|
|
Why register with the Steelers Fever Forums? • Intelligent and friendly discussions. • It's free and it's quick. Always. • Enter events in the forums calendar. • Very user friendly software. • Exclusive contests and giveaways. |
|
Donate to Steelers Fever, Click here |
Our 2013 Goal: $400.00 - To Date: $00.00 (00.00%) |
| Home | Forums | Editorials | Shop | Tickets | Downloads | Contact |
|
|||||||

Get FREE NFL Picks and College Football picks as well as Football Lines like live NFL Lines and updated NFL Power Rankings all at Doc's Sports Service.
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#11 |
|
Water Boy
![]() Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: I live in the beautiful mountains of Western North Carolina.
Posts: 18
Gender: Male
Member Number: 4909
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I like what Arians is saying!!!!! With the capabilities we have in the passing game PLEASE USE THEM!!!!! Mix up the play calling and simplify for the players, AWESOME!!!!
We can do more than just line up and RUN IT EVERY FIRST DOWN. Ben is the man and he can handle it!! I know he can. ROCK ON!!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Resigned
![]() Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 9,916
Member Number: 728
Thanks: 74
Thanked 201 Times in 129 Posts
|
With all the changes it is good that the Steelers get the extra HOF exhibition game and additional practice time.
In addition to recovering from the appendectomy and the crash, IMHO a big reason Ben and the offense did not get in sync until the KC game was teh lack of preseason game reps. I am not wild about the receiving corps behind Hines & Holmes, but this team has bigger needs to address (OL & LB) than WR in the draft. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 559
Gender: Male
Member Number: 2231
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
4 wides on first down.... not a bad idea if you have Marvin H., Reggie W, Dallas Clark, brandon stoakley, etc....
We need to add another weapon on the offensive side of the ball if they are gonna play that style of offense...IMO |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Living Legend
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: May 2006
Location: living in the field of dreams
Posts: 3,330
Gender: Male
Member Number: 2313
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I have concerns about arians since he did fail here in cleveland. I like the fact he is changing the playbook though. I love the idea of having 4 wideouts. I'm assuming they will be Ward, Holmes, Washington and probably reid. I wish training camp started tommorow.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,480
Gender: Male
Member Number: 2911
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I think as LITP stated we can use Heath as a 4th WR in the 4 WR set. Does anyone think Dallas Clark is a better TE or better siuted for that than Heath?(hell no) You can line up in a 3 WR set then shift to 4 wide. I don't believe there are many LB's that can cover Heath, and if an additional CB is brought in we spring FWP. I really like this idea and believe we have the WR's in Ward, Holmes, Washington and Wilson or Reid (you notice I put Nate 3rd and not Wilson) or as stated above Heath. Imagine the blocking with Ward and Heath on run plays out of that set. We all have stated we need Heath more involved in the passing game, this could be one way to do that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
IRONMAN a.k.a. Tony Stark
![]() Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Give me back my game...
Posts: 34,340
Member Number: 658
Thanks: 184
Thanked 230 Times in 164 Posts
|
during the erhardt era, odonnell had
thigpen graham mills johnson stewart and TE green to throw to. odonnell still holds the record for fewest int / passing attempts over a career. im sure this is the goal in mind with ben. when arians was in cleveland they were thought to have a very good and deep wr corps 1-4 (northcutt, morgan, johnson, davis) the routes and the scheme are gonna get players open so we dont need 5 great wr's. hines, holmes, washington, heath, and wilson (if still around) could succeed in these formations. theres still w. reid who has potential. theres the catch phrases "less is more" and "keep it simple stupid", and in this case stramlining what has proven to be a successful yet complex playbook is gonna be good for everybody, especially the rookies. more than any team the steelers have seemed more hesitant to let rookies crack the starting line up in recent years. we need to give are young players as much of a chance to succeed as possible. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
THE PRINCESS' Daddy
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 8,783
Gender: Male
Member Number: 2398
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I like our younger receivers in Washington and Wilson (although he's middle age for a WR). But I also think that Reid can come out of the wood works this year. I think Young has some potential to take over a 4th WR spot.
But hey, I'm a little more optimistic I guess. I also agree that this formation could open up big holes for FWP.
__________________
60 Minutes, 53 Men, 6 Trophies,1 NATION. . .STEELERS NATION!!! Sig courtesy of STEELAX04 |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Resigned
![]() Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 9,916
Member Number: 728
Thanks: 74
Thanked 201 Times in 129 Posts
|
Quote:
With Willie Parker's style of running, the Foster/Morris/Bettis model of ball control running was broken. Since Parker certainly is not (and should not) be going anywhere, something has to change, although since Arians cannot block his edited playbook will be of little value unless the OL steps up. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Team Owner
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,943
Member Number: 4570
Thanks: 5
Thanked 38 Times in 26 Posts
|
big difference between o'donnell and BR. i can't see BR ever getting the hang of seeing 4 to 5 WRs on the field. he has enough trouble with 2.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Living Legend
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: May 2006
Location: living in the field of dreams
Posts: 3,330
Gender: Male
Member Number: 2313
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|