Why register with the Steelers Fever Forums?
 • Intelligent and friendly discussions.
 • It's free and it's quick. Always.
 • Enter events in the forums calendar.
 • Very user friendly software.
 • Exclusive contests and giveaways.

 Donate to Steelers Fever, Click here
 Our 2014 Goal: $450.00 - To Date: $450.00 (100.00%)
 Home | Forums | Editorials | Shop | Tickets | Downloads | Contact Pittsburgh Steelers Forum Feed Not Just Fans. Hardcore Fans.

Go Back   Steelers Fever Forums > Steelers Football > Pittsburgh Steelers


Steelers Fever Fan Shop

Doc's Sports Get FREE NFL Picks and College Football picks as well as Football Lines like live NFL Lines and updated NFL Power Rankings all at Doc's Sports Service.

Steelers Fever Presents...

Steelers Panthers

GAMEDAY
Sunday, September 21, 8:30 PM
NBC
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-04-2006, 05:59 AM   #1
83-Steelers-43
Living Legend
 
83-Steelers-43's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 12,993
Gender: Male
Member Number: 1009
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Cook: Steelers vs. Bucs wasn't a Mozart and it wasn't good viewing

Cook: Steelers vs. Bucs wasn't a Mozart and it wasn't good viewing
Monday, December 04, 2006

By Ron Cook, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Maybe the 5,000 people who came to Heinz Field dressed as empty seats yesterday had the right idea.

Maybe they realized there were better things to do on a seasonable December Sunday afternoon than watch the Steelers and Tampa Bay Buccaneers try to play football.

A little holiday shopping, perhaps. Or raking the last of the leaves. Or laundry ...

Yes, doing a load of undies somehow seemed preferable to watching the Steelers not so much beat the Buccaneers, 20-3, as survive them.

The only person who had a worse day than the players and coaches on both sides was the Fox Television executive who made the decision to switch the kickoff from 1 to 4:15 p.m. and make this a national telecast.

He or she subjected America to this?

And just think, the NFL Network will bring the Cleveland Browns-Steelers game Thursday night at Heinz Field into the nation's living rooms.

Hasn't America suffered enough?

The game yesterday brought to mind the words of Steelers coach Bill Cowher, who once was famously quoted after an ugly win, "It wasn't a Moatzart."

Or a Mozart, either.

But, really, what did you expect? Those were the 4-7 Steelers lined up against the 3-8 Buccaneers. Do you think those teams sunk that low in the standings by accident? They were there for a reason. They're bad teams.

Don't even try saying you felt sorry for the people who had to watch the Houston-Oakland game yesterday.

Make no mistake, this was our little version of Houston-Oakland.

The only good news for the smallish crowd of 59,843 was that the Buccaneers were a lot worse than the Steelers. Their 13 offensive possessions ended with a sack of quarterback Bruce Gradkowski by linebacker Joey Porter, a dropped pass by running back Carnell Williams, an interception by linebacker Larry Foote, another sack by Porter, a sack by defensive end Brett Keisel, a sack by defensive end Aaron Smith, a fumble by Williams, a punt, an interception by cornerback Bryant McFadden after wide-open wide receiver Michael Clayton dropped what should have been a 39-yard touchdown pass, a sack by cornerback Deshea Townsend when Gradkowski just fell down to avoid being hit, an incomplete pass, an interception by linebacker Clint Kriewaldt and a ticky-tack 27-yard field goal on the game's final play that saved Buccaneers coach Jon Gruden, who fancies himself as something of an offensive genius, the embarrassment of being shut out.

That's bad.

The Steelers were better, but not by a lot.

Yes, the defense picked up its game after being embarrassed a week earlier in Baltimore. But was it really that good or was the Buccaneers' offense that bad? Gruden never seemed to call a pass play longer than 2 or 3 yards. Gradkowski, the kid from Dormont who couldn't possibly have had a worse homecoming, played like a sixth-round draft pick whom no one really wanted, taking five sacks and throwing three interceptions and almost a fourth when Townsend dropped a pass with nothing but green grass in front of him.

