ricardisiomo is spot on.

i dont care if our o-line is primarilly known as c0ck blockers....

having mendenhall in for only 33% of total offensive snaps is assinine.

abandoning the fullback position altogether is one thing. but giving up on a working running game seems retarded.

i'll even give m. moore credit for looking pretty good on his 2 plays until his cold hands coughed up the ball.
__________________
tony hipchest is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2011, 11:53 PM   #9
MACH1
Quest For Seven
Supporter
 
MACH1's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Potataho
Posts: 14,068
Member Number: 3236
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 4,741 Times in 1,784 Posts
Default Re: mendenhall only in for 20 of 61 snaps

I really, really hope this is arians last year.

The game was not out of hand when he abandoned the running game.
__________________


ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
MACH1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2011, 12:18 AM   #10
tony hipchest
IRONMAN a.k.a. Tony Stark
 
tony hipchest's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Give me back my game...
Posts: 38,663
Member Number: 658
Thanks: 1,641
Thanked 6,963 Times in 3,018 Posts
Default Re: mendenhall only in for 20 of 61 snaps

whats funny is airhead typically abandons the running game to deflect attention from himself. ben and pouncey are golden, so nobody wants to blame them for mendehall being smothered by ngata before he even had the ball.

and of course, arians lacks any bit of accountability. he runs his mouth at any given opportunity, but ive never heard him shoulder the blame for anything. he lets tomlin or the players carry that burden.

its just like him abandoning the run in last years superbowl when it was his hybrid wannabe 270 lb TE fullback who whiffed on a block, allowing mendenhall to so graciously fumbnle.
__________________
tony hipchest is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Shoutbox provided by vBShout v6.2.1 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.0.8 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd. Runs best on HiVelocity Hosting.
Navbar with Avatar by Motorradforum
no new posts