Why register with the Steelers Fever Forums?
 • Intelligent and friendly discussions.
 • It's free and it's quick. Always.
 • Enter events in the forums calendar.
 • Very user friendly software.
 • Exclusive contests and giveaways.

 Donate to Steelers Fever, Click here
 Our 2014 Goal: $450.00 - To Date: $450.00 (100.00%)
 Home | Forums | Editorials | Shop | Tickets | Downloads | Contact Pittsburgh Steelers Forum Feed Not Just Fans. Hardcore Fans.

Go Back   Steelers Fever Forums > Steelers Football > Pittsburgh Steelers

Steelers Fever Fan Shop

Doc's Sports Get FREE NFL Picks and College Football picks as well as Football Lines like live NFL Lines and updated NFL Power Rankings all at Doc's Sports Service.

Pro Bowl
8:00PM Eastern on ESPN

Thread Tools
Old 10-04-2005, 11:54 PM   #1
Living Legend
Koopa's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Third Coast Born, That Mean I'm Texas Raised
Posts: 3,439
Gender: Male
Member Number: 508
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Ward better off without Burress?

Wednesday, October 05, 2005
By Ed Bouchette, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Plaxico Burress benefited by leaving the Steelers, and it probably helped Hines Ward, too.

They never said as much, but there's little chance the Steelers would have paid both wide receivers big money to stay. They chose to let Burress flee in free agency, and Ward collected the largest signing bonus in team history last month, $9 million as part of a new five-year contract worth $27.5 million.

Ward also scored on the field, specifically four touchdowns in three games. That matches his total from last season and he points to the absence of the 6-51/2 Burress as a big part of it.

"This year, me going out there and not having Plaxico opposite me, my role has kind of changed in the red zone," Ward said. "Where last year everyone wants to just throw it up to Plax and I was kind of like the odd man out.

"I was still in my progressions, but that's what all the fans and the media said: 'You'd be stupid not to use [Burress] to your advantage, he's 6-6, throw it up and let the guy make a play. Well, we don't have that on our team. To me, you don't have to be 6-6 or whatever, if you have good body adjustments ... you can do it."

Burress caught five touchdown passes with the Steelers last season, one more than Ward. But Ward had more touchdown catches than Burress in each of the previous two seasons with Tommy Maddox at quarterback, 10 to four in 2003 and 12 to seven in 2002 when the Steelers passed a lot more than they did with Ben Roethlisberger last season.

Burress has four touchdowns in four games for the Giants and his 25 receptions have him tied for eighth place in the NFC. He averages 15.8 yards per catch. Ward has 12 receptions in three games, but that leads the team. His average of 18.3 yards per catch is 6.3 yards longer than his career average. The Giants also have thrown 123 times and the Steelers just 60.

It's early in the season, but after scoring two touchdowns against the New England Patriots, including one to tie the score with 1:21 left, Ward believes he and Roethlisberger are building the kind of rapport that will turn even more productive.

"In the preseason we weren't clicking," Ward said. "But you can see it more and more.

"The touchdown for 85 yards [vs. the Patriots], he threw ball where I could get it, read the right coverage, did everything right, and I made a play for him. I took a 16-yard play and scored a touchdown."

Ward developed a strained hamstring muscle in the last game and coach Bill Cowher lists him as questionable for Monday night's contest in San Diego. Supposedly, that means he has a 50 percent chance of not playing; realistically, it's closer to zero percent.

Ward has not missed a game since he came to the Steelers as a third-round draft choice from Georgia in 1998, playing in 115 consecutive contests. He has started the past 82 games, back to the second game of 2000. He started 14 games in 1999, but Cowher decided to start rookie Plaxico Burress and second-year player Troy Edwards in 2000, bumping Ward from his starting job. It was a brief demotion. Ward replaced an injured Edwards in the second game of 2000 and has not missed a start since.

At one point this summer that streak seemed to be in jeopardy as Ward held out the first two weeks of training camp. He reported to camp and he and the team consummated a new deal the Monday before the season opener. But after he caught two passes for 25 yards in the first game, Ward heard complaints.

"I could hear some of the people go, 'Oh, you gave him the money.' But I don't sit there and overreact. When I do get the opportunity I take full advantage of it."

He followed with 10 receptions and four touchdowns the next two games.

"Everyone wanted to see what I would do without Plax," Ward said. "I know I'm getting better. The game has slowed down. Now it's a matter of me helping the younger guys, helping Antwaan and helping Ben to become a better quarterback."

Ward has made the past four Pro Bowls, the only Steelers receiver to make that many, and he topped the previous team record of 85 receptions three of the past four years. He caught 80 last season. He's 21 catches from breaking John Stallworth's team record of 537 career receptions and, after an off year, he appears to be the team's top scoring threat at the position. His 45 receiving touchdowns rank third on the team behind Stallworth (63) and Lynn Swann (51).

"It's a matter of being consistent," Ward said. "Tim Brown, Jerry Rice, that's how you judge a player in his career, consistency. That's my goal."

Koopa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2005, 04:37 PM   #2

Posts: n/a
Member Number:
Default Re: Ward better off without Burress?

Good article. Burress is good for the scheme he is in, because his drops on a passing team is less significant, than on a running team such as ours, as with us he needed to be mistake free to have more of a impact. As his chances or opportunites were less. The big difference between Ward and Burress is where it matters. End zone production. Plax so far is tied with Ward in this area as he sees the ball twice as much. But make no mistake about it, in the end zone when a big play is needed, Ward will be more consistant. Plax at times looks like a goofy uncoordinated giraffe. For how talented he is, his head and body often arn't in control of pressure situations. Especially in big games when it matters the most. Sure he will get you down the field but far too often he will dissappoint in the red zone. Right now Plax feels he has something to prove, but mark my words as the season goes on, it will be the same old Plax............. again when it matters the most.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2005, 04:53 PM   #3
Bench Warmer

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 346
Gender: Female
Member Number: 122
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Ward better off without Burress?

Couldn't agree with you more Slash!
CowherLover is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2005, 05:10 PM   #4
tony hipchest
tony hipchest's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: in your mouth...
Posts: 42,383
Member Number: 658
Thanks: 3,061
Thanked 14,028 Times in 5,805 Posts
Default Re: Ward better off without Burress?

hines and the steelers are both better off. not necessarily because of the on field production, but because of the salary cap implications. some big time $$$ will be needed for polamalu once hes a f.a. and i would also like to see el stay. steelers can manage with the wr's they have and ward needed to be paid. is was smart business to let plax go.
tony hipchest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2005, 06:34 PM   #5
Living Legend

Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 3,701
Gender: Male
Member Number: 618
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Ward better off without Burress?

same here Slash.
agree 100%
BIGBENFASTWILLIE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2005, 09:57 PM   #6
Assistant Coach
ironcitychef's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 1,384
Gender: Male
Member Number: 109
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: Ward better off without Burress?

Saw some article where he was one of two receivers in the past five years to have two 200 yrd games. Great again we know this. Our problem was always those 16 yard games in between. Best of luck Plax, but buyer beware.
ironcitychef is offline   Reply With Quote


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:22 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Shoutbox provided by vBShout v6.2.1 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2015 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.0.8 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2015 DragonByte Technologies Ltd. Runs best on HiVelocity Hosting.
Navbar with Avatar by Motorradforum
no new posts