Offensively, the Steelers couldn't run the ball with Willie Parker despite trying all afternoon. The rest of their offense was maddeningly inconsistent. It wasn't just the dropped passes by wide receiver Santonio Holmes and tight end Heath Miller or the false-start penalty on guard Kendall Simmons on a fourth-and-1 play at the Tampa Bay 36. Quarterback Ben Roethlisberger threw a horrible interception on the Steelers' first possession, No. 20 of the season, a staggering total for someone so talented. Later, Roethlisberger showed his marvelous ability, throwing touchdown passes to tight end Jerame Tuman and Miller and, most spectacularly, avoiding the pass rush to throw a 36-yard beauty to wide receiver Nate Washington. Kicker Jeff Reed made a 50-yard field goal to give the Steelers an insurmountable 10-0 lead, then missed from 32 yards.

That inconsistency is why there are no playoffs in the Steelers' immediate future.

As disappointed as you are, imagine how they're feeling in Tampa this morning even if the sun is shining and it's 80 degrees.

If nothing else, they should be ashamed of Gruden.

You won't see a more bush-league move than his decision to send out kicker Matt Bryant for that field goal with 4 seconds left. Even Cowher -- always hesitant to criticize another coach -- couldn't contain himself from saying how he wouldn't stoop so low.

What's the No. 1 rule for any coach?

Win with class, lose with dignity and, above all else, respect the game?

Gruden failed miserably.

Just like his pitiful team.

http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/06338/743401-87.stm
__________________
83-Steelers-43 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2006, 08:28 AM   #2
HometownGal
Living Legend
 
HometownGal's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: The Burgh
Posts: 21,479
Gender: Female
Member Number: 2413
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Cook: Steelers vs. Bucs wasn't a Mozart and it wasn't good viewing

Quote:
And just think, the NFL Network will bring the Cleveland Browns-Steelers game Thursday night at Heinz Field into the nation's living rooms.

Hasn't America suffered enough?
Then I have a suggestion for you, Mr. Cook. Don't watch it.

These reporters crack me up. Who really hasn't realized by now that this season has been one huge beer fart? I dunno - to me, being a Steelers fan means sticking by the team through the highs and lows and this season definitely qualifies as a low. Why sound like a broken record and keep nitpicking at a team that isn't going anywhere this season? Enjoy the win, no matter how "un-Mozart" like it was and look forward to the next game. Considering how dismal this season has been, winning out and finishing 9-7 would be a bonus, I would think.
__________________


The Anti-Wahoo
HometownGal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2006, 08:38 AM   #3
Infamix
Team President
Supporter
 
Infamix's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,283
Gender: Male
Member Number: 917
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Cook: Steelers vs. Bucs wasn't a Mozart and it wasn't good viewing

Quote:
Originally Posted by HometownGal View Post
Then I have a suggestion for you, Mr. Cook. Don't watch it.

These reporters crack me up. Who really hasn't realized by now that this season has been one huge beer fart? I dunno - to me, being a Steelers fan means sticking by the team through the highs and lows and this season definitely qualifies as a low. Why sound like a broken record and keep nitpicking at a team that isn't going anywhere this season? Enjoy the win, no matter how "un-Mozart" like it was and look forward to the next game. Considering how dismal this season has been, winning out and finishing 9-7 would be a bonus, I would think.

