Why register with the Steelers Fever Forums?
 • Intelligent and friendly discussions.
 • It's free and it's quick. Always.
 • Enter events in the forums calendar.
 • Very user friendly software.
 • Exclusive contests and giveaways.

 Donate to Steelers Fever, Click here
 Our 2014 Goal: $450.00 - To Date: $450.00 (100.00%)
 Home | Forums | Editorials | Shop | Tickets | Downloads | Contact Pittsburgh Steelers Forum Feed Not Just Fans. Hardcore Fans.

Go Back   Steelers Fever Forums > Steelers Football > Pittsburgh Steelers


Steelers Fever Fan Shop

Doc's Sports Get FREE NFL Picks and College Football picks as well as Football Lines like live NFL Lines and updated NFL Power Rankings all at Doc's Sports Service.

Steelers

LOL

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-12-2014, 04:43 PM   #1
Joelbushbaum
Starter
 

Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Florida
Posts: 504
Member Number: 25082
Thanks: 82
Thanked 255 Times in 160 Posts
My Mood: Cynical
Default Should the Steelers consider keeping only two quarterbacks?

We have a lot of young talent at safety and linebacker who can also cover kicks well.

If you ask me Landry Jones is too easy to pressure, and his accuracy is just okay. I'd rather keep two QB's on the team, a practice squad QB and one of the young guys at at LB or Db in favor of Landry Jones. Thoughts?
Joelbushbaum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2014, 04:44 PM   #2
Vis
Banned
Supporter
 

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: SC
Posts: 8,259
Gender: Male
Member Number: 5117
Thanks: 834
Thanked 5,968 Times in 2,867 Posts
My Mood: Tired
Default Re: Should the Steelers consider keeping only two quarterbacks?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joelbushbaum View Post
We have a lot of young talent at safety and linebacker who can also cover kicks well.

If you ask me Landry Jones is too easy to pressure, and his accuracy is just okay. I'd rather keep two QB's on the team, a practice squad QB. Thoughts?
Right now we only have one. Who do you want to add?
Vis is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Vis For This Useful Post:
Buddha Bus (08-12-2014), fer522 (08-12-2014), harrison'samonster (08-12-2014), teegre (08-12-2014)
Old 08-12-2014, 04:45 PM   #3
SteelerJT
Living Legend
 
SteelerJT's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Philly
Posts: 3,411
Gender: Male
Member Number: 25777
Thanks: 11,697
Thanked 5,824 Times in 2,612 Posts
Default Re: Should the Steelers consider keeping only two quarterbacks?

No. It has no affect on the Gameday roster. It's better to have an inactive guy who knows the playbook, than to pick someone off the streets in November.
__________________
"You don't always know what Ike is talking about, but he's entertaining as hell to listen to."
SteelerJT is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to SteelerJT For This Useful Post:
BLACK_AND_YELLOW (08-12-2014), El-Gonzo Jackson (08-12-2014), harrison'samonster (08-12-2014)
Old 08-12-2014, 04:46 PM   #4
Joelbushbaum
Starter
 

Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Florida
Posts: 504
Member Number: 25082
Thanks: 82
Thanked 255 Times in 160 Posts
My Mood: Cynical
Default Re: Should the Steelers consider keeping only two quarterbacks?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vis View Post
Right now we only have one. Who do you want to add?
Got Charlie Batch's phone number?
Joelbushbaum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2014, 05:19 PM   #5
PhantomJB93
Team President
 
PhantomJB93's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Blacksburg, VA
Posts: 2,117
Gender: Male
Member Number: 13907
Thanks: 495
Thanked 1,076 Times in 512 Posts
My Mood: Drunk
Default Re: Should the Steelers consider keeping only two quarterbacks?

Honestly? I'm dead serious. Honestly?

Sign Tebow.

No joke.

Laugh as much as you want but even if he just uses his legs he would not be a bad backup QB at all. I would trust Tebow to win us a game in a pinch over Landry Jones or Gradkowski. He may not be starter material but, REALLY, would you be that scared of handing him the ball if Ben got hurt for a game or two? You have to factor in that even if his passing sucks his running game might make up for it in a pinch. The media storm would be annoying for a little bit but between Manziel and LeBron it might go away fast. And obviously the Steelers are a team that won't perpetuate it.
PhantomJB93 is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to PhantomJB93 For This Useful Post:
harrison'samonster (08-12-2014), Lokki (08-13-2014), steelfury02 (08-12-2014)
Old 08-12-2014, 05:34 PM   #6
GodfatherofSoul
Head Coach
Supporter
 
GodfatherofSoul's Avatar
 
Spellbound Champion! Add Like Mad Champion! Yeti Sports 1- Long Shot Version Champion! X-Training Champion! Commando Champion!
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 1,940
Gender: Male
Member Number: 14842
Thanks: 2,005
Thanked 2,379 Times in 1,159 Posts
Default Re: Should the Steelers consider keeping only two quarterbacks?

