Why register with the Steelers Fever Forums?
 • Intelligent and friendly discussions.
 • It's free and it's quick. Always.
 • Enter events in the forums calendar.
 • Very user friendly software.
 • Exclusive contests and giveaways.

 Donate to Steelers Fever, Click here
 Our 2013 Goal: $400.00 - To Date: $00.00 (00.00%)
 Home | Forums | Editorials | Shop | Tickets | Downloads | Contact Pittsburgh Steelers Forum Feed Not Just Fans. Hardcore Fans.

Go Back   Steelers Fever Forums > Steelers Football > Pittsburgh Steelers


Steelers Fever Fan Shop

Doc's Sports Get FREE NFL Picks and College Football picks as well as Football Lines like live NFL Lines and updated NFL Power Rankings all at Doc's Sports Service.

Steelers Steelers - Giants Giants
August 9th, 2014, 7:30pmET

CBS
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-03-2006, 03:12 PM   #21
SteelCzar76
Banned
 
SteelCzar76's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,233
Gender: Male
Member Number: 2498
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Charles Rogers?? Any takers?

Quote:
Originally Posted by 83-Steelers-43 View Post
Wilson looked fine to me since the second half of last season up until now.

Hines Ward is well.....Hines Ward.

Washington looked fine to me ever since the Bronco's playoff game.

Holmes and Reid will develope.

Haynes on screens.

Heath Miller.

I'll start being concerned if Holmes and Reid start dropping balls and if Wilson starts looking like Wilson in the first eight games of last season. Until then, I'm content. I really haven't seen a reason or reasons to not be content. When our first string offense was out on the field I thought it looked very nice (Ben to Wilson in particular). I'm just curious to see what it looks like when we actually start game planning.


I'm anxious to see how we do with actual game planning as well. I'm almost certain that Santonio and Willie will develop nicely. But it's just something about Ced that doesn't move me,.....he's okay,....but clumsy,...and when we play teams with stout secondary's,... he almost vanishes into thin air (with the exception of the T'd catch in Denver).
I'm just tired of having to resort to gadget plays to be able to pass the ball come playoff time. Because Hines is the only elite receiver on the field. And as far as Nate,.....i just don't think he's physical enough,...and question his ability to get off jams and block.
Would i like for these cat's to pan out this year and give Ben a "Yancey, Hastings, Ernie Mill's core"? certainly,.....but i just don't see that with Ced and Nate.
Hopefully,...i'm wrong,..... cause they're all we have got as of now.


"Hail Caesar,.....Hail the Black and Gold
SteelCzar76 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2006, 05:45 PM   #22
Mosca
Team President
Supporter
 
Mosca's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Mountain Top, PA
Posts: 2,397
Gender: Male
Member Number: 1751
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Charles Rogers?? Any takers?

Quote:
Originally Posted by SteelCzar76 View Post
And also,....in reference to being "Non-Steeler" material. Your saying that no Steeler of the past or PRESENT has or does smoke weed ?....
I was going to elaborate, but I wanted to see if anyone followed up like you did.

It's one thing to accept and deal with the problems of players you know, it's another thing to take on an unknown player with problems. If your own has substance problems, you're OK dealing with it; but would you adopt a player with substance problems?

I don't see our team needing to take on any risky players, AT ALL. I think Nate Washington is on the verge of a breakout season. I think the two youngsters are going to be great. Really, we have phenomenal talent at WR. It's not like it has been in the past. This team is on the verge of greatness; we're as deep as a team can be in the free agent era. We could use another strong back, but let's see what happens when the games start counting and we bring a game plan with us.


Tom
Mosca is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2006, 12:00 PM   #23
noto45
Bench Warmer
 
noto45's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Washington, IL
Posts: 364
Gender: Male
Member Number: 984
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Charles Rogers?? Any takers?

thats a HUGE hellno
__________________


"You play tough, you play smart, and above all ..... you play physical."
noto45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2006, 01:28 PM   #24
Steel12
Banned
 

Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Fort Walton Beach, FL
Posts: 270
Gender: Male
Member Number: 2397
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Charles Rogers?? Any takers?

Charles Rogers would be a good addition to the WRs we have now. I don't see how he couldn't come in and compete for the #3 job. Big, fast and is talented...IMO his other problems would go away if he was with a positive squad such as ourselves.
Steel12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2006, 01:37 PM   #25
SteelCityMan786
SF's Youngest Legend
 

Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hollidaysburg PA
Posts: 19,587
Gender: Male
Member Number: 541
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: Charles Rogers?? Any takers?

NEVER NEVER NEVER BRING IN CHARLES ROGERS. It would be a waste of Money. The Dolphins are definantly wasting money with Joey Harrington. Why should we waste our money on a joke.
__________________

786 Ways To Score Touchdowns
SteelCityMan786 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2006, 05:34 PM   #26
19ward86
Head Coach
 
19ward86's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Pittsburgh, Ohio
Posts: 1,976
Gender: Male
Member Number: 2717
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Charles Rogers?? Any takers?

cough...horrible....cough cough
__________________
[YOUTUBE]PGrTvNzGCZE[/YOUTUBE]
You must watch this video.
19ward86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2006, 11:36 AM   #27
FSUBoo
Bench Warmer
 
FSUBoo's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Inglis, Florida
Posts: 189
Gender: Male
Member Number: 2907
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Charles Rogers?? Any takers?

I really can't see us picking up Rogers for 2 reasons. 1) The attitude that he is said to have is something that Pittsburgh's front office tends to avoid, and 2) the Steelers never spend big on any free agent. If we would have went after a wide reciever, I feel like we would have in free agency, and also that we wouldn't have drafted Santonio Holmes.

On another note, I liked Chad Jackson a little more in what I saw of him, but I'm not gonna question the front office's decision making. That's why I'm a fan, and they are actually working for the Steelers. They are paid to do a whole lot more research on players.
FSUBoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Shoutbox provided by vBShout v6.2.1 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.0.8 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd. Runs best on HiVelocity Hosting.
Navbar with Avatar by Motorradforum
no new posts