I agree. But I think the reporters just try and empathize with the fans and readers.
Infamix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2006, 09:11 AM   #4
HometownGal
Living Legend
 
HometownGal's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: The Burgh
Posts: 21,479
Gender: Female
Member Number: 2413
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Cook: Steelers vs. Bucs wasn't a Mozart and it wasn't good viewing

Quote:
Originally Posted by Infamix View Post
I agree. But I think the reporters just try and empathize with the fans and readers.
I think the reporters simply want to sell newspapers - in this day and age, unfortunately, negativity sells. If the Steelers had sucked for the past 10 years or so, I could understand all of the gloom and doom from the grim reapers, but they haven't. Seems to me that not only are us fans spoiled by all of the Steelers successes over the past 3 decades, most recently the ride we experienced last season, so are the reporters. For God's sake - this season is pretty much a bust - focus on what positives there are each week instead of nitpicking at and magnifying the negatives (not speaking to you, Infamix, but the sports jocks in general). They'll have the entire off-season to play Monday morning QB and nitpick to their hearts' content. For now, let us and the team enjoy their victory.
__________________


The Anti-Wahoo
HometownGal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2006, 09:27 AM   #5
tony hipchest
IRONMAN a.k.a. Tony Stark
 
tony hipchest's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Give me back my game...
Posts: 39,299
Member Number: 658
Thanks: 1,922
Thanked 8,333 Times in 3,528 Posts
Default Re: Cook: Steelers vs. Bucs wasn't a Mozart and it wasn't good viewing

i dont mind the negativity and telling of the truth by the local media but mr. cook does seem to suggest that the fans shouldnt even bother with the steelers for the remainder of the season. like 60,000 empty seats would be a good thing.

have fun with you underwear mr. cook. and next thursday when youre scooping up dog poop in your back yard i will be watching the steelers do the same with the browns
tony hipchest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2006, 12:29 PM   #6
Steelers
Starter
 
Steelers's Avatar
 

Join Date: May 2006
Location: York, PA
Posts: 539
Gender: Male
Member Number: 2373
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Cook: Steelers vs. Bucs wasn't a Mozart and it wasn't good viewing

Whatever. The Texans won yesterday with -5 yards passing. At the end of the day, all that matters is the addition of a win to the left column.
__________________
Steelers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2006, 12:42 PM   #7
MJ5150
Starter
 
MJ5150's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Lacey, Washington
Posts: 628
Gender: Male
Member Number: 3203
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Cook: Steelers vs. Bucs wasn't a Mozart and it wasn't good viewing

Quote:
Originally Posted by 83-Steelers-43 View Post
.......to switch the kickoff from 1 to 4:15 p.m. and make this a national telecast.
I did not get this game where I live. It sounds like I didn't miss much.

-Mike
MJ5150 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2006, 01:16 PM   #8
HometownGal
Living Legend
 
HometownGal's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: The Burgh
Posts: 21,479
Gender: Female
Member Number: 2413
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Cook: Steelers vs. Bucs wasn't a Mozart and it wasn't good viewing

Quote:
Originally Posted by MJ5150 View Post
I did not get this game where I live. It sounds like I didn't miss much.

-Mike
Sure you did, MJ - you missed watching a Steelers victory - always a most pleasant way to spend a Sunday afternoon.
__________________


The Anti-Wahoo
HometownGal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2006, 03:54 AM   #9
hellbread
Draft Prospect
 

Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 87
Member Number: 3282
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Cook: Steelers vs. Bucs wasn't a Mozart and it wasn't good viewing

what i dont understand about articles like this *this isnt the first i saw*. they say the bucs are bad... ok they are. but then they dont even give the steelers credit for anything...20-3 and almost a shut out. the steelers dominated on all sides of the ball...yet they are still crap. was the same said about the ratbirds when they beat the 'lowly' steelers? i think not...i believe it said somtin like 'ratbirds shut out defending super bowl champions'. but hey w/e ive learned these writers know bout two things...jack and $hit. jack left town.

Last edited by hellbread; 12-05-2006 at 04:16 AM.
hellbread is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Shoutbox provided by vBShout v6.2.1 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.0.8 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd. Runs best on HiVelocity Hosting.
Navbar with Avatar by Motorradforum
no new posts