Quote:
Originally Posted by PhantomJB93 View Post
Honestly? I'm dead serious. Honestly?

Sign Tebow.

No joke.

Laugh as much as you want but even if he just uses his legs he would not be a bad backup QB at all. I would trust Tebow to win us a game in a pinch over Landry Jones or Gradkowski. He may not be starter material but, REALLY, would you be that scared of handing him the ball if Ben got hurt for a game or two? You have to factor in that even if his passing sucks his running game might make up for it in a pinch. The media storm would be annoying for a little bit but between Manziel and LeBron it might go away fast. And obviously the Steelers are a team that won't perpetuate it.
Don't quote me, but I was under the impression he only wanted to play somewhere he had a shot at starting.
__________________
The Haaardest Workin' Man On The Internet
GodfatherofSoul is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to GodfatherofSoul For This Useful Post:
harrison'samonster (08-12-2014), PhantomJB93 (08-12-2014), SteelerJT (08-12-2014), steelfury02 (08-12-2014)
Old 08-12-2014, 05:39 PM   #7
Cyphon
Head Coach
 

Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,859
Member Number: 24613
Thanks: 789
Thanked 1,595 Times in 829 Posts
Default Re: Should the Steelers consider keeping only two quarterbacks?

Quote:
Originally Posted by PhantomJB93 View Post
Honestly? I'm dead serious. Honestly?

Sign Tebow.

No joke.

Laugh as much as you want but even if he just uses his legs he would not be a bad backup QB at all. I would trust Tebow to win us a game in a pinch over Landry Jones or Gradkowski. He may not be starter material but, REALLY, would you be that scared of handing him the ball if Ben got hurt for a game or two? You have to factor in that even if his passing sucks his running game might make up for it in a pinch. The media storm would be annoying for a little bit but between Manziel and LeBron it might go away fast. And obviously the Steelers are a team that won't perpetuate it.
I can't say that it is a bad idea given who our backups are. The good thing is that our receivers are used to taking a "back yard" approach with Ben so it could work well with Tebow in a pinch.
Cyphon is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Cyphon For This Useful Post:
harrison'samonster (08-12-2014), PhantomJB93 (08-12-2014), SteelerJT (08-12-2014), steelfury02 (08-12-2014)
Old 08-12-2014, 05:49 PM   #8
steelfury02
Wing Kong Exchange - CEO
Supporter
 
steelfury02's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,932
Member Number: 6076
Thanks: 5,457
Thanked 4,767 Times in 2,249 Posts
My Mood: Fine
Default Re: Should the Steelers consider keeping only two quarterbacks?

Well - I wouldn't like the attention it would bring.

If there was ever a place he could at least have a career as a backup and as an X-factor though (at least in his younger years) it would be in Pittsburgh

If he seriously thinks he is going to contend for a starting job anywhere - he needs to check his ego. He actually could serve as a #2 H-back and a #3 TE, in addition to being a #2 QB. He is absolutely someone I wouldn't mind having in red zone situations and in 3rd and short. Even as a guy that would help get our defense ready.

It sure would beat one of our other backups - at least the guy brings more to the table - not even saying he has to be used as a weapon X at all, but, the Steelers could do worse

not happening though
__________________

I'VE GOT SOME YOUTHFUL ADJUSTMENTS FOR 'DAT AZZ
steelfury02 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to steelfury02 For This Useful Post:
harrison'samonster (08-12-2014), PhantomJB93 (08-12-2014), SteelerJT (08-12-2014)
Old 08-12-2014, 05:49 PM   #9
casteeler
Head Coach
 
casteeler's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Heinz field West
Posts: 1,504
Gender: Male
Member Number: 15446
Thanks: 200
Thanked 275 Times in 186 Posts
My Mood: Fine
Default Re: Should the Steelers consider keeping only two quarterbacks?

If Kirk Cousins was the backup on this team then yes, with Gradkowski and Jones nope.
casteeler is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to casteeler For This Useful Post:
harrison'samonster (08-12-2014)
Old 08-12-2014, 06:09 PM   #10
PhantomJB93
Team President
 
PhantomJB93's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Blacksburg, VA
Posts: 2,117
Gender: Male
Member Number: 13907
Thanks: 495
Thanked 1,076 Times in 512 Posts
My Mood: Drunk
Default Re: Should the Steelers consider keeping only two quarterbacks?

Quote:
Originally Posted by GodfatherofSoul View Post
Don't quote me, but I was under the impression he only wanted to play somewhere he had a shot at starting.
I would think considering he hasn't even been on a roster for a year that he would take any offer extended to him, especially since the role of Steelers backup QB is one that is likely to see legitimate playing time compared to most backups, but who knows...
PhantomJB93 is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to PhantomJB93 For This Useful Post:
harrison'samonster (08-12-2014)
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Shoutbox provided by vBShout v6.2.1 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.0.8 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd. Runs best on HiVelocity Hosting.
Navbar with Avatar by Motorradforum
no new posts